Determination of Chloride and Sulfate in Gasoline-Denatured Ethanol
Applications | 2016 | Thermo Fisher ScientificInstrumentation
The use of ethanol as a renewable fuel additive requires careful control of inorganic anion contamination. Chloride and sulfate impurities can form corrosive deposits that damage engine and pipeline components. Reliable, sensitive and robust analytical methods are essential to ensure that denatured gasoline ethanol meets strict quality limits defined by international standards.
This work evaluates a direct injection ion chromatography method for total chloride, total sulfate and potential sulfate in gasoline denatured ethanol. It adapts a previously described method for methanol denatured ethanol to natural gasoline condensate with corrosion inhibitors. Key objectives include method ruggedness, accuracy, precision and compliance with ASTM D4806 and D7319 standards.
The analysis employs a Thermo Scientific Dionex ICS-2100 system with electrochemical eluent generation using an EGC III K2CO3 cartridge and EPM III pH modifier. Separation is achieved on an IonPac AG22 guard column and AS22 analytical column. Suppressed conductivity detection is performed with an AMMS 300 suppressor in chemical regeneration mode. A 25 microliter direct injection is used with a 4.5 mM potassium carbonate 1.4 mM potassium bicarbonate eluent at 1.2 milliliters per minute and 30 degrees Celsius. Calibration covers 0.3 to 50 milligrams per liter for chloride and 0.3 to 20 milligrams per liter for sulfate.
The method demonstrated excellent column ruggedness over more than 400 sample injections with no observable degradation. Retention time RSD was under 0.3 percent and peak area RSD under 1.6 percent. Calibration curves were linear with r2 greater than 0.999 for both analytes. Limits of detection were 6.5 micrograms per liter for chloride and 21.8 micrograms per liter for sulfate. Recoveries of spiked samples ranged from 92 to 97 percent for chloride and 100 to 104 percent for sulfate. Two industry samples showed native chloride and sulfate levels below regulatory limits. Potential sulfate was determined by oxidation with hydrogen peroxide and measured without interference.
Analytical innovations may include integration with mass spectrometric detection for broader analyte coverage and automated online sampling to enhance throughput. Expanded application of direct injection IC in biofuel production QA QC will support more diverse feedstocks and denaturant mixtures. Advances in suppressor technology and column chemistries may further improve sensitivity and reduce analysis time.
This study confirms a fast and reliable direct injection IC method for the determination of chloride and sulfate in gasoline denatured ethanol. The approach delivers excellent precision accuracy and column robustness, meeting stringent fuel quality standards and offering a practical solution for routine biofuel testing.
Ion chromatography
IndustriesEnergy & Chemicals
ManufacturerThermo Fisher Scientific
Summary
Significance of the Topic
The use of ethanol as a renewable fuel additive requires careful control of inorganic anion contamination. Chloride and sulfate impurities can form corrosive deposits that damage engine and pipeline components. Reliable, sensitive and robust analytical methods are essential to ensure that denatured gasoline ethanol meets strict quality limits defined by international standards.
Goals and Study Overview
This work evaluates a direct injection ion chromatography method for total chloride, total sulfate and potential sulfate in gasoline denatured ethanol. It adapts a previously described method for methanol denatured ethanol to natural gasoline condensate with corrosion inhibitors. Key objectives include method ruggedness, accuracy, precision and compliance with ASTM D4806 and D7319 standards.
Methodology and Instrumentation
The analysis employs a Thermo Scientific Dionex ICS-2100 system with electrochemical eluent generation using an EGC III K2CO3 cartridge and EPM III pH modifier. Separation is achieved on an IonPac AG22 guard column and AS22 analytical column. Suppressed conductivity detection is performed with an AMMS 300 suppressor in chemical regeneration mode. A 25 microliter direct injection is used with a 4.5 mM potassium carbonate 1.4 mM potassium bicarbonate eluent at 1.2 milliliters per minute and 30 degrees Celsius. Calibration covers 0.3 to 50 milligrams per liter for chloride and 0.3 to 20 milligrams per liter for sulfate.
Main Results and Discussion
The method demonstrated excellent column ruggedness over more than 400 sample injections with no observable degradation. Retention time RSD was under 0.3 percent and peak area RSD under 1.6 percent. Calibration curves were linear with r2 greater than 0.999 for both analytes. Limits of detection were 6.5 micrograms per liter for chloride and 21.8 micrograms per liter for sulfate. Recoveries of spiked samples ranged from 92 to 97 percent for chloride and 100 to 104 percent for sulfate. Two industry samples showed native chloride and sulfate levels below regulatory limits. Potential sulfate was determined by oxidation with hydrogen peroxide and measured without interference.
