LCMS
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike

Aflatoxin Analysis in Infant Formula with Enhanced Matrix Removal— Lipid by LC/MS/MS

Applications | 2016 | Agilent TechnologiesInstrumentation
Sample Preparation, LC/MS, LC/MS/MS, LC/QQQ
Industries
Food & Agriculture
Manufacturer
Agilent Technologies

Summary

Importance of the Topic


Aflatoxins are highly toxic fungal metabolites that frequently contaminate foodstuffs and pose serious health risks, especially to infants. Regulatory agencies in the European Union and United States enforce extremely low maximum levels of aflatoxin M1 in dairy-based products, demanding analytical methods that combine low limits of quantitation with robust cleanup of lipid-rich matrices.

Study Objectives and Overview


This work describes a rapid, sensitive approach for quantifying five aflatoxins (M1, G2, G1, B2, B1) in liquid infant formula. The goals were to achieve recoveries and precision suitable for QC laboratories, extend LOQs below regulatory thresholds, and simplify sample preparation for routine implementation.

Methodology and Instrumentation


Sample preparation relies on a QuEChERS extraction with acetonitrile and nonbuffered salt packets, followed by dispersive SPE cleanup using Agilent Bond Elut Enhanced Matrix Removal—Lipid (EMR-Lipid) and MgSO4 polishing. A tenfold concentration step was introduced to lower LOQs. Chromatographic separation was performed on an Agilent 1290 Infinity LC system with a Poroshell 120 SB-C18 column (2.1×100 mm, 2.7 µm) at 40 °C and 0.3 mL/min flow. Mass detection utilized an Agilent 6460A triple quadrupole with Jet Stream ESI in positive mode and dynamic MRM transitions for each analyte.

Results and Discussion


Matrix removal by EMR-Lipid dramatically reduced lipid-derived interferences, as shown by full‐scan overlays. Limits of quantitation were established at 0.01 ng/mL for M1 and 0.05 ng/mL for other aflatoxins, below both EU and FDA action levels. Recoveries ranged from 88% to 113% across three QC levels, with RSDs below 14%. Matrix effects remained within ±13%, indicating effective cleanup. Analysis of a certified milk powder incurred sample yielded accurate quantitation of aflatoxin M1 at 0.0101 ng/mL.

Benefits and Practical Applications


  • Straightforward sample workflow requiring minimal specialized equipment.
  • High recovery and precision satisfy stringent regulatory requirements.
  • Enhanced instrument performance and reduced maintenance due to thorough lipid removal.
  • Adaptable to multiresidue testing in various high‐fat food matrices.

Future Trends and Applications


Future developments may include extending EMR-Lipid cleanup to other mycotoxin families, integration with automated high‐throughput platforms, and coupling with high‐resolution mass spectrometry for non‐targeted screening and confirmatory analysis.

Conclusion


This method offers a robust, sensitive, and reproducible solution for regulatory‐compliant aflatoxin monitoring in infant formula, balancing simplicity with high analytical performance.

References


  1. Jard G.; Liboz T.; Mathieu F.; Guyonvarc’h G.; Lebrihi A. Review of mycotoxin reduction in food and feed. Food Addit. Contam. A 2011, 28(11), 1590–1609.
  2. Wang H.; Zhou X.J.; Liu Y.Q.; Yang H.M.; Guo Q.L. Determination of aflatoxin M1 in milk by LC-MS/MS. Food Addit. Contam. A 2010, 27(9), 1261–1265.
  3. Sartori A.V.; Swensson de Mattos J.; Paulino de Moraes M.H.; Wanderley de Nóbrega A. QuEChERS and UHPLC-MS/MS for aflatoxins in dairy. Food Anal. Methods 2015, 8(9), 2321–2330.
  4. FDA. Guidance for Industry: Action Levels for Toxic Substances; 2015.
  5. EU Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006; 2006.
  6. Meucci V.; Razzuoli E.; Soldani G.; Massart F. Aflatoxin M1 in infant formula milks in Italy. Food Addit. Contam. A 2010, 27(1), 64–71.
  7. Dragacci S.; Grosso F.; Gilbert J. Immunoaffinity cleanup and LC determination of aflatoxin M1. J. AOAC Int. 2001, 84(2), 437–443.
  8. Iha M.H.; Barbosa C.B.; Okada I.A.; Trucksess M.W. Aflatoxin M1 in Brazilian dairy products. Food Control 2011, 22, 1971–1974.
  9. Shundo L.; Sabino M. Determination of aflatoxin M1 by IAC-TLC/HPLC. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2006, 37, 164–167.
  10. Bursić V.P.; Vuković G.Lj.; Jajić I.M.; Lazić S.D.; Cara M.H.; Čolović R.R.; Vukmirović Đ.M. QuEChERS for aflatoxins in maize. J. Nat. Sci. Matica Srpska 2013, 124, 51–57.
  11. Filigenzi M.S.; Ehrke N.; Aston L.S.; Poppenga R.H. Rapid screening for contaminants by QuEChERS and HRMS. Food Addit. Contam. A 2011, 28(10), 1324–1339.
  12. Zhao L.; Lucas D. Multiresidue pesticide analysis in avocado using EMR-Lipid. Agilent Appl. Note 2015, 5991-6098EN.
  13. Zhao L.; Lucas D. Veterinary drugs in bovine liver by LC/MS/MS. Agilent Appl. Note 2015, 5991-6096EN.
  14. FDA CPG Sec. 527.400 Whole Milk, etc.; 2015.
  15. FDA CPG Sec. 555.400 Foods – Adulteration with Aflatoxin; 2015.
  16. FDA CPG Sec. 683.100 Action Levels for Aflatoxins in Animal Feeds; 2015.
  17. Josephs R.D.; Koeber R.; Bernreuther A.; Schimmel H.; Ulberth F. EUR Report 21202 EN – ERM-BD283 Certification. JRC IRMM 2005.

Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.

Downloadable PDF for viewing
 

Similar PDF

Toggle
Complex Matrices: Minimizing Lipids, Maximizing Recovery - Food Testing Application Compendium: Volume 3
Complex Matrices: Minimizing Lipids, Maximizing Recovery Food Testing Application Compendium: Volume 3 Complex Samples Don’t Have to Complicate Your Analysis Reducing matrix interference is a must for maintaining sensitivity standards—particularly for multiresidue, multiclass analysis of food samples. Minimize interferences in…
Key words
emr, emrlipid, lipidcleanup, cleanupmatrix, matrixelut, elutbond, bondpositive, positiveremoval, removalavocado, avocadocounts, countspos, posenhanced, enhancedagilent, agilentcaptiva, captivaacquisition
Determination of Mycotoxins in Peanuts With Enhanced Matrix Removal—Lipid by LC/MS/MS
Determination of Mycotoxins in Peanuts With Enhanced Matrix Removal—Lipid by LC/MS/MS Application Note Food Testing Author Abstract Andy Zhai This application note describes a method for the quantitative determination of Agilent Technologies 12 mycotoxins in peanut. The sample was initially…
Key words
lipid, lipidmycotoxins, mycotoxinsmpa, mpaneo, neoemr, emrelut, elutquechers, quecherspeanut, peanutbond, bondagilent, agilentextraction, extractionfrag, fragcleanup, cleanupmin, minmycotoxin
Mycotoxin Analysis in Infant Formula Using Captiva EMR—Lipid Cleanup and LC/MS/MS
Application Note Food Testing & Agriculture Mycotoxin Analysis in Infant Formula Using Captiva EMR—Lipid Cleanup and LC/MS/MS Author Derick Lucas Agilent Technologies, Inc. Abstract Several countries regulate the levels of mycotoxins in foods. However, the complexity of certain foodstuffs in…
Key words
emr, emrlipid, lipidcaptiva, captivaochratoxin, ochratoxinsterigmatocystin, sterigmatocystinmycophenolic, mycophenolicinfant, infantcleanup, cleanupzearalenone, zearalenoneareablank, areablankanalyte, analytemycotoxins, mycotoxinsformula, formulamycotoxin, mycotoxinrecovery
Mycotoxin Analysis in Peanut Butter Using Captiva EMR—Lipid Cleanup and LC/MS/MS
Application Note Food Testing & Agriculture Mycotoxin Analysis in Peanut Butter Using Captiva EMR—Lipid Cleanup and LC/MS/MS Author Derick Lucas Agilent Technologies, Inc. Abstract Several countries regulate the levels of mycotoxins in foods. With peanut butter, contamination by mycotoxins can…
Key words
lipid, lipidemr, emrpeanut, peanutochratoxin, ochratoxincleanup, cleanupbutter, buttercaptiva, captivaareablank, areablanksterigmatocystin, sterigmatocystinmycophenolic, mycophenolicmycotoxins, mycotoxinszearalenone, zearalenonematrix, matrixremoval, removalconfiguration
Other projects
GCMS
ICPMS
Follow us
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike