LCMS
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike

Determination of methanesulfonic acid in busulfan by ion chromatography

Applications | 2020 | Thermo Fisher ScientificInstrumentation
Ion chromatography
Industries
Pharma & Biopharma
Manufacturer
Thermo Fisher Scientific

Summary

Significance of the topic


Accurate determination of methanesulfonic acid (MSA) in busulfan is critical for assessing drug stability and safety. Busulfan hydrolyzes in aqueous conditions to MSA, which serves as an indicator of product degradation and potential toxicity at elevated levels. Including a reliable test for MSA in the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) monograph ensures robust quality control for tablet and injectable formulations.

Objectives and study overview


The study aimed to:
  • Evaluate the USP proposed limit test for MSA in busulfan using ion chromatography (IC).
  • Assess a modified sample-preparation approach with cold acetonitrile–water and reduced autosampler temperature.

The comparison focused on sensitivity, stability, reproducibility, and compliance with USP acceptance criteria (MSA ≤0.15%).

Methodology and Instrumentation


Busulfan samples and MSA standards were analyzed by suppressed-conductivity IC with the following setup:
  • System: Thermo Scientific™ Dionex™ ICS-6000 HPIC with eluent generation (EGC 500 KOH) and suppressor (ADRS 600).
  • Columns: Dionex IonPac AG11-HC guard (2×50 mm) and AS11-HC analytical (2×250 mm).
  • Eluent: Potassium hydroxide gradient (1–71 mM over 20 min). Flow rate 0.3 mL/min, column at 35 °C.
  • Detection: Suppressed conductivity. Injection volume 10 µL.

Sample preparation:
  • USP method: Dilute busulfan in cold water; autosampler at 25 °C.
  • Modified method: Use cold 30% acetonitrile–water for dilution; autosampler at 8 °C.

Results and discussion


Separation and detection:
  • MSA eluted at ~9.4 min, well resolved from acetate, chloride, and sulfate.

Stability studies:
  • Busulfan degrades fastest in water at room temperature; stability improved in cold 30% acetonitrile.
  • Standard MSA solutions remained stable for >14 days at ambient temperature.

System suitability and calibration:
  • Tailing factor ≤1.13; RSD (area) ≤2.6% for both methods.
  • Linearity r² ≥0.9998 from 0.1 to 5 µg/mL.
  • LOD/LOQ: USP method 1.25/4.16 µg/L; modified method 3.45/11.52 µg/L.

Robustness:
  • Minor changes in flow rate (±10%), column temperature (±10%), and eluent concentration (±10%) produced ≤6% shift in retention time and ≤4% change in peak shape.

Sample analysis:
  • Three commercial busulfan samples were tested; one sample exceeded the 0.15% MSA limit under both methods, confirming method specificity.
  • Under USP conditions, delay >40 min led to false positives due to ongoing hydrolysis; modified method extended acceptable analysis window to ~30 hours at 2–8 °C.

Spike recovery:
  • Modified method recoveries between 90–110% for spiked MSA levels (0.1 and 0.2 µg/mL).

Benefits and practical applications


This IC procedure delivers:
  • High selectivity and sensitivity for MSA impurity in busulfan.
  • Improved sample stability and flexible analysis time with cold acetonitrile dilution.
  • Compliance with USP monograph limits, supporting routine QC in pharmaceutical labs.

Future trends and applications


Potential developments include:
  • Advanced column chemistries for faster or higher-capacity separations.
  • Automated sample preparation and online dilution for throughput increases.
  • Broader impurity profiling using tandem mass detection or multi-dimensional IC.

Conclusion


The proposed USP IC method and its modified version both satisfy monograph requirements for MSA determination in busulfan. Employing cold acetonitrile and refrigerated autosampling enhances stability and extends analysis flexibility, while maintaining accuracy, precision, and robustness. Implementation in quality-control workflows will ensure reliable monitoring of busulfan stability.

