Extractables Analysis of Food Contact Materials Using High-Resolution GC/MS and LC/MS

Posters | 2026 | Agilent Technologies | ASMSInstrumentation
LC/MS, LC/MS/MS, LC/TOF, LC/HRMS, GC/MS/MS, GC/MSD, GC/TOF, GC/HRMS
Industries
Food & Agriculture
Manufacturer
Agilent Technologies

Summary

Significance of the topic


Food contact materials (FCM) can release a wide variety of chemical substances — volatile, semi-volatile and non-volatile — into food, potentially impacting food safety and regulatory compliance. Comprehensive and reliable analytical workflows are therefore essential for identification and characterization of extractables and leachables (E&L) from packaging materials. Combining high-resolution gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC/Q-TOF) and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC/Q-TOF) enables broad chemical coverage and high confidence in compound annotation, supporting risk assessment, material selection and quality control in the food packaging sector.

Objectives and study overview


  • Evaluate extraction approaches for different classes of FCM (vacuum-sealer plastic bags, heavy-duty plastic containers, lined paperboard) to maximize recovery of potential migrants.
  • Compare solvent-based extractions and thermal extraction for profiling FCM-derived compounds.
  • Apply high-resolution GC/Q-TOF and LC/Q-TOF with application-specific accurate-mass libraries to improve identification and structural elucidation of extractables.
  • Demonstrate data-processing workflows and the utility of expanded E&L libraries for efficient non-target and targeted annotation.

Methodology and instrumentation


  • Sample preparation: Solvent extractions of FCM using ethanol, ethanol:hexane (1:1), hexane, and isooctane at 70 °C for 2 hours. Extracts were centrifuged and supernatants analyzed. Thermal extractions (direct thermal desorption) were performed for wax liners and coatings (~5 mg samples in TD tubes).
  • GC/Q-TOF analysis: Agilent 7250 GC/Q-TOF with Agilent 8890 GC equipped with DB-5Q (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm). Inlet MMI, splitless 1 μL injection; oven 45 °C (2 min) to 325 °C; He carrier at 1 mL/min. MS acquisition 50–1000 m/z, 5 Hz; EI at 70 eV and low-energy EI (9–15 eV) for improved molecular ion information; EI MS/MS applied for structure elucidation.
  • LC/Q-TOF analysis: Agilent 1290 Infinity II coupled to Revident LC/Q-TOF. Poroshell Aq-C18 (2.1 × 150 mm, 2.7 μm) analytical column at 40 °C; Poroshell EC-C18 guard/short column used; mobile phases water/methanol with 2.5 mM NH4-formate, 0.05% formic acid and 100 μM NH4F. Gradient to 100% B by 16.0 min; flow 0.35 mL/min; injection 5 μL. Dual AJS ESI in positive/auto MS/MS mode with collision energies 10/20/40 eV; MS range 40–1700 m/z; acquisition rates up to 4 spectra/s (MS) and 6 spectra/s (MS/MS).
  • Data processing and libraries: GC/MS processed with MassHunter Qualitative and Unknowns Analysis, and annotations matched to an expanded accurate-mass GC/Q-TOF E&L PCDL (>500 compounds) and NIST23. LC/MS data processed in MassHunter Explorer (iterative MS/MS feature lists) and an FCM-focused LC/MS/MS database built using Agilent ChemVista (integrating public sources and in-house MS/MS spectra). Statistical analysis used Mass Profiler Professional (MPP 15.1) for GC/MS and Explorer 2.0 for LC/MS.

Key results and discussion


  • Library expansion: The GC/Q-TOF E&L PCDL was expanded to >500 compounds, covering antioxidants, UV stabilizers, phthalates, ink/pigment components, polymer additives and items from FDA CLAP. This improved annotation throughput and confidence for GC data.
  • Extraction performance: Solvent effectiveness depended on material type. Ethanol extracts yielded the broadest set of polar and semi-polar migrants for plastic bags and paperboard and produced the greatest number of unique compounds overall. For heavy-duty plastic containers, ethanol:hexane (1:1) provided the best coverage. Isooctane selectively enriched hydrocarbons, tert‑butyl-containing species, branched alcohols and certain phosphites (e.g., Irgafos 168 phosphate).
  • Material-specific profiles: Plastic containers were dominated by hydrocarbons and common antioxidants (Irganox 1076, Irgafos 168, Irgafos 168 phosphate). Plastic bags contained hydrocarbons plus caprolactam, erucamide and cyclic nylon-derived species (e.g., 1,8-diazacyclotetradecane-2,9-dione). Paperboard extracts were the most complex, containing long-chain alkanes, plant-derived diterpenoids and small oxygenates; wax liner thermal extraction revealed distinct wax alkanes (C23–C35), volatile alcohols/aldehydes and conifer-derived diterpenoid acids, aiding source attribution.
  • Notable compound findings: Bisphenol AF was detected across all FCM types; trace bisphenol A appeared in some plastic samples. Antioxidants and phosphite stabilizers were ubiquitous at comparable levels across brands for many samples.
  • Brand variability and LC/MS results: Comparison among bag brands showed differences in dominant chemical classes — one brand was enriched in fatty esters (lubricants/slip agents), another in surfactants and plastic degradation products. LC/MS/MS combined with Explorer filtering (blank removal, 4× fold-change threshold) identified cyclic nylon oligomers unique to a specific sample. Multivariate/statistical tools and volcano-plot analyses were effective to highlight compounds with significant fold-changes between samples.
  • Structure elucidation: Low-energy EI (LEEI) spectra plus EI MS/MS supported molecular-ion prediction and fragment-based structural proposals for unknowns, illustrating a targeted approach for difficult GC-detectable analytes.

Benefits and practical applications of the method


  • Comprehensive coverage: Combining high-resolution GC/Q-TOF (for volatiles and semi-volatiles) with LC/Q-TOF (for polar/non-volatile migrants) delivers broad chemical space coverage in a single workflow strategy.
  • Improved confidence in ID: Accurate-mass libraries (GC and LC) and high-resolution MS/MS reduce false positives and accelerate candidate verification in non-target screening.
  • Material and source attribution: Solvent selection and thermal extraction enable targeted recovery of analyte classes and help trace compounds to surface coatings, wax liners or bulk polymer matrices.
  • Quality control and regulatory assessment: The approach supports E&L screening needed for migration testing, supplier qualification and research of unexpected contaminants or formulation changes.

Future trends and potential applications


  • Library growth and sharing: Continued expansion and community curation of application-specific MS/MS libraries will further improve identifications for packaging-relevant compounds.
  • Integration of in silico tools: Predictive workflows combining computed fragmentation, retention indices and AI-assisted annotation will reduce the time to elucidate unknowns.
  • Standardization and automation: Harmonized sample preparation protocols, automated data-processing pipelines and statistical frameworks will improve reproducibility across labs and support regulatory acceptance.
  • Non-target/HR screening adoption: Wider deployment of HRMS-based non-target screening in industry and regulators will increase detection of low-level or emerging migrants (e.g., novel stabilizers, oligomers, NIAS).
  • Targeted toxicological follow-up: Coupling analytical results with exposure and toxicological assessment pipelines will translate analytical findings into risk-based decisions for packaging selection and reformulation.

Conclusions


This study demonstrates an effective, complementary workflow using high-resolution GC/Q-TOF and LC/Q-TOF for comprehensive extractables analysis of food contact materials. Careful solvent selection and the inclusion of thermal extraction enabled recovery of diverse chemical classes. Expanded application-focused accurate-mass libraries and iterative MS/MS acquisition significantly improved compound annotation and supported identification of both known packaging additives and unexpected migrants. The combined approach is well-suited for E&L screening, comparative product testing and source attribution in FCM analytical programs.

Used instrumentation


  • Agilent 7250 GC/Q-TOF coupled to Agilent 8890 GC; DB-5Q column (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm); MMI inlet (splitless); EI (70 eV) and low-energy EI; EI MS/MS capability.
  • Agilent 1290 Infinity II LC coupled to Revident LC/Q-TOF; Poroshell Aq-C18 (2.1 × 150 mm, 2.7 μm) analytical column and Poroshell EC-C18 guard/short column; Dual AJS ESI source; auto MS/MS acquisition.
  • Thermal desorption unit (GERSTEL TD) for direct thermal extraction of wax liners/paper coatings.
  • Software: MassHunter Qualitative Analysis, Unknowns Analysis, MassHunter Explorer 2.0, Mass Profiler Professional (MPP 15.1), Agilent ChemVista for library management.

Reference


  • Nieto S., Curtis M., Durham S. D., Weil D. Extractables Analysis of Food Contact Materials Using High-Resolution GC/MS and LC/MS. ASMS 2026, Poster Reprint WP‑311. Agilent Technologies, 2026.

Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.

Downloadable PDF for viewing
 

Similar PDF

Toggle
Analysis of Extractables and Leachablesin Catheters Using Accurate Mass Libraries and High-Resolution GC/MS and LC/MS
Poster Reprint ASMS 2025 Poster number TP 317 Analysis of Extractables and Leachables in Catheters Using Accurate Mass Libraries and High-Resolution GC/MS and LC/MS Sofia Nieto; David Weil and Matthew Curtis Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA Introduction Experimental Materials…
Key words
tof, tofcatheter, catheterextractables, extractablescatheters, cathetersaccurate, accuratemass, massmsms, msmsunknowns, unknownsphthalate, phthalatetargeted, targetedcompound, compoundusing, usingsuspect, suspecttemperature, temperaturesirius
Combined LC/MS and GC/MS Approach for Analysis of Extractables and Leachables in Complex Matrices Using High Resolution Mass Spectrometry
Poster Reprint ASMS 2024 Poster number MP 210 Combined LC/MS and GC/MS Approach for Analysis of Extractables and Leachables in Complex Matrices Using High Resolution Mass Spectrometry Sofia Nieto; David Weil; Matthew Curtis and Lee Bertram Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara,…
Key words
formula, formulacatheter, cathetertof, tofcas, casdelta, deltamatch, matchextractables, extractablesname, namefactor, factortemperature, temperaturecompound, compoundnonaromatic, nonaromaticrubber, rubberphthalate, phthalateprofiles
Advanced High-Resolution LC/MS-Based Characterization of Extractables from Food Contact Materials Enabled by a Newly Developed Chemical Database
Poster Reprint ASMS 2026 WP 307 Advanced High-Resolution LC/MS-Based Characterization of Extractables from Food Contact Materials Enabled by a Newly Developed Chemical Database David A. Weil*, Sierra Durham, Matthew Curtis and Sofia Nieto. Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara CA, 95051 Introduction…
Key words
contact, contactexplorer, explorerfood, foodsirius, siriuscompounds, compoundsdatabase, databaserevident, revidentspectra, spectraiterative, iterativemassbank, massbanktof, toffrom, fromfcm, fcmmaterials, materialsmsms
Extractables, Leachables, and Food Contact Materials
Extractables, Leachables, and Food Contact Materials Application Notebook Extractables, Leachables, and Food Contact Materials Testing The safety of pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and foodstuffs may be compromised by chemical compounds in the various types of packaging and food contact materials (FCMs) that…
Key words
packaging, packagingextractables, extractablesmigrants, migrantsunifi, unififood, fooduplc, uplcleachables, leachablesscreening, screeningelucidation, elucidationkitchenware, kitchenwareqtof, qtofmaterials, materialsnon, nonacquity, acquitynias
Other projects
GCMS
ICPMS
Follow us
FacebookX (Twitter)LinkedInYouTube
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike