LCMS
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike

Strategies for Targeted and Non-Targeted Screening and Differentiation of Cannabis Cultivars Using UPLC and APGC with Quadrupole Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry

Applications | 2021 | WatersInstrumentation
GC/MSD, GC/MS/MS, GC/HRMS, GC/Q-TOF, GC/API/MS, LC/TOF, LC/HRMS, LC/MS, LC/MS/MS
Industries
Food & Agriculture
Manufacturer
Waters

Summary

Importance of the Topic


Cannabis exhibits a wide range of pharmacologically active compounds that vary by cultivar and growth conditions. Accurate profiling of cannabinoids and terpenes is essential to ensure product consistency, support therapeutic research, and aid chemotaxonomic classification of cultivars.

Study Objectives and Overview


This study presents a combined workflow for both targeted and non-targeted chemical screening of 18 cannabis cultivars (including hemp) using ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) and atmospheric pressure gas chromatography (APGC) coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (QToF-MS). Multivariate analysis (PCA) is applied to differentiate chemical profiles and identify characteristic markers.

Methodology and Instrumentation


Cannabis flower samples (0.1 g, n=5 per cultivar) were homogenized and extracted for cannabinoids with acetonitrile using a Geno Grinder, and for terpenes with ethyl acetate and sonication. Data were acquired in data-independent MS² (MSE) mode to collect accurate precursor and fragment ions in a single run.

Instrumentation

  • UPLC: Waters ACQUITY UPLC I-Class with CSH Phenyl-Hexyl and CORTECS C18 columns
  • GC: Agilent 7890B with Restek Rxi-5MS column and APGC source
  • Mass Spectrometer: Waters Xevo G2-XS QToF
  • Software: MassLynx 4.2, Progenesis QI, EZinfo for multivariate analysis

Main Results and Discussion


Targeted analysis of 16 cannabinoids and 23 terpenes achieved baseline separation in UPLC-MS and GC-MS chromatograms. PCA of cannabinoid data clearly separated hemp (high CBD, low Δ9-THC) from drug-type cultivars. Extended PCA in EZinfo revealed distinct cultivar clusters (e.g., Mendo Purps, Acai, HumP). Abundance profiling highlighted variation in key markers such as cannabigerol (CBG) and Δ9-THC.

Multivariate loadings plots identified novel unknown features, including a component at m/z 374.2463 tentatively assigned to an unreported cannabinoid class. Terpene profiling by APGC-MS differentiated cultivars based on monoterpene and sesquiterpene expression, and correlation analysis linked terpene patterns to specific cultivar groups.

Benefits and Practical Applications


This integrated workflow enhances confidence in compound identification through simultaneous accurate mass precursor/fragment collection and custom libraries. It supports quality control, cultivar authentication, and chemotaxonomic studies by providing rapid, comprehensive chemical fingerprints.

Future Trends and Potential Applications


Expanding spectral and retention time databases will facilitate broader screening of minor cannabinoids and terpenes. Integration with genetic data and larger sample sets under controlled growth variables can improve cultivar classification. Advanced multivariate and machine-learning tools may enable predictive modeling of therapeutic profiles.

Conclusion


The combination of UPLC-QToF and APGC-QToF with high-resolution data acquisition and multivariate analysis constitutes a robust platform for targeted and non-targeted screening of cannabis chemistry. This approach effectively discriminates cultivars and uncovers novel chemical markers, supporting research, quality assurance, and regulatory compliance.

Reference

  1. SV Bhat, BA Nagasampagi, M Sivakumar. Chemistry of Natural Products. 2005, ISBN 3-540-40669-7.
  2. H Koltai, P Poulin, D Namdar. Promoting Cannabis Products to Pharmaceutical Drugs. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2019;132:118–120.
  3. AA Izzo, F Borrelli, R Capasso, V Di Marzo, R Mechoulam. Non-Psychotropic Plant Cannabinoids: New Therapeutic Opportunities from an Ancient Herb. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 2009;30(10):515–527.
  4. CM Andre, JF Hausman, G Guerriero. Cannabis Sativa: The Plant of the thousand and one molecules. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016;7:19.
  5. MA ElSohly, D Slade. Chemical Constituents of Marijuana: The Complex Mixture of Natural Cannabinoids. Life Sciences. 2005;78:539–548.
  6. R Brenneisen. Chemistry and Analysis of Phytocannabinoids and Other Cannabis Constituents. In: Marijuana and the Cannabinoids. 2007:17–49.
  7. C Citti, P Linciano, F Russo, L Luongo, M Iannotta, S Maione, A Lagana, AL Capriotti, F Forni, MA Vandelli, G Gigli, G Cannazza. A Novel Phytocannabinoid Isolated from Cannabis Sativa L. with an in vivo Cannabimimetic Activity Higher than Δ9-THC: Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabiphorol. Scientific Reports. 2019;9:20335.
  8. MM Radwan, MA ElSohly, D Slade, SA Ahmed, IA Khan, SA Ross. Biologically Active Cannabinoids from High Potency Cannabis Sativa. Journal of Natural Products. 2009;72:906–911.
  9. C Citti, D Braghiroli, MA Vandelli, G Cannazza. Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis of Cannabinoids: A Critical Review. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2018;147:565–579.
  10. MM Lewis, Y Yang, E Wasilewski, HA Clarke, LP Kotra. Chemical Profiling of Medical Cannabis Extracts. ACS Omega. 2017;2:6091–6103.
  11. JT Fischedick, A Hazekamp, T Erkelens, YH Choi, R Verpoorte. Metabolic Fingerprinting of Cannabis sativa L., Phytocannabinoids and Terpenoids for Chemotaxonomic and Drug Standardization Purpose. Phytochemistry. 2010;71:2058–2073.
  12. A Hazekamp, JT Fischedick. Cannabis – From Cultivar to Chemovar. Drug Testing and Analysis. 2012;4:660–667.
  13. A Hazekamp, K Tejkalova, S Papadimitriou. Cannabis: From Cultivar to Chemovar II – A Metabolomics Approach to Cannabis Classification. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research. 2016;1:202–215.
  14. P Berman, K Futoran, GM Lewitus, D Mukha, M Benami, T Shlomi, D Meiri. A New ESI-LC/MS Approach for Comprehensive Metabolic Profiling of Phytocannabinoids in Cannabis. Scientific Reports. 2018;8:14280.
  15. EB Russo. Taming THC: Potential Cannabis Synergy and Phytocannabinoid-Terpenoid Entourage Effects. British Journal of Pharmacology. 2011;163:1344–1364.
  16. MM Delgado-Povedano, C Sanchez-Carnerero, F Priego-Capote. Untargeted Characterization of Extracts from Cannabis Sativa L. Cultivars by Gas and Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry in High Resolution Mode. Talanta. 2020;208:120384.
  17. S Elzinga, J Fischedick, R Podkolinski, JC Raber. Cannabinoids and Terpenes as Chemotaxonomic Markers in Cannabis. Natural Products Chemistry & Research. 2015;3:173.
  18. KW Hillig. A Chemotaxonomic Analysis of Terpenoid Variation in Cannabis. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. 2004;32:875–891.
  19. JT Fischedick. Identification of Terpenoid Chemotypes Among High Δ9-THC-Producing Cannabis Sativa L. Cultivars. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research. 2017;2:34–47.
  20. C Orser, S Johnson, MD Speck, A Hilyard, I Afia. Terpenoid Chemoprofiles Distinguish Drug-Type Cannabis Sativa L. Cultivars in Nevada. Natural Products Chemistry & Research. 2018;6:304.
  21. J Booth, J Bohlman. Terpenes in Cannabis Sativa – From Plant Genome to Humans. Plant Science. 2019;284:67–72.
  22. G Magagnini, G Grassi, S Kotiranta. The Effect of Light Spectrum on the Morphology and Cannabinoid Content of Cannabis Sativa L. Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids. 2018;1:19–27.
  23. EA Ibrahim, M Wang, MM Radwan, AS Wanas, CG Majumdar, B Avula, YH Wang, IA Khan, S Chandra, H Lata, GM Hadad, RA Abdel Salam, AK Ibrahim, SA Ahmed, MA ElSohly. Analysis of Terpenes in Cannabis Sativa L. Using GC/MS: Method Development, Validation, and Application. Planta Medica. 2019;85:431–438.
  24. L Eriksson, E Johansson, N Kettaneh-Wold, J Trygg, C Wikstrom, S Wold. Multi- and Megavariate Data Analysis: Part I Basic Principles and Applications. 2nd Edition. Umetrics Academy. 2006.
  25. G Navarro, K Varani, I Reyes-Resina, et al. Cannabigerol Action at Cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 Receptors and at CB1–CB2 Heteroreceptor Complexes. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2018;9:632.
  26. D Cheng Hao, X Gu, P Xiao. Medicinal Plants: Chemistry, Biology and Omics. Phytochemical and Biological Research of Cannabis Pharmaceutical Resources. 2015;Chapter 11:431–464.
  27. JD Storey, R Tibshirani. Statistical Significance for Genome-wide Studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2003;100(16):9440–9445.
  28. MA ElSohly, MM Radwan, W Gul, S Chandra, A Galal. Phytochemistry of Cannabis sativa L: In Phytocannabinoids: Unraveling the Complex Chemistry and Pharmacology of Cannabis. Springer International Publishing. 2017;103–136.
  29. Cho M, So I, Chun JN, Jeon JH. The Antitumor Effects of Geraniol: Modulation of Cancer Hallmark Pathways. International Journal of Oncology. 2016;48(5):1772–1782.
  30. D Stevens, CJ Hudalla, M Twohig, K Organtini. Terpenes in Hemp and Cannabis Determined Using EI GC-MS/MS. Waters Application Note. 2020.

Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.

Downloadable PDF for viewing
 

Similar PDF

Toggle
Cannabis Testing Laboratory Solutions
Cannabis Testing Laboratory Solutions
2020|Shimadzu|Brochures and specifications
Cannabis Testing Laboratory Solutions We are the cannabis testing instrument experts. When purchasing analytical equipment, it is important to know that you are not just buying an instrument but investing in your lab’s future. Shimadzu not only provides the instrumentation…
Key words
cannabis, cannabistesting, testingpotency, potencycbga, cbgacbdv, cbdvcbc, cbccbda, cbdacbg, cbgcbn, cbncbd, cbdcannabinoids, cannabinoidsthcv, thcvthca, thcamycotoxins, mycotoxinsplatforms
Hemp Testing Laboratory Solutions
Hemp Testing Laboratory Solutions
2019|Shimadzu|Brochures and specifications
Analytical Platforms for the Hemp Lab Hemp Testing Laboratory Solutions We are the hemp testing instrument experts. When purchasing analytical equipment, it is important to know that you are not just buying an instrument but investing in your lab’s future.…
Key words
hemp, hempcbga, cbgacbdv, cbdvcbc, cbccbda, cbdacbg, cbgthca, thcacbn, cbntesting, testingcbd, cbdmetals, metalsmycotoxins, mycotoxinsthcv, thcvplatforms, platformsmoisture
Separation of 16 Cannabinoids in Cannabis Flower and Extracts  Using a Reversed-Phase Isocratic HPLC Method
[ APPLICATION NOTE ] Separation of 16 Cannabinoids in Cannabis Flower and Extracts Using a Reversed-Phase Isocratic HPLC Method Andrew J Aubin, Catharine Layton, and Shawn Helmueller Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA APPLICATION BENEFITS INTRODUCTION The Alliance™ HPLC System is…
Key words
cbd, cbdflower, flowercbl, cblthcv, thcvcbdv, cbdvcbc, cbccbg, cbgcannabinoid, cannabinoidthc, thcconcentrate, concentratecannabis, cannabisthca, thcacbn, cbnhemp, hempalliance
Expanding the Cannabinoid Target List for a Rugged HPLC Potency Method
Niloufar Pezeshk - [email protected] Expanding the Cannabinoid Target List for a Rugged HPLC Potency Method Niloufar Pezeshk and Craig Young Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. Introduction Table 2: Statistical analysis of 6-point calibration curve with seven replicates for calibration standards and…
Key words
cbd, cbdcbla, cblacbna, cbnacbca, cbcacbc, cbccbda, cbdacbdva, cbdvacbga, cbgacbg, cbgthca, thcacbn, cbnthcv, thcvcbdv, cbdvcbco, cbcocbcv
Other projects
GCMS
ICPMS
Follow us
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike