Simple determination of haloacetic acids (HAAs) in potable water with ion chromatography hyphenated to mass spectrometry

Importance of the Topic

The analysis of haloacetic acids (HAAs) in drinking water is critical due to their formation as disinfection byproducts and potential carcinogenicity.
Regulatory bodies worldwide impose strict limits on individual and total HAA concentrations to safeguard public health.

Objectives and Study Overview

This white paper examines the benefits of coupling ion chromatography (IC) with mass spectrometry (MS) for accurate, low-level quantification of HAAs in potable water.
It presents method development, instrumentation configurations, and performance data aligned with US EPA Method 557 and related standards.

Methodology and Instrumentation

Ion chromatography separates ionic species on specialized columns (e.g., Metrosep A Supp series) with inline chemical or pneumatic suppression to minimize eluent conductivity.
Metrohm Inline Sample Preparation (MISP) automates sample cleanup, reducing manual handling and contamination risk.
Hyphenation to MS is effected via low-dead-volume PEEK capillaries (0.25 mm i.d.), with optional splitters and switching valves to divert matrix peaks away from the MS source.
Detectors include single quadrupole, triple quadrupole (QqQ), QTRAP 6500+, and high-resolution Orbitrap systems from various vendors, controlled through unified or dual-software workflows (MagIC Net, Empower 3, OpenLab CDS, Analyst®, MassHunter™, MassLynx™).
Typical flow rates range from 0.2 to 0.8 mL/min, column temperatures 10–45 °C, and injection volumes 20–100 µL.

Key Results and Discussion

IC-MS/MS using a Metrohm IC and Agilent 6470 QqQ achieved separation and quantification of nine HAAs, dalapon, and bromate over 1–500 µg/L with linear calibrations (R² > 0.99) and recoveries of 87–127% in spiked municipal water.
Single quadrupole IC-MS coupling delivered estimated LOQs of 0.15–5 µg/L for individual HAAs, meeting sub-µg/L regulatory requirements.
Flow diversion minimized MS contamination by excluding unretained matrix peaks during equilibration and preparation phases.
Post-column addition of acetonitrile enhanced electrospray desolvation and chromatographic resolution.
IC-HRMS (Orbitrap) protocols enabled suspect screening of a broad range of halogenated carboxylic acids at µg/L levels.
Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) determination by single-quad IC-MS reached a quantification limit of 0.5 µg/L in complex matrices and simulated tap water.

Benefits and Practical Applications

The IC-MS approach eliminates lengthy GC extraction and derivatization steps, reducing sample preparation time and per-analysis cost.
Automation via MISP improves reproducibility, throughput, and data integrity.
Flexible coupling to diverse MS platforms accommodates applications in environmental monitoring, quality control, and forensic analysis.

Future Trends and Applications

Advancements in high-resolution MS and unified software control will facilitate comprehensive non-targeted screening of emerging ionic contaminants.
Integration of multidimensional separations, advanced suppressor designs, and enhanced inline sample preparation will further improve sensitivity, robustness, and regulatory compliance.
Expanding regulatory limits to cover additional disinfection byproducts will drive continued method optimization.

Conclusion

Ion chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry offers a robust, sensitive, and automated solution for trace-level HAA analysis in potable water, fulfilling stringent regulatory requirements while streamlining laboratory workflows.

References

1. Barron L.; Gilchrist E. Ion Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry: A Review of Recent Technologies and Applications in Forensic and Environmental Explosives Analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 2014, 806, 27–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.10.047
2. Metrohm AG. An introduction to ion chromatography mass spectrometry (IC-MS). Metrohm AG: Herisau, Switzerland, 2021. WP-066.
3. Metrohm AG. Analysis of Anions and Oxoanions using Ion Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (IC-MS). Metrohm AG: Herisau, Switzerland, 8.000.6101.
4. Michalski R., Ed. Application of IC-MS and IC-ICP-MS in Environmental Research. John Wiley & Sons: 2016. DOI: 10.1002/9781119085362
5. Saqib Ishaq M.; Afsheen Z.; Khan A.; Khan A. Disinfection Methods. In Photocatalysts – Applications and Attributes; IntechOpen: 2019. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.80999
6. National Academies Press. Drinking Water and Health, Volume 7: Disinfectants and Disinfectant By-Products; 1987. DOI: 10.17226/1008
7. Naladala N.R.; Singh R.; Katiyar K.L.D.; et al. Effect of Pre-ozonation on Haloacetic Acids Formation in Ganga River Water at Kanpur, India. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A 2018, 99, 37–44. DOI: 10.1007/s40030-017-0226-y
8. US EPA Method 557: Determination of Haloacetic Acids, Bromate, and Dalapon in Drinking Water by IC-ESI-MS/MS; EPA 815-B-09-012; 2009.
9. Directive (EU) 2020/2184 on the Quality of Water Intended for Human Consumption; Off. J. Eur. Union 2020, L 435.
10. Wu S.; Anumol T.; Gandhi J.; et al. Analysis of haloacetic acids, bromate, and dalapon in natural waters by ion chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2017, 1487, 100–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.01.006
11. Metrohm AG. Trace haloacetic acids, dalapon, and bromate in water – Determination as per US EPA 557 applying IC-MS/MS. Metrohm AG: Herisau, Switzerland, 2019. AN-M-015.
12. Gallidabino M.D.; Hamdan L.; Murphy B.; et al. Suspect screening of halogenated carboxylic acids in drinking water using IC-HRMS (Orbitrap). Talanta 2018, 178, 57–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.08.092
13. ISO 23631:2006 Water quality — Determination of dalapon, trichloroacetic acid and selected haloacetic acids — Method using GC after extraction and derivatization. ISO: Geneva, 2006.
14. Metrohm AG. Resolving haloacetic acids in water – Increased sensitivity thanks to coupling IC with a MS detector. Metrohm AG: Herisau, Switzerland, 2020. AN-M-016.
15. Mathew J.; McMillin R.; Gandhi J.; et al. Trace Level Haloacetic Acids in Drinking Water by Direct IC and Single Quadrupole MS. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2009, 47, 505–509. DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/47.7.505
16. Solomon K.R.; Velders G.J.M.; Wilson S.R.; et al. Sources, fates, toxicity, and risks of trifluoroacetic acid and its salts. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part B 2016, 19, 289–304. DOI: 10.1080/10937404.2016.1175981
17. Scott B.F.; Macdonald R.W.; Kannan K.; et al. Trifluoroacetate Profiles in the Arctic, Atlantic, and Pacific Oceans. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 6555–6560. DOI: 10.1021/es047975u
18. Umwelt Bundesamt. Trifluoressigsäure (TFA) – Explanations on the classification of the new drinking water guideline value of 60 µg/L. Dessau-Roßlau, Germany, 2020.
19. Metrohm AG. Ion chromatography – addressing the latest challenges in environmental analysis. Metrohm AG: Herisau, Switzerland, 2018. WP-039.