Analysis of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Drinking Water and Milk using LC-MS/MS coupled with Online-SPE Interface
Posters | 2025 | Shimadzu | AOACInstrumentation
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent environmental pollutants used in various industrial and consumer applications such as water repellents, fire-fighting foams and surface treatments. Their strong carbon-fluorine bonds confer high stability, leading to global distribution in water, soil and wildlife. Human exposure via drinking water and food raises health concerns, driving the need for sensitive and reliable analytical methods to monitor PFAS at trace levels.
This study aimed to develop a rapid and automated method for the quantitative determination of 43 PFAS in tap water, bottled drinking water and milk. By integrating online solid-phase extraction (SPE) with LC-MS/MS and automated pretreatment using the SPL-W100 platform, the workflow targeted reduced sample handling, shortened analysis time and compliance with regulatory limits set by bodies such as the US EPA and AOAC.
Sample preparation for water involved mixing equal volumes of sample and methanol, followed by online SPE using a WAX cartridge on the SPL-W100. Milk samples were extracted via a QuEChERS-based protocol: acetonitrile and formic acid addition, Supel QuE cleanup, centrifugation and automated SPE. The purified extracts were analyzed by LC-MS/MS under negative electrospray ionization and MRM mode. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Shim-pack Scepter C18 column with a gradient of aqueous ammonium acetate and acetonitrile over an 11-minute run.
All 43 PFAS eluted within 11 minutes, demonstrating efficient separation. In water matrices, calibration curves showed linearity from 0.0004 to 0.01 µg/kg for PFOA, PFNA, PFHxS and PFOS, and up to 0.1 µg/kg for other PFAS. Spiked recovery tests at 0.0004, 0.004 and 0.001 µg/kg yielded recoveries between 92 and 132 % with relative standard deviations below 15 %. In milk, calibration ranges were 0.005 to 1 µg/kg for major PFAS and 0.05 to 1 µg/kg for others. Recovery studies at 0.01, 0.1 and 1 µg/kg for key analytes produced recoveries of 79 to 113 % and RSDs under 9 %. Limits of quantitation met EPA and AOAC criteria. Analysis of real tap water samples quantified PFOA at 1.09 µg/kg, PFNA at 0.44 µg/kg, PFHxS at 0.40 µg/kg and PFOS at 0.63 µg/kg. No PFAS exceeded detection limits in bottled water and milk.
The combination of online-SPE automated sample preparation and LC-MS/MS provides a robust, rapid and sensitive method for the determination of 43 PFAS in drinking water and milk. The workflow achieves regulatory LOQs, reliable recoveries and reproducibility, supporting routine environmental and food safety surveillance.
LC/MS, LC/MS/MS, LC/QQQ, Sample Preparation
IndustriesEnvironmental, Food & Agriculture
ManufacturerShimadzu
Summary
Significance of PFAS Analysis
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent environmental pollutants used in various industrial and consumer applications such as water repellents, fire-fighting foams and surface treatments. Their strong carbon-fluorine bonds confer high stability, leading to global distribution in water, soil and wildlife. Human exposure via drinking water and food raises health concerns, driving the need for sensitive and reliable analytical methods to monitor PFAS at trace levels.
Objectives and Study Overview
This study aimed to develop a rapid and automated method for the quantitative determination of 43 PFAS in tap water, bottled drinking water and milk. By integrating online solid-phase extraction (SPE) with LC-MS/MS and automated pretreatment using the SPL-W100 platform, the workflow targeted reduced sample handling, shortened analysis time and compliance with regulatory limits set by bodies such as the US EPA and AOAC.
Methodology and Instrumentation
Sample preparation for water involved mixing equal volumes of sample and methanol, followed by online SPE using a WAX cartridge on the SPL-W100. Milk samples were extracted via a QuEChERS-based protocol: acetonitrile and formic acid addition, Supel QuE cleanup, centrifugation and automated SPE. The purified extracts were analyzed by LC-MS/MS under negative electrospray ionization and MRM mode. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Shim-pack Scepter C18 column with a gradient of aqueous ammonium acetate and acetonitrile over an 11-minute run.
Used Instrumentation
- SPL-W100 automated pretreatment system (AiSTI SCIENCE)
- LCMS-8060RX triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Shimadzu)
- Shim-pack Scepter C18 analytical column (100 mm × 2.1 mm I.D., 3 µm)
Main Results and Discussion
All 43 PFAS eluted within 11 minutes, demonstrating efficient separation. In water matrices, calibration curves showed linearity from 0.0004 to 0.01 µg/kg for PFOA, PFNA, PFHxS and PFOS, and up to 0.1 µg/kg for other PFAS. Spiked recovery tests at 0.0004, 0.004 and 0.001 µg/kg yielded recoveries between 92 and 132 % with relative standard deviations below 15 %. In milk, calibration ranges were 0.005 to 1 µg/kg for major PFAS and 0.05 to 1 µg/kg for others. Recovery studies at 0.01, 0.1 and 1 µg/kg for key analytes produced recoveries of 79 to 113 % and RSDs under 9 %. Limits of quantitation met EPA and AOAC criteria. Analysis of real tap water samples quantified PFOA at 1.09 µg/kg, PFNA at 0.44 µg/kg, PFHxS at 0.40 µg/kg and PFOS at 0.63 µg/kg. No PFAS exceeded detection limits in bottled water and milk.