Reference


1. Galton DA. Myleran in chronic myeloid leukaemia; results of treatment. Lancet. 1953;264:208–213.
2. Haut A, Altman SJ, Cartwright GE, Winitrobe MM. Use of Myleran in chronic myelocytic leukemia. Arch Int Med. 1955;96:451.
3. Hassan M, Ehrsson H. Degradation of busulfan in aqueous solution. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1986;4:95–101.
4. United States Pharmacopeia–National Formulary (USP–NF) 42nd ed., NF 37th. Rockville, MD: USP; 2019.
5. United States Pharmacopeia Pharmacopeial Forum 45(5) In-Process Revision: Busulfan monograph proposal.
6. Thermo Scientific Dionex IonPac AS11-HC Columns Product Manual, P/N 031333-09; February 2012.
7. USP <621> Chromatography. In: United States Pharmacopeia/National Formulary. Rockville, MD: USP; 2019.

Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.

Downloadable PDF for viewing
 

Similar PDF

Toggle
Determination of methanesulfonic acid in busulfan by ion chromatography
APPLICATION NOTE 73749 Determination of methanesulfonic acid in busulfan by ion chromatography Authors: Manali Aggrawal and Jeffrey Rohrer Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA Keywords: USP monograph, Dionex IonPac AS11-HC column, Dionex ICS-5000+ system, Dionex ICS-6000 system, USP-PF, MSA Goals…
Key words
busulfan, busulfanmsa, msausp, uspproposed, proposedmodified, modifiedsolution, solutionmethanesulfonic, methanesulfonicavg, avgmonograph, monographpassed, passedsample, samplestandard, standardmethod, methodasymmetry, asymmetrypeak
Validation of an improved ion chromatography method for the limit of choline test in the USP Succinylcholine Chloride monograph
APPLICATION NOTE 72649 Validation of an improved ion chromatography method for the limit of choline test in the USP Succinylcholine Chloride monograph Authors Hua Yang and Jeffrey Rohrer Thermo Fisher Scientific Sunnyvale, CA Keywords Dionex IonPac CS19 column, suppressed conductivity…
Key words
choline, cholinesuccinylcholine, succinylcholinechloride, chlorideusp, uspaverage, averagemethod, methodmonograph, monographrsd, rsdmsa, msamin, minlimit, limittest, testmethanesulfonic, methanesulfonicsuppressor, suppressorretention
Ion Chromatography Assay for Lithium in Lithium Hydroxide
Ion Chromatography Assay for Lithium in Lithium Hydroxide
2016|Thermo Fisher Scientific|Applications
Sachin Patil and Jeffrey Rohrer Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA Appli cat i on N ote 1 1 4 4 Ion Chromatography Assay for Lithium in Lithium Hydroxide Key Words Dionex IonPac CS16 Column, Suppressed Conductivity Detection, Pharmaceutical, USP…
Key words
lithium, lithiumasymmetry, asymmetryhydroxide, hydroxidedifference, differencemsa, msaassay, assayusp, uspeluent, eluentcalcium, calciumcation, cationdionex, dionexconcentration, concentrationmonograph, monographresolution, resolutionthermo
Ion Chromatography Assay for Lithium in Lithium Citrate
Ion Chromatography Assay for Lithium in Lithium Citrate
2016|Thermo Fisher Scientific|Applications
Sachin Patil and Jeffrey Rohrer Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA Ap plica t ion Note 1 1 21 Ion Chromatography Assay for Lithium in Lithium Citrate Key Words Dionex IonPac CS12A Column, Suppressed Conductivity Detection, Pharmaceutical, USP Monograph Goal…
Key words
lithium, lithiumcitrate, citrateassay, assaydionex, dionexmsa, msaasymmetry, asymmetrypeak, peakmonograph, monographdifference, differencecation, cationeluent, eluentthermo, thermoconcentration, concentrationfrom, fromminutes
Other projects
GCMS
ICPMS
Follow us
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike