Mycotoxin Analysis in Infant Formula Using Captiva EMR—Lipid Cleanup and LC/MS/MS
Applications | 2019 | Agilent TechnologiesInstrumentation
Infant formula is a highly regulated food matrix requiring sensitive and accurate detection of trace mycotoxins. Due to its high protein and lipid content, traditional sample preparation can struggle to remove interfering compounds, complicating analysis at low concentration levels.
This study evaluates a streamlined workflow combining QuEChERS extraction with Agilent Captiva EMR—Lipid cleanup for simultaneous determination of 13 mycotoxins in both powdered and liquid infant formulas. Key goals include method validation, assessment of lipid removal efficiency, and comparison with a competing pass-through cleanup product.
A QuEChERS protocol was applied using acetonitrile fortified with 2 % formic acid and extraction salts (MgSO₄, NaCl). After centrifugation, the acetonitrile layer was diluted and passed through Captiva EMR—Lipid 3 mL or 6 mL tubes by gravity followed by vacuum. The cleaned extract was prepared with ammonium formate/acetic acid solution for LC/MS/MS analysis.
Calibration curves for all 13 mycotoxins exhibited linearity (R² ≥ 0.992). Method recoveries ranged from 70.4 % to 106.8 % with RSD < 18 % across low, mid, and high spike levels. Incorporation of 2 % formic acid enhanced fumonisin extraction. GC/MS data demonstrated approximately 90 % lipid removal post-Captiva EMR—Lipid cleanup. Comparative testing against a competitive pass-through sorbent showed superior recovery—especially for hydrophobic analytes such as zearalenone, ochratoxin A, and sterigmatocystin—while maintaining precision.
The described workflow requires minimal specialized equipment and expertise, offering food testing laboratories a robust, high-throughput approach for multiclass mycotoxin analysis in fatty matrices. Its selectivity reduces matrix effects and extends instrument uptime by preventing lipid buildup.
Emerging applications may include expansion to other multiclass contaminant panels such as veterinary drugs and pesticide metabolites. Integration with automated sample-prep platforms and high-resolution mass spectrometry could further enhance throughput and selectivity. Continued development of sorbent chemistries promises broader matrix compatibility and direct-injection capabilities.
The combination of QuEChERS extraction with Captiva EMR—Lipid cleanup and LC/MS/MS detection provides a reliable, sensitive, and efficient method for quantifying low-level mycotoxins in infant formula. This approach simplifies sample preparation while delivering high recovery, excellent precision, and effective lipid removal.
1. Jard G., et al. Review of mycotoxin reduction in food and feed: from prevention in the field to detoxification by adsorption or transformation. Food Addit. Contam. Part A. 2011, 28(11):1590–1609.
2. U.S. FDA. Guidance for Industry: Action Levels for Poisonous or Deleterious Substances in Human Food and Animal Feed. 2011.
3. European Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. 2006.
4. Zhang K., et al. Determining Mycotoxins in Baby Foods and Animal Feeds Using Stable Isotope Dilution and LC-MS/MS. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62(39):8935–8943.
5. Zhao L., Lucas D. Multiclass Multiresidue Veterinary Drug Analysis in Beef Using Agilent Captiva EMR—Lipid Cartridge Cleanup and LC/MS/MS. Agilent Technologies Application Note 5991-8598EN, 2019.
6. Lucas D., Zhao L. Multiclass Mycotoxin Analysis in Cheese Using Agilent Captiva EMR—Lipid Cleanup and LC/MS/MS. Agilent Technologies Application Note 5991-8694EN, 2019.
Sample Preparation, Consumables, LC/MS, LC/MS/MS, LC/QQQ
IndustriesFood & Agriculture
ManufacturerAgilent Technologies
Summary
Importance of the Topic
Infant formula is a highly regulated food matrix requiring sensitive and accurate detection of trace mycotoxins. Due to its high protein and lipid content, traditional sample preparation can struggle to remove interfering compounds, complicating analysis at low concentration levels.
Study Objectives and Overview
This study evaluates a streamlined workflow combining QuEChERS extraction with Agilent Captiva EMR—Lipid cleanup for simultaneous determination of 13 mycotoxins in both powdered and liquid infant formulas. Key goals include method validation, assessment of lipid removal efficiency, and comparison with a competing pass-through cleanup product.
Methodology
A QuEChERS protocol was applied using acetonitrile fortified with 2 % formic acid and extraction salts (MgSO₄, NaCl). After centrifugation, the acetonitrile layer was diluted and passed through Captiva EMR—Lipid 3 mL or 6 mL tubes by gravity followed by vacuum. The cleaned extract was prepared with ammonium formate/acetic acid solution for LC/MS/MS analysis.
Instrumentation
- Liquid Chromatography: Agilent 1290 Infinity II system with Poroshell 120 EC-C18 analytical (2.1 × 100 mm, 2.7 µm) and guard columns, operated at 40 °C, gradient elution (5 mM ammonium formate/0.1 % formic acid and ACN:methanol/0.1 % formic acid), 0.5 mL/min flow.
- Mass Spectrometry: Agilent 6490 triple quadrupole with Jet Stream source, dynamic MRM in positive/negative mode, optimized gas temperatures, flows, voltages, and collision energies for each mycotoxin.
- GC/MS Full Scan: Employed to quantify lipid removal by comparing chromatographic peak areas before and after cleanup.
