Spectroelectrochemistry Applications Book

Importance of Spectroelectrochemistry

Spectroelectrochemistry combines the quantitative power of electrochemical techniques with the molecular specificity of spectroscopy. By recording optical signals (UV-Vis, NIR or Raman) simultaneously with electrochemical measurements, researchers gain a multidimensional view of electron-transfer processes, intermediate species, reaction kinetics and surface transformations. This hybrid approach is critical in fields ranging from fundamental reaction studies to materials science, energy conversion and biomedical analysis.

Objectives and Overview

The Applications Book on Spectroelectrochemistry aims to:

• Introduce the principles of UV-Vis, NIR and Raman spectroelectrochemistry.
• Illustrate typical cell configurations (normal, parallel and bidimensional).
• Summarize current application areas and highlight advances enabled by dedicated instruments and software.
• Demonstrate how combined optical/electrochemical data deepen understanding of reaction mechanisms, stability and performance.

Methodology and Instrumentation

Spectroelectrochemical experiments require strict synchronization between a potentiostat/galvanostat and a light source plus spectrometer. Typical configurations include:

• Normal geometry: light perpendicular to the electrode (reflection or transmission).
• Parallel geometry: light travels parallel to the electrode surface.
• Bidimensional geometry: simultaneous normal and parallel measurements.

Dedicated instrumentation such as the SPELEC series (UV-Vis, NIR) and SPELECRAMAN integrates light sources, spectrometers and electrochemical controllers into a single platform. Data treatment is unified via the DropView SPELEC software, the only commercial package tailored for spectroelectrochemistry.

Key Findings and Discussion

UV-Vis spectroelectrochemistry (200–800 nm) provides insights into electronic transitions and concentration changes of redox species. It has been applied to:

• Fundamental redox mechanism elucidation and parameter quantification.
• Life-science studies on DNA, proteins, neurotransmitters and antitumor agents.
• Electrocatalysis of water oxidation, hydrogen evolution and transfer hydrogenation.
• Material studies of nanoparticles, perovskites, polymers and composites.
• Energy device analysis (solar cells, batteries) and environmental monitoring.

NIR spectroelectrochemistry (800–2500 nm) probes overtone and combination bands of CH, NH and OH groups, with applications in:

• Evaluation of electrochromic materials and switching in semiconductors, conducting polymers and nanotubes.
• Study of quantum-confined systems (quantum dots, nanocrystals).
• Industrial process monitoring using ionic liquids and organic solvents to mitigate water absorption.

Raman spectroelectrochemistry exploits molecular fingerprinting and, with SERS enhancement, achieves high sensitivity. Laser wavelengths commonly used are:

• 532 nm for carbon materials and electrocatalyst intermediates.
• 638 nm for biological molecules, SERS-based sensing and corrosion studies.
• 785 nm for broad applications in mechanistic studies, SERS sensors (drugs, biomarkers, pollutants), materials characterization and energy device reactions.

Practical Benefits and Applications

By delivering simultaneous optical and electrochemical data, spectroelectrochemistry enables:

• Real-time monitoring of redox processes and intermediate formation.
• Quantitative determination of kinetic and thermodynamic parameters.
• Improved sensor design for biomedical, environmental and food analysis.
• Enhanced materials characterization for nanotechnology, energy storage and conversion.

Future Trends and Opportunities

Emerging directions include:

• Miniaturized and flow-through spectroelectrochemical cells for high-throughput screening.
• Integration with microfluidics and lab-on-chip platforms.
• Advanced data-analysis algorithms and machine-learning for multivariate signal deconvolution.
• Expansion into in-situ studies of electrochemical devices under operational conditions.

Conclusion

Spectroelectrochemistry has evolved into an accessible and versatile tool that bridges spectroscopy and electrochemistry. With dedicated instruments like the SPELEC/SPELECRAMAN platforms and tailored software, the technique continues to unlock detailed mechanistic and material insights across diverse scientific and industrial domains.

Used Instrumentation

• SPELEC UV-Vis and NIR spectroelectrochemical systems.
• SPELECRAMAN Raman spectroelectrochemical module with 532, 638 and 785 nm lasers.
• DropView SPELEC software for synchronized data acquisition and processing.

References

1. Kaim W.; Fiedler J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 3373–3382.
2. Kuwana T.; Darlington R. K.; Leedy D. W. Anal. Chem. 1964, 36, 2023–2025.
3. Heras A.; Colina A.; Ruiz V.; López-Palacios J. Electroanalysis 2003, 15, 702–708.
4. Zhangyu Y.; Tiande G.; Mei Q. Anal. Chem. 1994, 66, 497–502.
5. Nowicka A. M.; Zabost E.; Donten M.; Mazerska Z.; Stojek Z. Bioelectrochemistry 2007, 70, 440–445.
6. Syed S. N.; Schulze H.; MacDonald D.; Crain J.; Mount A. R.; Bachmann T. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 5399–5407.
7. Gonzalez-Dieguez N.; Colina A.; Lopez-Palacios J.; Heras A. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 9146–9153.
8. He J. B.; Yuan S. J.; Du J. Q.; Hu X. R.; Wang Y. Bioelectrochemistry 2009, 75, 110–116.
9. Nowicka A. M.; Zabost E.; Donten M.; Mazerska Z.; Stojek Z. Electroanalysis 2007, 19, 214–219.
10. Olmo F.; Garoz-Ruiz J.; Colina A.; Heras A. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2020, 412, 6329–6339.
11. Zhao X.; Nilges M. J.; Lu Y. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 6559–6564.
12. Vogt S.; Schneider M.; Schäfer-Eberwein H.; Nöll G. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 7530–7535.
13. Redman D. W.; Rose M. J.; Stevenson K. J. Langmuir 2017, 33, 9354–9360.
14. Takashima T.; Hashimoto K.; Nakamura R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1519–1527.
15. McSkimming A.; Chan B.; Bhadbhade M. M.; Ball G. E.; Colbran S. B. Chem. – A Eur. J. 2015, 21, 2821–2834.
16. Anker J. N.; Hall W. P.; Lyandres O.; Shah N. C.; Zhao J.; Van Duyne R. P. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 442–453.
17. Fernandez-Blanco C.; Heras A.; Ruiz V.; Colina A. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 45168–45173.
18. Izquierdo D.; Martinez A.; Heras A.; López-Palacios J.; Ruiz V.; Dryfe R. A. W.; Colina A. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 5723–5730.
19. Shallcross R. C.; Zheng Y.; Saavedra S. S.; Armstrong N. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 4866–4878.
20. Patra A.; Wijsboom Y. H.; Zade S. S.; Li M.; Sheynin Y.; Leitus G.; Bendikov M.; Reho V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 6734–6736.
21. Trznadel M.; Pron A.; Zagorska M.; Chrzaszcz R.; Pielichowski J. Macromolecules 1998, 31, 5051–5058.
22. Boehme S. C.; Vanmaekelbergh D.; Evers W. H.; Siebbeles L. D. A.; Houtepen A. J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2016, 120, 5164–5173.
23. Tsai C. H.; Chirdon D. N.; Kagalwala H. N.; Maurer A. B.; Kaur A.; Pintauer T.; Bernhard S.; et al. Chem. – A Eur. J. 2015, 21, 11517–11524.
24. Ansari M. A.; Mandal A.; Paretzki A.; Beyer K.; Kaim W.; Lahiri G. K. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 12357–12365.
25. Karaoğlan G. K.; Hışır A.; Maden Y. E.; Karakuş M. Ö.; Koca A. Dye. Pigment. 2022, 204, 110390.
26. Dimé A. K. D.; Cattey H.; Lucas D.; Devillers C. H. J. Mol. Struct. 2021, 1226, 129321.
27. Puodziukynaite E.; Wang L.; Schanze K. S.; Papanikolas J. M.; Reynolds J. R. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 2363–2369.
28. Jiménez P.; Levillain E.; Alévêque O.; Guyomard D.; Lestriez B.; Gaubicher J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 1553–1556.
29. Ibañez D.; Gomez E.; Valles E.; Colina A.; Heras A. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 280, 17–24.
30. Prado T. M.; Cincotto F. H.; Machado S. A. S. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 233, 105–112.
31. Schopf C.; Wahl A.; Martín A.; O’Riordan A.; Iacopino D. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 19295–19301.
32. Nie G.; Wang L.; Liu C. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 11318–11325.
33. Zheng W.; Wang B. B.; Lai J. C.; Wan C. Z.; Lu X. R.; Li C. H.; You X. Z. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 3072–3080.
34. Baran D.; Balan A.; Celebi S.; Meana-Esteban B.; Neugebauer H.; Sariciftci N. S.; Toppare L. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 2978–2987.
35. Dahlman C. J.; Leblanc G.; Bergerud A.; Staller C.; Adair J.; Milliron D. J. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 6021–6027.
36. Ou W.; Zou Y.; Wang K.; Gong W.; Pei R.; Chen L.; Pan Z.; Fu D.; Huang X.; Zhao Y.; et al. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 274–280.
37. Abd-Elwahed A.; Holze R. Russ. J. Electrochem. 2003, 39, 391–396.
38. Picard L.; Lincker F.; Kervella Y.; Zagorska M.; DeBettignies R.; Peigney A.; Flahaut E.; Louarn S.; et al. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 17347–17354.
39. Jeong K. S.; Deng Z.; Keuleyan S.; Liu H.; Guyot-Sionnest P. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 1139–1143.
40. Kavan L.; Dunsch L. ChemPhysChem 2003, 4, 944–950.
41. Oelsner C.; Herrero M. A.; Ehli C.; Prato M.; Guldi D. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 18696–18706.
42. Santos J. J.; Ando R. A.; Toma S. H.; Corio P.; Araki K.; Toma H. E. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 9656–9663.
43. Dmitrieva E.; Sturtz B. W.; Yang Y.; Zhang P.; Dunsch L.; Kenney M. E. Electrochem. Commun. 2021, 128, 107048.
44. Ibáñez D.; Pérez-Junquera A.; González-García M. B.; Hernández-Santos D.; Fanjul-Bolado P. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 6314–6318.
45. Mažeikienė R.; Statino A.; Kuodis Z.; Niaura G.; Malinauskas A. Electrochem. Commun. 2006, 8, 1082–1086.
46. Mažeikienė R.; Niaura G.; Malinauskas A. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 336, 195–199.
47. Mažeikienė R.; Niaura G.; Malinauskas A. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53, 7736–7743.
48. Ibañez D.; Romero E. C.; Heras A.; Colina A. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 129, 171–176.
49. Kim Y. A.; Kojima M.; Muramatsu H.; Umemoto S.; Watanabe T.; Yoshida K.; Sato K.; Ikeda T.; Hayashi T.; Endo M.; et al. Small 2006, 2, 667–676.
50. Kalbac M.; Farhat H.; Kong J.; Janda P.; Kavan L.; Dresselhaus M. S. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 1957–1963.
51. Genchev G.; Erbe A. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 163, C333–C338.
52. Shimizu M.; Koya T.; Nakahigashi A.; Urakami N.; Yamakami T.; Arai S. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 13008–13016.
53. Kornienko N.; Resasco J.; Becknell N.; Jiang C. M.; Liu Y. S.; Nie K.; Sun X.; Guo J.; Leone S. R.; Yang P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 7448–7455.
54. Rivera-Gavidia L. M.; Luis-Sunga M.; Bousa M.; Vales V.; Kalbac M.; Arévalo M. C.; Pastor E.; García G. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 340, 135975.
55. Mahajan S.; Richardson J.; Gaied N. Ben; Zhao Z.; Brown T.; Bartlett P. N. Electroanalysis 2009, 21, 2190–2197.
56. Ibañez D.; Santidrian A.; Heras A.; Kalbáč M.; Colina A. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 8191–8198.
57. Hernandez S.; Garcia L.; Perez-Estebanez M.; Cheuquepan W.; Heras A.; Colina A. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2022, 918, 116478.
58. Abdelsalam M.; Bartlett P. N.; Russell A. E.; Baumberg J. J.; Calvo E. J.; Tognalli N. G.; Fainstein A. Langmuir 2008, 24, 7018–7023.
59. Abdelsalam M. E.; Mahajan S.; Bartlett P. N.; Baumberg J. J.; Russell A. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 7399–7406.
60. Solla-Gullón J.; Vidal-Iglesias F. J.; Pérez J. M.; Aldaz A. Electrochim. Acta 2009, 54, 6971–6977.
61. Vidal-Iglesias F. J.; Solla-Gullón J.; Orts J. M.; Rodes A.; Pérez J. M.; Feliu J. M. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 10781–10789.
62. Vidal-Iglesias F. J.; Solla-Gullón J.; Pérez J. M.; Aldaz A. Electrochem. Commun. 2006, 8, 102–106.
63. Tsai M. H.; Lin Y. K.; Luo S. C. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 1402–1410.
64. Pelto J.; Haimi S.; Puukilainen E.; Whitten P. G.; Spinks G. M.; et al. Biomed. Mater. Res. – Part A 2010, 93, 1056–1067.
65. Yao J. L.; Ren B.; Huang Z. F.; Cao P. G.; Gu R. A.; Tian Z. Q. Electrochim. Acta 2003, 48, 1263–1271.
66. Hernandez S.; Perales-Rondon J. V.; Heras A.; Colina A. Nano Res. 2022, 15, 5340–5346.
67. Mažeikien R.; Niaura G.; Malinauskas A. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2011, 660, 140–146.
68. Zaleski S.; Clark K. A.; Smith M. M.; Eilert J. Y.; Doty M.; Van Duyne R. P. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 2497–2504.
69. Hernandez S.; Perales-Rondon J. V.; Heras A.; Colina A. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 334, 135561.
70. González-Hdez J.; Ott C. E.; Arcos-Martínez M. J.; Colina Á.; Heras A.; Alvarado-Gámez A. L.; Urcuyo R.; Arroyo-Mora L. E. Sensors 2021, 22, 295.
71. Sanger K.; Durucan O.; Wu K.; Thilsted A. H.; Heiskanen A.; Rindzevicius T.; Schmidt M. S.; Zór K.; Boisen A. ACS Sensors 2017, 2, 1869–1875.
72. Greene B. H. C.; Alhatab D. S.; Pye C. C.; Brosseau C. L. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 8084–8090.
73. Bindesri S. D.; Jebailey R.; Albarghouthi N.; Pye C. C.; Brosseau C. L. Analyst 2020, 145, 1849–1857.
74. Karaballi R. A.; Nel A.; Krishnan S.; Blackburn J.; Brosseau C. L. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 21356–21363.
75. Mohammadniaei M.; Yoon J.; Lee T.; Choi J. W. J. Biotechnol. 2018, 274, 40–46.
76. Hernandez S.; Perales-Rondon J. V.; Heras A.; Colina A. Anal. Chim. Acta 2019, 1085, 61–67.
77. Hassanain W. A.; Izake E. L.; Ayoko G. A. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 10843–10850.
78. Sarfo D. K.; Izake E. L.; O’Mullane A. P.; Wang T.; Wang H.; Tesfamichael T.; Ayoko G. A. Sensors Actuators, B Chem. 2019, 287, 9–17.
79. Ibáñez D.; González-García M. B.; Fanjul-Bolado P.; et al. Spectrochim. Acta – Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2021, 248, 119174.
80. Bindesri S. D.; Alhatab D. S.; Brosseau C. L. Analyst 2018, 143, 4128–4135.
81. Takeda N.; Murakoshi K. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 388, 103–108.
82. Okazaki K.; Nakato Y.; Murakoshi K. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 68, 035434.
83. Liu C.; Zhang J.; Shi G.; Chen F. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 92, 171–177.
84. Moradzaman M.; Mul G. ChemElectroChem 2021, 8, 1478–1485.
85. An A. H.; Wu L.; Mandemaker L.; Ruiter J. de; Wijten J.; Janssens J.; Stam W.; et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 16576–16584.
86. Yu H. Y.; Li X. F.; Zhang T. H.; Liu J.; Tian J. H.; Yang R. ChemSusChem 2020, 13, 2702–2708.
87. Kumar R.; Pillai R. G.; Pekas N.; Wu Y.; McCreery R. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 14869–14876.
88. Gittleson F. S.; Ryu W. H.; Taylor A. D. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 19017–19025.
89. Rodríguez-Calero G. G.; Conte S.; Lowe M. A.; Burkhardt S. E.; Gao J.; John J.; et al. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2016, 765, 65–72.
90. Hurley B. L.; McCreery R. L. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2003, 150, B367–B373.
91. López-Tocón I.; Imbarack E.; Soto J.; Sanchez-Cortes S.; Leyton P.; Otero J. C. Molecules 2019, 24, 4622.