Bottom-up proteomic profiling with μPAC HPLC columns

Importance of the Topic

Bottom-up proteomic profiling is a cornerstone technique in biological and biomedical research, enabling comprehensive identification and quantification of proteins in complex mixtures. As large-scale quantitative studies demand greater throughput and robustness, innovations in liquid chromatography (LC) columns—such as micro pillar array (μPAC) designs—address critical limitations of conventional packed bed systems by offering improved separation efficiency, reproducibility, and flexibility across a broad range of flow rates.

Objectives and Study Overview

This study evaluates the performance of Thermo Scientific™ μPAC™ HPLC columns in a capillary-flow bottom-up proteomics workflow. By comparing μPAC columns to standard packed bed capillary-flow LC columns, the study established benchmarks for chromatographic performance, protein and peptide identification rates, and operational robustness across multiple flow rates (2.5–10 μL/min) and gradient lengths (15, 30, 60 min) using a 500 ng HeLa cell tryptic digest.

Methodology and Experimental Design

The evaluation involved triplicate separations on both μPAC and packed bed columns. Key experimental variables included three gradient durations (15, 30, 60 min) at four flow rates (2.5, 5, 7.5, 10 μL/min). Mass spectrometric detection recorded basepeak chromatograms, extracted ion chromatograms of reference PRTC peptides, and overall peptide/protein identifications. Chromatographic metrics such as peak width at half maximum (FWHM), peak capacity (nC), and retention time stability (CV) were determined.

Used Instrumentation

• Thermo Scientific μPAC HPLC column: 50 cm bed length, 28 μm pillar diameter, silicon-etched micro pillar array.
• Packed bed capillary-flow LC column: 150 mm × 0.300 mm, 2 μm porous silica particles.
• Capillary-flow LC system: operated at 1–15 μL/min, maximum 350 bar pressure.
• Mass spectrometer: high-resolution MS/MS for peptide identification.

Main Results and Discussion

μPAC columns achieved peak capacities above 200 in 30–90 min gradients and operated at pressures 2–3× lower than packed bed alternatives. At 2.5 μL/min, relative ion abundances and identification rates peaked, reflecting enhanced ionization efficiency and sharper peaks. Average FWHM values for PRTC peptides ranged 0.10–0.11 min across all flow rates. Peak capacity varied with flow rate and gradient length: higher flow rates (≥5 μL/min) favored short gradients (<20 min), whereas lower flow rates (≤2.5 μL/min) maximized separation for long gradients (>40 min). Retention time CV decreased from 0.73% (packed bed) to 0.26% (μPAC), indicating superior reproducibility. Overall, μPAC columns delivered a 20% increase in protein group identifications and up to 45% increase in peptide IDs compared to packed bed columns under comparable conditions.

Benefits and Practical Applications

• Improved robustness: elimination of frits and particles reduces clogging and voids.
• Enhanced throughput: flexible flow rates and reduced void time increase sample processing speed.
• Greater sensitivity: sharper peak shapes and lower flow rates enhance ionization efficiency.
• Consistent performance: lithographic manufacturing ensures column-to-column reproducibility.

Future Trends and Potential Applications

Advances in microstructured column technologies are poised to drive next-generation proteomics by enabling ultra-high throughput, automated workflows, and even greater depth of coverage. Integration with data-independent acquisition (DIA) and single-cell proteomics platforms may further exploit μPAC advantages. Future developments could extend pillar array concepts to other omics separations and support high-pressure, high-temperature operations for challenging sample matrices.

Conclusion

Thermo Scientific μPAC HPLC columns represent a robust, high-performance solution for capillary-flow bottom-up proteomics, outperforming conventional packed bed columns in separation efficiency, identification rates, and retention time stability across a range of flow rates and gradient lengths. Their unique microfabricated architecture offers significant gains in throughput and sensitivity, positioning μPAC technology as a key enabler for large-scale quantitative proteomic studies.

References

1. Bruderer R. et al. Analysis of 1508 Plasma Samples by Capillary-Flow DIA Profiles Proteomics of Weight Loss and Maintenance. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 18, 1242–1254 (2019).
2. Bian Y. et al. Robust, reproducible and quantitative analysis of thousands of proteomes by micro-flow LC–MS/MS. Nat. Commun. 11, 157 (2020).
3. De Malsche W., Gardeniers H., Desmet G. Experimental Study of Porous Silicon Shell Pillars under Retentive Conditions. Anal. Chem. 80, 5391–5400 (2008).
4. De Malsche W. et al. Realization of 1×10⁶ Theoretical Plates Using Very Long Pillar Array Columns. Anal. Chem. 84, 1214–1219 (2012).
5. Neue U.D. Peak capacity in unidimensional chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1184, 107–130 (2008).