Best Practices for Optimizing PFAS ANALYSIS
Others | | ShimadzuInstrumentationIndustries
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) pose significant health and environmental risks due to their persistence and widespread usage. Robust PFAS analysis is crucial for accurate exposure assessment and regulatory compliance. This summary presents best practices for contamination control and data quality from sample collection in the field to instrumental quantitation in the laboratory.
The main goal is to define streamlined protocols that minimize PFAS background contamination and ensure reliable analytical results. Key areas addressed include selection of field and lab materials, decontamination procedures, sample preparation strategies, and optimized LC-MS/MS configurations.
Field sampling employs PFAS-free personal gear such as washed cotton clothing and polyurethane outerwear. HDPE or polypropylene bottles with matching caps and PFAS-free tubing prevent cross-contamination during collection and SPE pre-concentration. Decontamination uses Alconox or Liquinox and verified PFAS-free municipal water, with scrub brushes made of polyethylene or PVC. Sample extracts are mixed (vortexed) prior to injection to maintain homogeneity.
Instrumental recommendations include removing PTFE components, bypassing the degasser when feasible, and installing a solvent delay column between the mixer and autosampler to separate system-derived PFAS background. Shimadzu’s LC-MS/MS platforms, featuring ultrafast pumping and ion-focusing technology, deliver high-sensitivity PFAS detection.
Application of these practices yields significantly reduced background signals and consistent recovery of long-chain and short-chain PFAS. Optimal solvent composition (50–70% methanol in water) prevents adsorption losses in vials, while pretesting all consumables avoids false positives.
These optimized workflows improve analytical accuracy and throughput, supporting environmental monitoring, drinking water analysis, and QA/QC in industrial laboratories. Standardized procedures enhance interlaboratory reproducibility and regulatory confidence.
Development of PFAS-free consumables, novel SPE sorbents, and next-generation ionization technologies promise faster, more comprehensive PFAS profiling. Ongoing collaboration on standardized methods and emerging high-throughput platforms will expand application to complex matrices.
Implementing dedicated field-to-lab protocols, stringent decontamination, and tailored LC-MS/MS setups is essential for contamination-free PFAS analysis. These best practices provide a holistic framework for accurate, reliable PFAS quantification in diverse environmental and industrial contexts.
Environmental
ManufacturerShimadzu
Summary
Importance of the Topic
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) pose significant health and environmental risks due to their persistence and widespread usage. Robust PFAS analysis is crucial for accurate exposure assessment and regulatory compliance. This summary presents best practices for contamination control and data quality from sample collection in the field to instrumental quantitation in the laboratory.
Study Objectives and Overview
The main goal is to define streamlined protocols that minimize PFAS background contamination and ensure reliable analytical results. Key areas addressed include selection of field and lab materials, decontamination procedures, sample preparation strategies, and optimized LC-MS/MS configurations.
Methodology and Used Instrumentation
Field sampling employs PFAS-free personal gear such as washed cotton clothing and polyurethane outerwear. HDPE or polypropylene bottles with matching caps and PFAS-free tubing prevent cross-contamination during collection and SPE pre-concentration. Decontamination uses Alconox or Liquinox and verified PFAS-free municipal water, with scrub brushes made of polyethylene or PVC. Sample extracts are mixed (vortexed) prior to injection to maintain homogeneity.
Instrumental recommendations include removing PTFE components, bypassing the degasser when feasible, and installing a solvent delay column between the mixer and autosampler to separate system-derived PFAS background. Shimadzu’s LC-MS/MS platforms, featuring ultrafast pumping and ion-focusing technology, deliver high-sensitivity PFAS detection.
Main Results and Discussion
Application of these practices yields significantly reduced background signals and consistent recovery of long-chain and short-chain PFAS. Optimal solvent composition (50–70% methanol in water) prevents adsorption losses in vials, while pretesting all consumables avoids false positives.
Benefits and Practical Applications
These optimized workflows improve analytical accuracy and throughput, supporting environmental monitoring, drinking water analysis, and QA/QC in industrial laboratories. Standardized procedures enhance interlaboratory reproducibility and regulatory confidence.
Future Trends and Opportunities
Development of PFAS-free consumables, novel SPE sorbents, and next-generation ionization technologies promise faster, more comprehensive PFAS profiling. Ongoing collaboration on standardized methods and emerging high-throughput platforms will expand application to complex matrices.
Conclusion
Implementing dedicated field-to-lab protocols, stringent decontamination, and tailored LC-MS/MS setups is essential for contamination-free PFAS analysis. These best practices provide a holistic framework for accurate, reliable PFAS quantification in diverse environmental and industrial contexts.
Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.
Similar PDF
Best practices for monitoring PFAS contamination in a routine shared-space commercial laboratory
2023|Waters|Technical notes
[ WHITE PAPER ] Best practices for monitoring PFAS contamination in a routine shared-space commercial laboratory Nicola Dreolin, Henry Foddy, Kari Organtini, Stuart Adams, Ken Rosnack, Peter Hancock Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA and Waters Corporation, Wilmslow, UK. ABSTRACT Per-…
Key words
pfas, pfascontamination, contaminationshared, sharedpaper, paperpractices, practicesbottle, bottlemethanol, methanolintensity, intensitylaboratory, laboratorywhite, whitecommercial, commercialwater, waterspace, spacehydroxide, hydroxideretention
Sampling Recommendations for PFAS to Maximize Data Quality
2023||Technical notes
EnviroMail™ / Europe Issue 2 / May 2023 Sampling Recommendations for PFAS to Maximize Data Quality Accurate PFAS analysis begins already with proper collection of samples. ALS Recommended Procedure for Sample Collection, Storage, and Transport to ALS Laboratories The laboratories…
Key words
pfas, pfassampling, samplingals, alscontainers, containerspolyethylene, polyethylenetested, testedtransport, transportcompounds, compoundsunsuitable, unsuitabledensity, densityhdpe, hdpegloves, gloveslaboratories, laboratoriesmaterials, materialscontamination
WHICH LEVEL OF BIOSAFE LAB DO YOU NEED?
2019|ELGA LabWater|Brochures and specifications
WHICH LEVEL OF BIOSAFE LAB DO YOU NEED? Dedicated to Discovery WATER TECHNOLOGIES 2 Dedicated to Discovery Inside 3 4 6 Introduction The level of biosafe lab you need Risk criteria Establishing the correct levels of containment Managing risk •…
Key words
agents, agentsbiosafety, biosafetyrisk, riskinfectious, infectiousdiscovery, discoverydedicated, dedicatedbsc, bscdisease, diseasebiosafe, biosafesars, sarslaboratory, laboratorycontainment, containmentexposure, exposurelab, labroutes
Ultra-fast LC-MS/MS Analysis of PFAS in Environmental Samples
2019|Shimadzu|Technical notes
C10G-E074 WHITE PAPER Ultra-fast LC-MS/MS Analysis of PFAS in Environmental Samples There is increasing concern about the persistence and effects of Per- and Polyfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS) in the environment. This white paper summarizes the state-of-the-art analytical methods for monitoring…
Key words
pfas, pfassulfonate, sulfonatepaper, paperwhite, whiteenvironmental, environmentalshimadzu, shimadzuultra, ultrafast, fastwaters, watersacid, acidpfoa, pfoawater, wateretfosaa, etfosaamefosaa, mefosaaastm