Performance Characterizations and Comparisons of HPLC Column Options for Ultra High-Speed and High- Resolution HPLC Separations

Importance of the Topic

High-throughput and high-resolution separations are critical in pharmaceutical, environmental and industrial laboratories. Optimizing column particle size, length and bonded phase improves separation speed, resolution and sensitivity while reducing solvent usage and operational costs.

Objectives and Study Overview

• Compare HPLC columns with particle sizes of 5.0, 3.5, 2.5, 2.0, 1.8 μm and monolith formats.
• Characterize performance via Van Deemter plots, theoretical vs actual plate counts, resolution vs analysis time and practical pressure constraints.
• Assess the trade-off between efficiency and analysis time to determine the best particle size and column length combinations.

Methodology and Instrumentation

• Van Deemter analysis on ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C18 columns (4.6×50, 30 mm) comparing 5.0, 3.5 and 1.8 μm particles and monolith under 85:15 ACN:Water at 20 °C over 0.05–5 mL/min.
• Dimensionless reduced plate height plots and kinetic plots (free and constrained) to evaluate efficiency vs analysis time across column lengths.
• Resolution and efficiency tests using RRHT SB-C18, Eclipse Plus C18 and phenyl-hexyl phases at lengths from 15 to 150 mm on Agilent 1100 and 1200 systems.
• Practical assessments including backpressure, reproducibility and scalability with DAD, UV and single-quad ESI-MS detection.

Main Results and Discussion

• Sub-2 μm columns (1.8 μm) on 4.6×50 mm match the efficiency of 150 mm 5 μm columns while reducing runtime by 33%, peak volume by 50% and solvent by 80%.
• Van Deemter curves for smaller particles show flatter profiles and minima at higher flow rates, indicating improved mass transfer.
• Monolith columns perform comparably to 2.0–2.5 μm particles but require further evaluation for small molecules.
• Kinetic plots demonstrate that 1.8 μm particles are optimal for fast separations (<30 min), 3.5 μm for intermediate durations (30–60 min) and 5 μm for extended runs (>60 min) under practical pressure limits.
• Long RRHT 1.8 μm columns enhance resolution at the cost of higher backpressure; series coupling of 3.5 μm columns can achieve very high plate counts within pressure limits.
• Bonded phase selection (C8, C18, phenyl-hexyl) significantly affects retention and runtime, enabling further method optimization.

Benefits and Practical Applications

• Improved sample throughput with high-speed separations.
• Reduced solvent consumption supports green analytical practices.
• Method scalability across lab instruments via particle size adjustments.
• Enhanced sensitivity from sharper peaks benefits trace analyses.
• Balanced pressure and column life for routine QA/QC and research operations.

Future Trends and Opportunities

• Development of superficially porous particles for combined efficiency and lower backpressure.
• Expanded monolith applications for small-molecule UHPLC.
• Integration with high-resolution MS and multidimensional separations for complex samples.
• Machine learning approaches for automated method development and column selection.
• Focus on sustainable, energy-efficient instrumentation and reduced solvent waste.

Conclusion

Dynamic selection of particle size and column length allows laboratories to tailor separations for speed, resolution and pressure constraints. Sub-2 μm particles excel in rapid analyses, mid-sized particles suit intermediate runs and larger particles maximize efficiency in long separations. Optimal bonded phase chemistry further refines selectivity and throughput.

Reference

1. Desmet L et al Anal Chem 2006 78 2150–2162
2. Agilent Application Note 5989-4506EN Analysis of a complex natural product extract from ginseng – Part I