LCMS
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike

Analysis of Residual Pesticides and Mycotoxins in Cannabis Using UPLC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS to Meet California Regulatory Requirements

Applications | 2018 | WatersInstrumentation
GC/MSD, GC/MS/MS, GC/QQQ, LC/MS, LC/MS/MS, LC/QQQ
Industries
Food & Agriculture
Manufacturer
Waters

Summary

Significance of the Topic


The rapid expansion of medical and recreational cannabis markets has elevated the need for reliable safety testing to ensure consumer protection. Residual pesticides and mycotoxins pose significant health risks if present above regulated levels. Analytical methods that deliver high sensitivity, reproducibility, and minimal sample handling are essential to meet stringent state regulations, particularly in California where action levels range down to 10 ppb for pesticides and 20 ppb for mycotoxins.

Study Objectives and Overview


This study aimed to develop and validate a streamlined workflow combining UPLC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS for simultaneous monitoring of 66 pesticides and 5 mycotoxins in cannabis flower. By leveraging a standardized database-driven method generation tool, the authors sought to minimize development time while achieving regulatory compliance, robust quantitation, and high sample throughput.

Methodology and Instrumentation


Samples of ground cannabis flower were spiked at relevant action-level concentrations, extracted with acetonitrile, and subjected to dispersive solid-phase extraction (dSPE) cleanup. The final extracts were analyzed by:
  • UPLC-MS/MS with a C18 column and gradient elution
  • GC-MS/MS with a 5 % phenyl methyl column under pulsed splitless injection

Automated method setup, including MRM transitions and data processing parameters, was performed using a curated pesticide database to ensure consistency across platforms.

Instrumentation


  • Waters ACQUITY UPLC H-Class system
  • Xevo TQ-S micro tandem quadrupole mass spectrometer (ESI+/-)
  • Xevo TQ-GC tandem quadrupole mass spectrometer (EI+)
  • XBridge BEH C18 XP 2.1×150 mm, 2.5 µm column
  • Rxi-5MS 20 m×0.18 mm×0.18 µm GC column
  • MassLynx MS Software with TargetLynx processing and Quanpedia method database

Main Findings and Discussion


Linearity for all pesticide analytes was demonstrated over 25–500 ppb (R²>0.99) and for mycotoxins over 5–100 ppb (R²>0.99) using matrix-matched calibration curves. Key challenges included co-eluting isomers (e.g., spinosad D vs. spinetoram J), which were resolved chromatographically. dSPE cleanup effectively reduced matrix suppression, yielding recoveries between 80 % and 120 % for most targets. GC-MS/MS provided complementary coverage for thermally stable or poorly ionizing pesticides, with reproducibility maintained over 50 sequential injections (RSD <15 %).

Benefits and Practical Applications


  • Single workflow for dual LC and GC analyses simplifies laboratory operations.
  • Database-driven method generation cuts setup time and reduces manual errors.
  • Sensitivity meets or exceeds California action limits for regulated residues.
  • High reproducibility supports large batch testing in QA/QC and regulatory labs.

Future Trends and Opportunities


  • Expansion of target lists as regulatory agencies update pesticide and mycotoxin requirements.
  • Integration of high-resolution mass spectrometry to detect emerging contaminants.
  • Automated data analysis and reporting using machine learning for rapid decision-making.
  • Miniaturized and field-deployable systems to support on-site testing.

Conclusion


The presented approach delivers a robust, sensitive, and efficient solution for comprehensive pesticide and mycotoxin monitoring in cannabis. Automated method generation and combined UPLC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS analysis ensure compliance with California regulations while reducing sample preparation complexity and increasing laboratory throughput.

Reference


  1. Legality of cannabis by U.S. jurisdiction, Wikipedia (accessed December 2018).
  2. California Department of Pesticide Regulation: Cannabis program overview (accessed December 2018).
  3. Bureau of Medical Cannabis Regulation: California cannabis law and regulations (December 2018).
  4. Tran K. et al., Determination of the Oregon Pesticide List in Cannabis Using dSPE Cleanup and UPLC-MS/MS, Waters application note 720006373EN (September 2018).

Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.

Downloadable PDF for viewing
 

Similar PDF

Toggle
ROUTINE ANALYSIS OF CANNABIS FOR PESTICIDES AND MYCOTOXINS USING UPLC-MS/MS
ROUTINE ANALYSIS OF CANNABIS FOR PESTICIDES AND MYCOTOXINS USING UPLC-MS/MS Kim Tran,1 Kari Organtini,1 Marian Twohig,1 Peter Alden,1 Michael S. Young,1 Narendra Meruva,1 Kenneth Rosnack,1 Gordon Fujimoto,2 Rebecca Stevens,3 James Roush,3 and Christopher J. Hudalla3 1 Waters Corporation, Milford, MA…
Key words
dspe, dspemycotoxins, mycotoxinscannabis, cannabispyrethrin, pyrethrinpesticides, pesticidesspinosad, spinosadmatrix, matrixspinetoram, spinetoramuplc, uplcfenhexamid, fenhexamiddimethomorph, dimethomorphbars, barscleanup, cleanupmevinphos, mevinphoscoumaphos
Routine Analysis of Cannabis for Pesticides and Mycotoxins using UPLC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS
Routine Analysis of Cannabis for Pesticides and Mycotoxins using UPLC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS Kim Tran,1 Kari Organtini,1 Marian Twohig,1 Peter Alden,1 Michael S. Young,1 Narendra Meruva,1 Kenneth Rosnack,1 Gordon Fujimoto,2 Rebecca Stevens,3 James Roush,3 and Christopher J. Hudalla3 1 Waters Corporation,…
Key words
pesticides, pesticidesmycotoxins, mycotoxinsuplc, uplcmin, minpcnb, pcnbdspe, dspecannabis, cannabisquanpedia, quanpediapesticide, pesticidecalifornia, californiamethod, methodspinetoram, spinetoramxevo, xevofenhexamid, fenhexamidanalysis
Determination of Pesticide and Mycotoxin Residues in Dried Cannabis Flower: LC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS Methodology to Meet the Recommended AOAC Regulatory Requirements for US States and Canada
[ APPLICATION NOTE ] Determination of Pesticide and Mycotoxin Residues in Dried Cannabis Flower: LC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS Methodology to Meet the Recommended AOAC Regulatory Requirements for US States and Canada Kim Tran, 1 Michael Young,1 Kari Organtini,1 Marian Twohig,1 and…
Key words
loq, loqcannabis, cannabismycotoxin, mycotoxinflower, flowerpesticide, pesticidedried, driedpesticides, pesticidesapgc, apgcresidues, residuesendosulfan, endosulfanpyrethrin, pyrethrinspinetoram, spinetoramspinosad, spinosadarea, areaconc
A Sensitive and Robust Workflow to Measure Residual Pesticides and Mycotoxins from the Canadian Target List in Dry Cannabis Flower
Application Note Cannabis Testing, Food A Sensitive and Robust Workflow to Measure Residual Pesticides and Mycotoxins from the Canadian Target List in Dry Cannabis Flower Authors Jean-Francois Roy1, Christophe Deckers1, Ron Honnold2, Peter Stone2, Jennifer Hitchcock2, Anthony Macherone2,4, Ben Geiling3,…
Key words
positive, positiveunder, undercannabis, cannabisextract, extractdevelopment, developmentpyrethrin, pyrethrinadded, addedacidified, acidifiedppb, ppbcyfluthrin, cyfluthrinmin, minendosulfan, endosulfanacquisition, acquisitionpesticides, pesticidesmethyl
Other projects
GCMS
ICPMS
Follow us
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike