LCMS
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike

A Guide to Finding Targets that are Expected but not Observed Within a UNIFI Screening Analysis

Technical notes | 2016 | WatersInstrumentation
LC/MS
Industries
Manufacturer
Waters

Summary

Importance of the Topic


Accurate detection of known or expected analytes in complex samples is critical for reliable screening in pharmaceutical, environmental, food safety and metabolomics applications.
Undetected targets can lead to false negative results that compromise study validity, regulatory compliance and quality control.
Understanding and resolving circumstances where expected targets are missing in Waters UNIFI® screening analyses enhances data integrity and confidence in results.

Objectives and Study Overview


This guide describes a step-by-step approach to locate and recover expected targets that do not appear as identified components in UNIFI accurate mass screening workflows.
The main goals are to explain why targets can be missing, propose diagnostic procedures, and provide practical parameter adjustments to reveal concealed or misassigned peaks.

Methodology and Instrumentation


The analysis platform is the Waters UNIFI Scientific Information System, using accurate mass screening methods that convert raw 2D or 3D data into candidate components for target matching.
Key software modules include: 3D-peak detection, component summary, Target by Mass settings, isotope clustering, and the 3D Viewer.
Typical data include low and high energy channels, optional ion mobility separations, and in-source fragment and derived target assignments.

Main Results and Discussion


Several root causes of missing targets were identified and addressed:
  • Alternative assignments: When multiple target entries match the same component, only the best match may be listed unless alternative assignments are enabled or viewed.
  • Ion classified as in-source fragment: A derived target and its in-source fragment can compete; fragment assignments can suppress parent target detection.
  • Candidates outside tolerance: Components just outside m/z or retention time windows may be omitted but can be retrieved by widening tolerances or applying custom filters.
  • Isotope clustering settings: Monoisotopic ions may be clustered as isotopes of another component; adjusting clustering parameters or setting maximum isotopes per cluster to one prevents this.
  • Component culling: Excessive candidate counts may be truncated by default screening or discovery limits. Monitoring processing warnings and raising “maximum candidates” thresholds retains lower intensity components.
  • Peak detection limits: Low energy intensity thresholds, background filters and maximum peaks retained per channel can discard weak or interfering signals. Lowering thresholds or disabling stringent filters can recover missing ions.
  • True absence: If no ion exists in the raw data at expected m/z/RT, the analyte is below instrument sensitivity.

Benefits and Practical Applications


Applying these diagnostic and parameter-tuning procedures enables analysts to:
  • Reduce false negatives in targeted screening and discovery.
  • Optimize method sensitivity and selectivity in UNIFI workflows.
  • Improve confidence in component identification for QA/QC, metabolite profiling and impurity screening.
  • Customize target-specific tolerances and filters for challenging analytes.

Future Trends and Potential Uses


As software evolves, UNIFI will expand derived target libraries beyond metabolite identification and refine in-source fragmentation algorithms.
Advanced machine learning may automate detection of borderline components and suggest optimal parameter settings.
Integration of ion mobility, data-independent acquisition and real-time diagnostic reporting will further enhance reliability of target screening.

Conclusion


By understanding how UNIFI processes and filters data, analysts can systematically uncover expected but unobserved targets.
Adjusting alternative assignment settings, tolerances, isotope clustering rules, candidate retention limits and peak detection parameters restores missing components and strengthens data quality.

Reference


1. Goshawk JA, Eatough D, and Wood M. Componentization Following 3D-Peak Detection in the UNIFI Scientific Information System. 720005480EN.

Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.

Downloadable PDF for viewing
 

Similar PDF

Toggle
COMPONENTIZATION FOLLOWING 3D-PEAK DETECTION IN THE UNIFI SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION SYSTEM
COMPONENTIZATION FOLLOWING 3D-PEAK DETECTION IN THE UNIFI SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION SYSTEM Jeff Goshawk, David Eatough, and Michelle Wood The UNIFI ® Scientific Information System from Waters contains a proprietary and powerful peak detection algorithm that transforms complex full scan data into…
Key words
ponent, ponentcomponentization, componentizationunifi, unifiizat, izatcom, comfragment, fragmentcomponents, componentsions, ionscan, canion, ionenergy, energyscopolamine, scopolaminedata, datamass, massspectra
Screening Workflow for Extractables Testing Using the  UNIFI Scientific Information System
[ TECHNICAL NOTE ] Screening Workflow for Extractables Testing Using the UNIFI Scientific Information System Baiba Čabovska Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA TECHNOLOGY BENEFITS ■■ ■■ Simple MS methodology using Characterization of packaging, food contact materials, medical devices, high-resolution mass…
Key words
unifi, unifiextractables, extractablesscreening, screeningscientific, scientificplot, plotworkflow, workflowinformation, informationtechnical, technicalpackaging, packagingtesting, testingloadings, loadingsnote, notefragment, fragmentsystem, systemusing
Analysis of Plant Alkaloids Through Accurate Mass Screening and Discovery
Analysis of Plant Alkaloids Through Accurate Mass Screening and Discovery Jeff Goshawk and Michelle Wood Waters Corporation, Wilmslow, UK A P P L I C AT I O N B E N E F I T S INT RODUC T…
Key words
alkaloids, alkaloidsplant, planthrough, hroughdiscovery, discoveryscreening, screeningunifi, unififragment, fragmentaccurate, accuratetoxicology, toxicologymass, masssubmitted, submittedamygdalin, amygdalinlibrary, libraryenergy, energyuplc
Approaches to Non-targeted Analyses of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Environmental Samples
Application Note Approaches to Non-targeted Analyses of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Environmental Samples Marian Twohig, Gordon Fujimoto, Aarthi Mohan, Kari L. Organtini, Kenneth J. Rosnack, Simon Hird Waters Corporation, University of Massachusetts Amherst Abstract Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances…
Key words
pfas, pfaswastewater, wastewaterunifi, unifitargeted, targetedsearching, searchingsubstances, substancescompounds, compoundspolyfluoroalkyl, polyfluoroalkylsubclasses, subclassesloss, losspertaining, pertainingcan, canlibraries, librariespfass, pfasssoil
Other projects
GCMS
ICPMS
Follow us
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike