Better Separation Resolution of New Biopharmaceutical Modalities through Fine Tuning of the Temperature with CE-SDS

Importance of the Topic

New protein-based biotherapeutics such as nanobodies, multispecific antibodies and fusion proteins require rigorous purity and heterogeneity assessment to meet regulatory and clinical standards. Capillary gel electrophoresis with sodium dodecyl sulfate (CE-SDS) is a gold standard for rapid molecular weight analysis, but resolution can be challenging for novel modalities. Fine tuning separation temperature on advanced CE platforms can enhance discrimination of closely related species.

Objectives and Study Overview

This technical note explores the impact of separation temperature on CE-SDS resolution of both linear polypeptide standards and complex biopharmaceutical samples. The goal is to introduce a temperature optimization strategy on the SCIEX PA 800 Plus system to achieve improved separation of therapeutic proteins and their fragments.

Methodology and Instrumentation

• Sample preparation followed SDS-PAGE protocols using the SCIEX SDS-MW Analysis Assay kit with denaturation at 100 °C.
• CE-SDS was performed on a PA 800 Plus Pharmaceutical Analysis System with a 50 µm ID capillary, 20 cm effective length, operating at 670 V/cm in reversed polarity.
• Separations were conducted at controlled temperatures (20 °C, 30 °C, 40 °C, 50 °C) with UV detection at 214 nm.

Main Results and Discussion

Temperature elevation led to decreased migration times and viscosity-driven mobility changes in the 10–225 kDa polypeptide ladder, yielding predictable activation energies (41.7–44.9 kJ/mol). In contrast, biopharma samples exhibited distinct activation energy requirements due to sequence and post-translational modifications. Resolution between the 10 kDa standard and a PSA-specific nanobody nearly doubled as temperature rose from 20 °C to 50 °C, while resolution between the nanobody and Xolair light chain, and between light and heavy chains of Xolair, declined by 50% and 30%, respectively.

Benefits and Practical Applications

• Customizable temperature settings enable rapid optimization of separation conditions for diverse protein modalities without extensive method redevelopment.
• Enhanced resolution supports improved accuracy in purity and heterogeneity assessment critical for quality control and regulatory submissions.
• The PA 800 Plus platform’s precise thermal control facilitates reproducible and high-throughput CE-SDS analyses.

Future Trends and Applications

• Integration of temperature optimization with advanced data analytics and automated workflows to further streamline method development.
• Extension of temperature tuning strategies to other CE-based assays for charge variants, glycoform profiling and native protein separations.
• Development of predictive models linking activation energies to sequence or modification profiles for rational method design.

Conclusion

Fine tuning separation temperature on CE-SDS significantly influences the electrophoretic behavior of protein–SDS complexes, enabling tailored resolution improvements for both standard polypeptides and complex biotherapeutic mixtures. The approach offers a straightforward path to optimize purity analysis for emerging protein modalities using the SCIEX PA 800 Plus system.

References

1. Steeland S, Vandenbroucke RE, Libert C. Nanobodies as therapeutics: big opportunities for small antibodies. Drug Discov Today. 2016;21(7):1076-113.
2. Runcie K, et al. Bi-specific and tri-specific antibodies–the next big thing in solid tumor therapeutics. Mol Med. 2018;24(1):50.
3. Onuora S. Engineered fusion protein disrupts CD40 signalling. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2019;15(7):385.
4. Sanger-van de Griend CE. CE-SDS method development, validation, and best practice—An overview. Electrophoresis. 2019.
5. Beckman J, et al. Purity Determination by Capillary Electrophoresis Sodium Hexadecyl Sulfate (CE-SHS): A Novel Application For Therapeutic Protein Characterization. Anal Chem. 2018;90(4):2542-2547.
6. Liu Y, et al. Methods and compositions for capillary electrophoresis (CE). 2003.
7. Guttman A. On the separation mechanism of capillary sodium dodecyl sulfate-gel electrophoresis of proteins. Electrophoresis. 1995;16(4):611-616.
8. Filep C, Guttman A. The Effect of Temperature in Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Capillary Gel Electrophoresis of Protein Therapeutics. Anal Chem. 2020;92(5):4023-4028.
9. Cottet H, Gareil P. On the use of the activation energy concept to investigate analyte and network deformations in entangled polymer solution capillary electrophoresis of synthetic polyelectrolytes. Electrophoresis. 2001;22(4):684-691.
10. Arrhenius SA. Über die Dissociationswärme und den Einfluss der Temperatur auf den Dissociationsgrad der Elektrolyte. Z Phys Chem. 1889;4:96–116.