Benefits and Practical Applications
- Direct injection minimizes sample handling and risk of contamination
- Electrochemical eluent generation ensures reproducible eluent composition
- High sensitivity supports compliance well below specification limits
- Robust column performance reduces maintenance and downtime
- Method aligns with established ASTM international standards
Future Trends and Opportunities
Analytical innovations may include integration with mass spectrometric detection for broader analyte coverage and automated online sampling to enhance throughput. Expanded application of direct injection IC in biofuel production QA QC will support more diverse feedstocks and denaturant mixtures. Advances in suppressor technology and column chemistries may further improve sensitivity and reduce analysis time.
Conclusion
This study confirms a fast and reliable direct injection IC method for the determination of chloride and sulfate in gasoline denatured ethanol. The approach delivers excellent precision accuracy and column robustness, meeting stringent fuel quality standards and offering a practical solution for routine biofuel testing.
Instrumentation Used
- Thermo Scientific Dionex ICS-2100 or equivalent ICS series system
- EGC III K2CO3 carbonate eluent generator cartridge
- EPM III electrolytic pH modifier
- IonPac AG22 guard column and AS22 analytical column
- AMMS 300 chemical regeneration suppressor
References
- Renewable Fuels Association historic US fuel ethanol production statistics
- Biofuels the promise and the risks world bank report
- Patil Tran Giselrod sustainable production of biofuels microalgae Int J Mol Sci 2008 9 1188 1195
- ASTM D4806 specification for denatured fuel ethanol for blending with gasolines
- ASTM D7319 test method for total and potential sulfate and inorganic chloride by direct injection IC
- Dionex application note 290 determination of sulfate and chloride in ethanol according to ASTM D7319
Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.
Similar PDF
Determination of Chloride and Sulfate in Gasoline-Denatured Ethanol
2013|Thermo Fisher Scientific|Applications
Pranathi P. Perati, Brian M. De Borba, and Jeffrey S. Rohrer Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA Appli cat i on N ote 1 0 5 2 Determination of Chloride and Sulfate in Gasoline-Denatured Ethanol Key Words Renewable Energy, Alternative…
Key words
epm, epmsulfate, sulfatedenatured, denaturedchloride, chlorideregen, regengasoline, gasolineethanol, ethanoldionex, dionexegc, egceluent, eluentlabel, labelout, outconnect, connectmixer, mixersrs
Determination of Existent and Potential Sulfate and Total Inorganic Chloride in Denatured Ethanol by Direct Injection Using an RFIC System
2014|Thermo Fisher Scientific|Applications
Yongjing (Lillian) Chen, Brian De Borba, and Jeffrey Rohrer Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA Appli cat i on Update 1 9 4 Determination of Existent and Potential Sulfate and Total Inorganic Chloride in Denatured Ethanol by Direct Injection Using…
Key words
ethanol, ethanolexistent, existentsulfate, sulfatedenatured, denaturedchloride, chloridedionex, dionexinorganic, inorganicelectrolytic, electrolyticdirect, directsuppression, suppressionpotential, potentialsuppressor, suppressorinjection, injectionfuel, fuelperoxide
Determination of Sulfate and Chloride in Ethanol by Ion Chromatography
2016|Thermo Fisher Scientific|Applications
Application Note 175 Determination of Sulfate and Chloride in Ethanol by Ion Chromatography Ethanol used as a blending agent in gasoline can be contaminated with chloride and sulfate that form plugging deposits and cause corrosion in automobile engines. If sulfate…
Key words
sulfate, sulfatechloride, chlorideethanol, ethanolamms, ammschromatography, chromatographyeluent, eluention, ioniii, iiiminutes, minutesanion, aniondionex, dionexstock, stockdeionized, deionizedreagent, reagentanions
Determination of Sulfate and Chloride in Ethanol Using Ion Chromatography
2008|Thermo Fisher Scientific|Applications
Application Update 161 Determination of Sulfate and Chloride in Ethanol Using Ion Chromatography Introduction In Application Note 175, Dionex presented two ion chromatography (IC) methods that, using direct injection, can determine whether ethanol used as a blending agent in gasoline…
Key words
asrs, asrssulfate, sulfatechloride, chlorideethanol, ethanolrecycle, recycleultra, ultradionex, dionexanion, anionprepare, preparestandards, standardsastm, astmupdate, updatereagent, reagentconductivity, conductivitydetermine