Main Results and Discussion
Calibration curves for all 13 mycotoxins exhibited linearity (R² ≥ 0.992). Method recoveries ranged from 70.4 % to 106.8 % with RSD < 18 % across low, mid, and high spike levels. Incorporation of 2 % formic acid enhanced fumonisin extraction. GC/MS data demonstrated approximately 90 % lipid removal post-Captiva EMR—Lipid cleanup. Comparative testing against a competitive pass-through sorbent showed superior recovery—especially for hydrophobic analytes such as zearalenone, ochratoxin A, and sterigmatocystin—while maintaining precision.
Benefits and Practical Applications
The described workflow requires minimal specialized equipment and expertise, offering food testing laboratories a robust, high-throughput approach for multiclass mycotoxin analysis in fatty matrices. Its selectivity reduces matrix effects and extends instrument uptime by preventing lipid buildup.
Future Trends and Potential Applications
Emerging applications may include expansion to other multiclass contaminant panels such as veterinary drugs and pesticide metabolites. Integration with automated sample-prep platforms and high-resolution mass spectrometry could further enhance throughput and selectivity. Continued development of sorbent chemistries promises broader matrix compatibility and direct-injection capabilities.
Conclusion
The combination of QuEChERS extraction with Captiva EMR—Lipid cleanup and LC/MS/MS detection provides a reliable, sensitive, and efficient method for quantifying low-level mycotoxins in infant formula. This approach simplifies sample preparation while delivering high recovery, excellent precision, and effective lipid removal.
References
1. Jard G., et al. Review of mycotoxin reduction in food and feed: from prevention in the field to detoxification by adsorption or transformation. Food Addit. Contam. Part A. 2011, 28(11):1590–1609.
2. U.S. FDA. Guidance for Industry: Action Levels for Poisonous or Deleterious Substances in Human Food and Animal Feed. 2011.
3. European Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. 2006.
4. Zhang K., et al. Determining Mycotoxins in Baby Foods and Animal Feeds Using Stable Isotope Dilution and LC-MS/MS. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62(39):8935–8943.
5. Zhao L., Lucas D. Multiclass Multiresidue Veterinary Drug Analysis in Beef Using Agilent Captiva EMR—Lipid Cartridge Cleanup and LC/MS/MS. Agilent Technologies Application Note 5991-8598EN, 2019.
6. Lucas D., Zhao L. Multiclass Mycotoxin Analysis in Cheese Using Agilent Captiva EMR—Lipid Cleanup and LC/MS/MS. Agilent Technologies Application Note 5991-8694EN, 2019.
Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.
Similar PDF
Mycotoxin Analysis in Peanut Butter Using Captiva EMR—Lipid Cleanup and LC/MS/MS
2019|Agilent Technologies|Applications
Application Note Food Testing & Agriculture Mycotoxin Analysis in Peanut Butter Using Captiva EMR—Lipid Cleanup and LC/MS/MS Author Derick Lucas Agilent Technologies, Inc. Abstract Several countries regulate the levels of mycotoxins in foods. With peanut butter, contamination by mycotoxins can…
Key words
lipid, lipidemr, emrpeanut, peanutochratoxin, ochratoxincleanup, cleanupbutter, buttercaptiva, captivaareablank, areablanksterigmatocystin, sterigmatocystinmycophenolic, mycophenolicmycotoxins, mycotoxinszearalenone, zearalenonematrix, matrixremoval, removalconfiguration
Multiclass Mycotoxin Analysis in Cheese Using Agilent Captiva EMR—Lipid Cleanup and LC/MS/MS
2017|Agilent Technologies|Applications
Application Note Food Multiclass Mycotoxin Analysis in Cheese Using Agilent Captiva EMR—Lipid Cleanup and LC/MS/MS Authors Abstract Derick Lucas and Limian Zhao Agilent Technologies, Inc. Agilent Captiva EMR—Lipid, a lipid removal product, was used for the cleanup of blue and…
Key words
captiva, captivalipid, lipidemr, emrparmesan, parmesancheese, cheeseotb, otbcleanup, cleanupstc, stcextractive, extractivezon, zonota, otarecovery, recoveryremoval, removalmpa, mpamycotoxins
Sample Clean-Up in the Fast Lane 
2018|Agilent Technologies|Presentations
Sample Clean-Up in the Fast Lane Alexander Ucci Online Application Engineer April 4, 2018 1 For Research Use Only, Not for Diagnostic Procedures Why Perform Sample Clean-Up? • To acquire desired sensitivity/selectivity • To reduce contamination/carryover issues • Use of…
Key words
lipid, lipidemr, emrcaptiva, captivaaflatoxin, aflatoxinlipids, lipidsfumonisin, fumonisinprecipitation, precipitationcheese, cheeseochratoxi, ochratoxisorbent, sorbentporoshell, poroshellprotein, proteinremoval, removalwhole, wholeblood
Complex Matrices: Minimizing Lipids, Maximizing Recovery - Food Testing Application Compendium: Volume 3
2018|Agilent Technologies|Guides
Complex Matrices: Minimizing Lipids, Maximizing Recovery Food Testing Application Compendium: Volume 3 Complex Samples Don’t Have to Complicate Your Analysis Reducing matrix interference is a must for maintaining sensitivity standards—particularly for multiresidue, multiclass analysis of food samples. Minimize interferences in…
Key words
emr, emrlipid, lipidcleanup, cleanupmatrix, matrixelut, elutbond, bondpositive, positiveremoval, removalavocado, avocadocounts, countspos, posenhanced, enhancedcaptiva, captivaagilent, agilentacquisition