FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE RECOVERY OF HYDROPHOBIC PEPTIDES DURING LC-MS SAMPLE HANDLING

Importance of the Topic

Reliable quantitation of proteins and peptides by LC-MS is essential in bioanalysis, pharmaceutical research, and quality control. Non-specific binding (NSB) of hydrophobic peptides to sample containers can cause significant analyte loss, leading to compromised sensitivity, poor reproducibility, and inaccurate calibration. A systematic understanding of factors influencing NSB is crucial to optimize sample handling and ensure robust quantitative assays.

Objectives and Study Overview

This work evaluates experimental parameters that affect peptide recovery during LC-MS sample handling. The study aims to identify key factors—container material, sample matrix additives, storage temperature and time, residual volume—and to develop practical guidelines for minimizing NSB without relying on blocking agents that may interfere with downstream analyses.

Methodology and Instrumentation

Samples: Five model peptides (desmopressin, teriparatide, glucagon, insulin, melittin) at 1 ng/mL in 80:20 water/acetonitrile with either 0.2% TFA or FA; reference solutions included 0.1% rat plasma.

Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Setup:

• LC: ACQUITY UPLC I-Class, fixed-loop injector, CORTECS C18+ column (2.1×50 mm, 1.6 µm, 90 Å) at 55 °C
• MS: Xevo TQ-S with Universal Source
• Injection: 10 µL full loop; flow rate 0.5 mL/min; gradient 15–45% B in 1.2 min, wash at 95% B, total cycle 2.8 min
• Mobile phases: A = 0.1% FA in water; B = 0.1% FA in acetonitrile

Main Results and Discussion

Container Materials:

• Hydrophobic peptides adhere strongly to glass and polypropylene, especially melittin and glucagon (complete loss).
• Low-binding vessels (e.g., QuanRecovery plates/vials) preserved >90% recovery.

Sample Matrix Additives:

• TFA lowered peptide recovery despite improving chromatographic performance; FA provided better compatibility.
• High organic content in the sample solvent reduced NSB but may exceed LC compatibility; an 80:20 water/acetonitrile ratio balanced binding reduction and chromatographic requirements.

Storage Temperature and Time:

• Higher temperatures accelerated peptide losses; 4 °C storage minimized NSB over 24–75 h.
• Losses increased with time; hydrophobic peptides showed the fastest decline in recovery.

Residual Volume:

• Containers with large residual dead‐volume prevented full sample retrieval, exacerbating NSB losses in low-volume assays.

Guideline Development (Three Steps):

1. Select a low‐binding container suited to peptide properties (avoid glass for basic/hydrophobic analytes).
2. Choose a sample solvent that reduces NSB (80:20 water/acetonitrile with 0.1% FA) and remains LC‐compatible.
3. Optimize storage conditions: keep samples at low temperature (4 °C), limit storage duration, and use vessels with minimal residual volume.

Benefits and Practical Applications

The proposed workflow enhances peptide recovery, sensitivity, and reproducibility in LC-MS quantitation without introducing exogenous blocking agents. Laboratories can implement straightforward adjustments in container selection, solvent composition, and storage protocols to mitigate NSB effects, streamline method development, and improve data reliability.

Future Trends and Potential Applications

Advances in container surface coatings and novel low-binding materials will further reduce NSB. Integration of automated sample handling platforms with controlled environments may standardize storage parameters. Expansion of this approach to protein complexes, antibody–drug conjugates, and high-throughput screening formats will broaden its utility in proteomics and biopharmaceutical analytics.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that meticulous selection of sample containers, solvent systems, and storage conditions can substantially mitigate non-specific peptide losses. The three‐step guideline offers a practical framework to achieve consistent, high-recovery LC-MS analyses without compromising downstream assay performance.

References

1. Jung MC, Achieving Maximum Protein and Peptide Recovery, Sensitivity, and Reproducibility using QuanRecovery Vials and Plates, Waters White Paper (2019).
2. Bobaly B, Sipko E, Fekete J, Challenges in liquid chromatographic characterization of proteins, J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 1032 (2016) 3–22.
3. Rabe M, Verdes D, Seeger S, Understanding protein adsorption phenomena at solid surfaces, Adv Colloid Interface Sci 162 (2011) 87–106.