Visualization of GABA in Brain of Adult Drosophila Melanogaster by Mass Spectrometry Imaging

Significance of the Topic

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is a key inhibitory neurotransmitter implicated in behaviors and neurodegenerative processes. Mapping its spatial distribution in the adult Drosophila melanogaster brain is vital for understanding neurobiology and disease models, but conventional immunohistochemistry visualizes only proxy markers. Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) offers direct molecular detection, yet small sample size, cuticular hardness, and poor ionization of GABA present major challenges.

Objectives and Study Overview

This study aimed to establish a robust MALDI-MSI workflow to directly visualize GABA in intact adult Drosophila heads. The goals were to:

• Develop a sectioning method preserving morphology of the tiny, cuticle-covered Drosophila head
• Enhance on-tissue derivatization to improve GABA ionization sensitivity
• Demonstrate specific spatial mapping of GABA and discriminate it from structural isomers

Methodology and Instrumentation

Adult Drosophila heads were dissected, immersed in 70% ethanol, embedded in 4% carboxymethyl cellulose and rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen. Cryosections (15 µm) were prepared at optimized temperatures using an anti-roll bar technique for uniform sections. On-tissue derivatization employed either 2,4-diphenylpyranylium tetrafluoroborate (DPP-TFB) or 4-hydroxy-3-methoxycinnamic acid (CA) reagents to introduce a fixed charge and enable isomer discrimination. A two-step matrix application used iMLayer™ vapor deposition of α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA), followed by spray deposition. MSI analysis was performed on an iMScope TRIO™ (Shimadzu) equipped with a 355 nm Nd:YAG laser under positive-ion mode, acquiring MS/MS spectra for m/z 318.15 (DPP-GABA) and m/z 264.12 (CA-GABA).

Key instruments:

• Cryostat: Leica CM1950
• Anti-roll bar sectioning accessory
• iMLayer™ matrix vapor-deposition system
• iMScope TRIO™ MALDI-MS imaging microscope
• Airbrush for matrix and derivatization reagent spray

Main Results and Discussion

Comparison of sectioning approaches showed that anti-roll bar slices yielded superior GABA signal intensity versus Cryofilm, due to reduced charge buildup. DPP derivatization enabled clear detection of m/z 232.11 fragment in the brain and entire head. CA derivatization confirmed specificity by generating distinctive product ions (m/z 191.07 and 209.08) and excluding isomeric interference. GABA distribution maps revealed uniform localization across the adult brain, consistent with GABA-synthesizing enzyme patterns and hemolymph circulation in Drosophila.

Benefits and Practical Applications

This workflow allows:

• Direct imaging of endogenous GABA in small invertebrate brains
• High-resolution spatial maps for neurodegeneration research
• Adaptation to other low-abundance, medium-polarity biomolecules

Future Trends and Potential Applications

Ongoing advances in on-tissue chemistry and matrix design will expand MSI to steroids, amino acids, and neurotransmitter networks in diverse model organisms. Rapid derivatization reagents, automated matrix deposition, and multimodal imaging integration will further enhance quantitative spatial metabolomics.

Conclusion

This study presents the first reliable MALDI-MSI method for direct GABA visualization in adult Drosophila heads, combining optimized sectioning and targeted on-tissue derivatization. It establishes a foundation for functional neurochemical mapping in genetic and disease models.

References

• Enomoto Y., Yamaguchi M., Fukusaki E., Shimma S. Anal. Sci. 34(9):1055–1062 (2018).
• Manier M.L., Spraggins J.M., Reyzer M.L., Norris J.L., Caprioli R.M. J. Mass Spectrom. 49(6):665–673 (2014).
• Shariatgorji M., Nilsson A., Källback P., Karlsson O., Zhang Z., Svenningsson P., Andren P.E. Neuron 84(4):697–707 (2014).
• Shimma S., Takashima Y., Hashimoto J., Yonemori K., Tamura K., Hamada A. J. Mass Spectrom. 48(10):1285–1292 (2013).
• Shimbo K., Yahashi A., Hirayama K., Nakazawa M., Miyano H. Anal. Chem. 81(13):5172–5178 (2009).
• Toue S., Sugiura Y., Kubo A., Ohmura M., Karakawa S., Mizukoshi T. et al. Proteomics 14(6):810–816 (2014).
• Pereanu W., Spindler S., Cruz L., Hartenstein V. Dev. Biol. 302(1):169–186 (2007).