Determination of Cations in Hydraulic Fracturing Flowback Water from the Marcellus Shale

Significance of the Topic

This study addresses the quantification of dissolved cations in hydraulic fracturing flowback water, a critical factor for efficient water reuse and scale control in shale gas operations. Accurate profiling of ions such as sodium, calcium, barium and strontium informs treatment strategies, reduces reliance on fresh water supplies, and minimizes operational downtime due to scaling in pipes and pumps.

Objectives and Study Overview

The primary goal was to develop and validate an ion chromatography method for the determination of key cations in flowback water from the Marcellus Shale. Comparative analyses using both standard-bore and capillary columns were conducted to assess performance, linearity, and concordance of results.

Instrumentation

• Thermo Scientific Dionex ICS-5000+ HPIC system with reagent-free eluent generation
• Dionex IonPac CG16 guard and CS16 separation columns (5 mm i.d. and 0.5 mm i.d.)
• Cation suppressors: CERS 500 for standard bore, CCES 300 for capillary mode
• Dionex AS-AP autosampler with conductivity measurement and optional automated dilution
• Dionex EGC-MSA eluent cartridges and CR-CTC II trap columns
• Thermo Scientific Chromeleon 7.2 chromatography data system

Methodology

Flowback water samples were centrifuged and filtered (0.2 μm), then diluted 100-fold with 18 MΩ·cm deionized water. A gradient of methanesulfonic acid (20–55 mM) at 1 mL/min (standard) or 0.01 mL/min (capillary) eluted eight cations within 32 minutes. Calibration standards were prepared from 1000 mg/L stock solutions, covering low and high concentration ranges, with triplicate injections to establish linearity.

Main Results and Discussion

• Baseline resolution of all cations was achieved (Rs ≥3.0 standard bore, ≥4.2 capillary).
• Calibration exhibited excellent linearity (r² ≥0.9997), except ammonium requiring a quadratic fit.
• Major cations in flowback water: sodium (~33 000 mg/L), calcium (~13 000 mg/L), magnesium, strontium, potassium, barium, ammonium and lithium.
• Capillary and standard-bore results agreed within 92–109% across ten recovery fractions, confirming method robustness.
• Ionic concentrations rose sharply between the first two fractions, then increased steadily, reflecting enhanced dissolution with longer shale contact.

Benefits and Practical Applications

This ion chromatography approach provides rapid, sensitive multi-cation analysis with minimal sample volume (0.4 µL) and low waste generation (14–43 mL/day). It supports real-time monitoring for water recycling operations, scale inhibition optimization, and regulatory compliance in hydraulic fracturing workflows.

Future Trends and Opportunities

• Integration of inline conductivity-triggered dilution for fully automated sample preparation.
• Extension to additional trace metals and anions for comprehensive flowback profiling.
• Deployment of high-throughput capillary IC in remote or field laboratories.
• Coupling with mass spectrometry for enhanced speciation and ultratrace detection.

Conclusion

The validated HPIC method enables accurate, reproducible quantification of key cations in shale fracking flowback water. Its adaptability to both standard and capillary formats, combined with high sensitivity and fast run times, makes it an effective tool for optimizing water reuse, minimizing scaling, and supporting sustainable hydraulically fractured gas production.

References

1. The Economist. “The Petrostate of America.” February 15, 2014.
2. Spegele, B.; Scheck, J. “Energy-Hungry China Struggles to Join Shale-Gas Revolution.” Wall Street Journal, September 5, 2013.
3. Trotman, A. “UK Needs 40 Fracking Wells to see if Shale Gas is Viable, Says Lord Browne.” The Telegraph, January 31, 2014.
4. McElroy, M.; Lu, X. “Fracking’s Future: Natural Gas, the Economy, and America’s Energy Prospects.” Harvard Magazine, Jan–Feb 2013, pp. 24–27.
5. FracFocus Chemical Disclosure Registry. “What Chemicals are Used.” Accessed February 11, 2014.
6. Bomgardner, M. “Cleaner Fracking.” C&EN, 2012, 90(142), 13–16.
7. Thermo Fisher Scientific. Technical Note 139, Determination of Anions in Fracking Flowback Water from the Marcellus Shale, 2013.
8. Vidic, R. D.; Brantley, S. L.; Vandenbossche, J. M.; Yoxtheimer, D.; Abad, J. D. “Impact of Shale Gas Development on Regional Water Quality.” Science, 2013, 340, 1235009.
9. Thermo Fisher Scientific. Technical Note 138, Accurate and Precise Automated Dilution and In-Line Conductivity Measurement Using the AS-AP Autosampler Prior to Analysis by Ion Chromatography, 2013.