Demystifying Software Validation: Learn What Software Validation Means for You and Your Lab
Technical notes | 2017 | Agilent TechnologiesInstrumentation
A rigorous approach to software validation is essential in regulated analytical laboratories to ensure data integrity, product quality and compliance with industry regulations. As laboratories increasingly rely on computerized systems for data acquisition, processing and reporting, establishing confidence in software performance and the accuracy of analytical results is critical for patient safety, environmental testing and industrial quality control.
This whitepaper aims to clarify key concepts in software validation, including data integrity, system qualification and process validation. It reviews regulatory requirements from the US Food and Drug Administration and provides guidance on revalidation timing, risk based validation strategies and the value of vendor audits. The paper addresses common questions such as the difference between qualification and validation, the scope of revalidation after software updates and the role of vendor supplied qualification packages.
The paper describes a framework for validation that combines installation qualification and operational qualification with process validation. Core laboratory processes such as chromatography, sample preparation and reporting are inventoried. Instrumentation systems covered include chromatography data systems, liquid and gas chromatographs, laboratory information management systems and data management platforms. The validation lifecycle is aligned with software development lifecycle stages to ensure traceable testing from requirements through final release.
System validation on its own does not guarantee correct results without process validation that covers each laboratory workflow. FDA guidance underlines that each process using a computerized system must be validated to confirm predictable and repeatable outcomes. Changes to systems require formal change control assessments and revalidation activities proportional to risk and scope. Delaying updates can compound validation efforts and increase the chance of overlooking critical corrections. Vendor audits play a pivotal role by providing insight into vendor quality management, software development practices, testing traceability and change control procedures.
By adopting a risk based validation approach, laboratories can prioritize high risk processes that directly impact patient safety and product quality. Integration of vendor audit findings reduces onsite validation effort and improves focus on laboratory specific workflows. Thorough validation and change control ensure that electronic records generated by instruments are complete, accurate and permanently available, in line with regulatory requirements.
Advances in real time data capture and cloud enabled software systems will require updated validation strategies. Focus on continuous validation during the software development lifecycle, automated testing frameworks and stronger vendor collaboration will further streamline validation processes. Emerging standards for data integrity and interoperability of laboratory information systems will expand opportunities for centralized quality monitoring and predictive maintenance of analytical platforms.
Software validation is a multi faceted activity that extends beyond system qualification to encompass each laboratory process. A structured approach combining change control, risk assessment, vendor audits and process validation ensures data integrity and regulatory compliance. Keeping systems current and aligned with user requirements minimizes revalidation burdens and supports consistent, reliable analytical results.
Software
IndustriesPharma & Biopharma
ManufacturerAgilent Technologies
Summary
Significance of the Topic
A rigorous approach to software validation is essential in regulated analytical laboratories to ensure data integrity, product quality and compliance with industry regulations. As laboratories increasingly rely on computerized systems for data acquisition, processing and reporting, establishing confidence in software performance and the accuracy of analytical results is critical for patient safety, environmental testing and industrial quality control.
Objectives and Study Overview
This whitepaper aims to clarify key concepts in software validation, including data integrity, system qualification and process validation. It reviews regulatory requirements from the US Food and Drug Administration and provides guidance on revalidation timing, risk based validation strategies and the value of vendor audits. The paper addresses common questions such as the difference between qualification and validation, the scope of revalidation after software updates and the role of vendor supplied qualification packages.
Methodology and Instrumentation
The paper describes a framework for validation that combines installation qualification and operational qualification with process validation. Core laboratory processes such as chromatography, sample preparation and reporting are inventoried. Instrumentation systems covered include chromatography data systems, liquid and gas chromatographs, laboratory information management systems and data management platforms. The validation lifecycle is aligned with software development lifecycle stages to ensure traceable testing from requirements through final release.
Key Findings and Discussion
System validation on its own does not guarantee correct results without process validation that covers each laboratory workflow. FDA guidance underlines that each process using a computerized system must be validated to confirm predictable and repeatable outcomes. Changes to systems require formal change control assessments and revalidation activities proportional to risk and scope. Delaying updates can compound validation efforts and increase the chance of overlooking critical corrections. Vendor audits play a pivotal role by providing insight into vendor quality management, software development practices, testing traceability and change control procedures.
Benefits and Practical Applications
By adopting a risk based validation approach, laboratories can prioritize high risk processes that directly impact patient safety and product quality. Integration of vendor audit findings reduces onsite validation effort and improves focus on laboratory specific workflows. Thorough validation and change control ensure that electronic records generated by instruments are complete, accurate and permanently available, in line with regulatory requirements.
Future Trends and Opportunities
Advances in real time data capture and cloud enabled software systems will require updated validation strategies. Focus on continuous validation during the software development lifecycle, automated testing frameworks and stronger vendor collaboration will further streamline validation processes. Emerging standards for data integrity and interoperability of laboratory information systems will expand opportunities for centralized quality monitoring and predictive maintenance of analytical platforms.
Conclusion
Software validation is a multi faceted activity that extends beyond system qualification to encompass each laboratory process. A structured approach combining change control, risk assessment, vendor audits and process validation ensures data integrity and regulatory compliance. Keeping systems current and aligned with user requirements minimizes revalidation burdens and supports consistent, reliable analytical results.
References
- McDowall RD FDA Focus on Laboratory Data Integrity Part 1 Scientific Computing September 2013
- US FDA Glossary of Computer System Software Development Terminology
- US FDA Data Integrity and Compliance with Current GMP Guidance for Industry April 2016
- US FDA General Principles of Software Validation Final Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff
- Cahilly M Workshop on Data Integrity and Industry Practice Peking University Beijing June 2015
- Mourrain J Apples and Oranges Comparing Computer Systems Audits Therapeutic Innovation Regulatory Science 2006 Volume 40 Issue 2 Pages 177 183
Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.
Similar PDF
Data Integrity in Pharmaceutical Quality Control Laboratories: What You Need to Know
2016|Agilent Technologies|Technical notes
Data Integrity in Pharmaceutical Quality Control Laboratories: What You Need to Know Whitepaper Author Loren Smith, Agilent Technologies, Inc. Santa Clara, CA USA Data integrity problems in pharmaceutical quality control laboratories are driving more regulatory action than ever before. What…
Key words
audit, auditsoftware, softwareprocedural, proceduralfda, fdavendor, vendorcontrols, controlsdata, datasystem, systemmay, mayintegrity, integrityparticular, particularsop, sopcompliance, compliancetrail, trailshould
Regulatory 101. What is AIQ? Complete DQ/IQ
2015|Agilent Technologies|Presentations
Regulatory 101 What is AIQ ? Complete DQ/IQ Paul Smith Global Strategic Compliance Program Manager Agilent Technologies, Inc. July 9, 2015 Confidentiality Label July 10, 2015 1 10 Steps to a “New Instrument”…. User Requirement Specification URS 1. • •…
Key words
confidentiality, confidentialitylabel, labelqualification, qualificationinstrument, instrumenturs, urswhat, whatapproval, approvalgamp, gampcompliance, complianceaiq, aiqqualify, qualifygpg, gpgrisk, riskcycle, cyclecompanies
Recommendations for Hemp Testing: Laboratory Compliance
2021|Agilent Technologies|Technical notes
Technical Overview Recommendations for Hemp Testing: Laboratory Compliance Author Matthew Abrahms Agilent Technologies, Inc. Abstract Designed as a follow-up to the Agilent United States Hemp Testing white paper,1 this technical overview presents recommendations to the industry on laboratory compliance. These…
Key words
your, yourhemp, hemplaboratory, laboratorydata, dataagilent, agilentrecommendations, recommendationscompliance, compliancecontrols, controlsvalidation, validationqualification, qualificationequipment, equipmentuser, usersystem, systemcomputerized, computerizedtesting
What you should know to assure laboratory data integrity with LabSolutions
2019|Shimadzu|Technical notes
C10G-E071 WHITE PAPER What you should know to assure laboratory data integrity with LabSolutions In order to assure data integrity in life sciences industry laboratories it is necessary to address procedural, behavioural and technical controls. While it is regulated companies…
Key words
data, dataintegrity, integrityshould, shouldcompanies, companiescontrols, controlslaboratory, laboratoryregulated, regulatedlabsolutionscs, labsolutionscsrecords, recordsinstruments, instrumentselectronic, electronicmanagement, managementlabsolutions, labsolutionssystems, systemsassure