Benefits and Practical Applications
- Automated SPE and pretreatment reduce manual labor and risk of contamination.
- Rapid throughput enables high sample capacity for routine monitoring.
- Sensitivity and precision meet stringent regulatory requirements for water and food safety.
Future Trends and Potential Applications
- Extension to non-targeted screening of emerging PFAS using high-resolution mass spectrometry.
- Miniaturized and on-site SPE platforms for field analysis.
- Integration of data processing algorithms and AI for automated anomaly detection and trend monitoring.
- Application to broader matrices such as soil, biota and industrial effluents.
Conclusion
The combination of online-SPE automated sample preparation and LC-MS/MS provides a robust, rapid and sensitive method for the determination of 43 PFAS in drinking water and milk. The workflow achieves regulatory LOQs, reliable recoveries and reproducibility, supporting routine environmental and food safety surveillance.
Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.
Similar PDF
Development of Profiling Method for Major Lipids in Blood by Triple Quadrupole LC/MS/MS
2021|Shimadzu|Applications
Application News High Performance Liquid Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer LCMS™-8060 Development of Profiling Method for Major Lipids in Blood by Triple Quadrupole LC/MS/MS No. C237 M. Yamada, H. Kubo User Benefits Profiling analysis of the major lipids in blood is…
Key words
phospholipids, phospholipidsprofiling, profilinglipids, lipidsplq, plqlysophospholipids, lysophospholipidsfatty, fattyphospholipid, phospholipidmajor, majorᵏᵑᵏᵘᵮᵣᵆᵑᵖᵽᵒᵽᵏᵖᵽᵎᵽᵐᵎᵽᵒᵇᴾᵕᵔᵔᵌᵓᵓᵜᵐᵖᵑᵌᵐᵓᵆᵋᵇᴾᵡᵣᵘᴾᵑᵓᵌᵎᵆᵓᵌᵎᵎᵇ, ᵏᵑᵏᵘᵮᵣᵆᵑᵖᵽᵒᵽᵏᵖᵽᵎᵽᵐᵎᵽᵒᵇᴾᵕᵔᵔᵌᵓᵓᵜᵐᵖᵑᵌᵐᵓᵆᵋᵇᴾᵡᵣᵘᴾᵑᵓᵌᵎᵆᵓᵌᵎᵎᵇᵏᵑᵏᵘᵮᵣᵆᵑᵖᵽᵒᵽᵏᵖᵽᵎᵽᵐᵎᵽᵒᵇᴾᵕᵔᵔᵌᵓᵓᵜᵑᵎᵑᵌᵐᵓᵆᵋᵇᴾᵡᵣᵘᴾᵐᵗᵌᵎᵆᵓᵌᵎᵎᵇ, ᵏᵑᵏᵘᵮᵣᵆᵑᵖᵽᵒᵽᵏᵖᵽᵎᵽᵐᵎᵽᵒᵇᴾᵕᵔᵔᵌᵓᵓᵜᵑᵎᵑᵌᵐᵓᵆᵋᵇᴾᵡᵣᵘᴾᵐᵗᵌᵎᵆᵓᵌᵎᵎᵇᵏᵑᵔᵘᵮᵣᵆᵑᵖᵽᵔᵽᵏᵔᵽᵎᵽᵐᵐᵽᵔᵇᴾᵕᵔᵐᵌᵓᵎᵜᵐᵓᵓᵌᵐᵓᵆᵋᵇᴾᵡᵣᵘᴾᵑᵑᵌᵎᵆᵐᵎᵌᵎᵎᵇ, ᵏᵑᵔᵘᵮᵣᵆᵑᵖᵽᵔᵽᵏᵔᵽᵎᵽᵐᵐᵽᵔᵇᴾᵕᵔᵐᵌᵓᵎᵜᵐᵓᵓᵌᵐᵓᵆᵋᵇᴾᵡᵣᵘᴾᵑᵑᵌᵎᵆᵐᵎᵌᵎᵎᵇᵏᵑᵔᵘᵮᵣᵆᵑᵖᵽᵔᵽᵏᵔᵽᵎᵽᵐᵐᵽᵔᵇᴾᵕᵔᵐᵌᵓᵎᵜᵑᵐᵕᵌᵐᵓᵆᵋᵇᴾᵡᵣᵘᴾᵐᵖᵌᵎᵆᵐᵎᵌᵎᵎᵇ, ᵏᵑᵔᵘᵮᵣᵆᵑᵖᵽᵔᵽᵏᵔᵽᵎᵽᵐᵐᵽᵔᵇᴾᵕᵔᵐᵌᵓᵎᵜᵑᵐᵕᵌᵐᵓᵆᵋᵇᴾᵡᵣᵘᴾᵐᵖᵌᵎᵆᵐᵎᵌᵎᵎᵇᵏᵑᵖᵘᵮᵣᵆᵑᵖᵽᵔᵽᵏᵖᵽᵐᵽᵐᵎᵽᵒᵇᴾᵕᵔᵐᵌᵓᵎᵜᵐᵕᵗᵌᵐᵓᵆᵋᵇᴾᵡᵣᵘᴾᵑᵑᵌᵎᵆᵐᵎᵌᵎᵎᵇ, ᵏᵑᵖᵘᵮᵣᵆᵑᵖᵽᵔᵽᵏᵖᵽᵐᵽᵐᵎᵽᵒᵇᴾᵕᵔᵐᵌᵓᵎᵜᵐᵕᵗᵌᵐᵓᵆᵋᵇᴾᵡᵣᵘᴾᵑᵑᵌᵎᵆᵐᵎᵌᵎᵎᵇᵏᵑᵖᵘᵮᵣᵆᵑᵖᵽᵔᵽᵏᵖᵽᵐᵽᵐᵎᵽᵒᵇᴾᵕᵔᵐᵌᵓᵎᵜᵑᵎᵑᵌᵐᵓᵆᵋᵇᴾᵡᵣᵘᴾᵐᵗᵌᵎᵆᵐᵎᵌᵎᵎᵇ, ᵏᵑᵖᵘᵮᵣᵆᵑᵖᵽᵔᵽᵏᵖᵽᵐᵽᵐᵎᵽᵒᵇᴾᵕᵔᵐᵌᵓᵎᵜᵑᵎᵑᵌᵐᵓᵆᵋᵇᴾᵡᵣᵘᴾᵐᵗᵌᵎᵆᵐᵎᵌᵎᵎᵇᵐᵑᵘᵮᵣᵆᵑᵖᵽᵒᵇᴾᵕᵔᵖᵌᵓᵓᵜᵔᵐᵕᵌᵓᵓᵆᵉᵇᴾᵡᵣᵘᴾᵋᵐᵏᵌᵎ
Development of Glycosaminoglycans Analysis Method for Dried blood spot as a Second-tier Test in Mucopolysaccharidoses Screening
2022|Shimadzu|Posters
WP 097 Development of Glycosaminoglycans Analysis Method for Dried blood spot as a Second-tier Test in Mucopolysaccharidoses Screening Hironori Kobayashi1,2; Misa Tanaka1; Ryota Okazaki2; Tsubasa Oguni2; Miki Matsui1; Yoshitomo Notsu2; Shozo Yano2; Akihiro Kunisawa3; Michelle Zipse4; Takanari Hattori3; Jun Watanabe3;…
Key words
dihs, dihsksϩ, ksϩmps, mpsmucopolysaccharidoses, mucopolysaccharidosesgag, gaghealthy, healthyconcentration, concentrationsulfate, sulfatelimit, limitpatients, patientsǻdihs, ǻdihsenzyme, enzymechondroitinase, chondroitinaseheparinase, heparinasekeratan
Difference in Quantifiable Concentration Ranges of UV-Vis Spectrophotometer and Fluorescence Spectrophotometer
2020|Shimadzu|Applications
A615 Difference in Quantifiable Concentration Ranges of UV-Vis Spectrophotometer and Fluorescence Spectrophotometer Both the UV-Vis (ultraviolet-visible) spectrophotometer and the fluorescence spectrophotometer are used in quantitative evaluations. Quantitative analysis by the UV-Vis spectrophotometer measures absorbance, which is proportional to concentration, based…
Key words
fluorescence, fluorescencespectrophotometer, spectrophotometerwavelength, wavelengthintensity, intensityconcentration, concentrationrhodamine, rhodaminequantitation, quantitationlower, lowerpitch, pitchvis, vislimit, limitlinearity, linearityreabsorption, reabsorptionlimits, limitsabsorbance
COSMOSIL
|Other|Brochures and specifications
From Kyoto There was a time when gas chromatography was the most powerful separation technique, without any good alternatives. Then liquid chromatography was developed, and it has been gaining popularity since the 1970s. We launched the COSMOSIL Development project to…
Key words
cosmosil, cosmosilproduct, productnumber, numberbuckyprep, buckyprepphase, phasecholester, cholesterinteraction, interactionpacked, packedguard, guardreversed, reversedcolumns, columnscolumn, columngroup, groupseparation, separationdata