Simplified sulfite determination in foods and beverages using ion chromatography

Significance of the Topic

Sulfites are widely used as preservatives in foods and beverages to inhibit microbial growth, delay browning, and enhance color and antioxidant properties. Despite these benefits, sulfites can cause hypersensitivity and allergic reactions in sensitive individuals. Regulatory agencies worldwide require accurate measurement of total sulfite levels in foodstuffs to ensure compliance with labeling rules when concentrations exceed ten milligrams per kilogram.

Objectives and Study Overview

This white paper reviews simplified ion chromatography methods for determining total sulfite in diverse food and beverage matrices. Two automated Metrohm methods are presented: one using amperometric detection for high sensitivity analysis down to 0.2 mg/kg, and another using conductivity detection suited for routine screening at and above regulatory thresholds. The goal is to provide a robust, efficient workflow that minimizes manual intervention and suits a broad range of sample types.

Methodology and Instrumentation

Sample preparation for both methods begins by stabilizing free and reversibly bound sulfite with an alkaline formaldehyde buffer to prevent oxidation. For amperometric detection, one gram of homogenized sample is mixed with the stabilizer, filtered, and injected directly into a Compact IC Flex system equipped with an amperometric detector, high capacity anion exchange column, and automated electrode cleaning via a patented potential sweep. The conductivity method employs dilution, simple filtration or inline ultrafiltration, and injection into an IC fitted with a Metrosep A Supp column and conductivity detector.

Principal Results and Discussion

The amperometric method achieves quantitative recovery across a wide concentration range, with spike recoveries near 100 percent in mustard, canned garlic, and wine samples, and excellent long term stability of the electrode without manual polishing. The conductivity method reliably separates sulfite from common anions and organic acids in beer and wine, with detection limits sufficient for regulatory screening. Together, these approaches allow reliable sulfite quantification in samples of varying complexity and organic load.

Benefits and Practical Applications

• High sensitivity detection below ten milligrams per kilogram using amperometry
• Streamlined sample stabilization and minimal manual handling
• Automated electrode regeneration for continuous operation
• Cost effective conductivity method for routine compliance checks
• Adaptable to a wide array of food matrices including wines, condiments, fruits, and meat products where permitted

Future Trends and Opportunities

Emerging developments include further integration of sample preparation automation, coupling ion chromatography with mass spectrometry for molecular speciation, and deployment of portable devices for on site testing. Green chemistry approaches may reduce reagent consumption and support sustainability goals in analytical laboratories.

Conclusion

The presented Metrohm ion chromatography methods offer reliable, high throughput solutions for total sulfite determination in foods and beverages. They meet regulatory requirements, deliver precise quantification over varying concentration levels, and reduce downtime through automated cleaning and simplified workflows.

Reference

1. Carocho M Barreiro M Morales P et al Adding molecules to food pros and cons A review on synthetic and natural food additives Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 2014 13 377 399
2. Taylor S Higle N Bush R Sulfites in foods Uses analytical methods residues fate exposure assessment metabolism toxicity and hypersensitivity Advances in Food Research 1986 30 1 76
3. EFSA European Food Safety Authority Scientific Opinion on the re evaluation of sulfur dioxide E 220 sodium sulfite E 221 sodium bisulfite E 222 sodium metabisulfite E 223 potassium metabisulfite E 224 calcium sulfite E 226 calcium bisulfite E 227 and potassium bisulfite E 228 as food additives EFSA Journal 2016 14 4438
4. FAO WHO Codex Alimentarius General Standard for Food Additives GSFA Codex Standard 192 1995 FAO Rome Italy 2019
5. Wedzicha B Chemistry of sulphiting agents in food Food Additives Contaminants 1992 9 449 459
6. Scotter M Castle L Chemical interactions between additives in foodstuffs A review Food Additives Contaminants 2004 21 93 124
7. Wedzicha B Goddard S The state of sulfur dioxide at high concentration and low water activity Food Chemistry 1991 40 119 136
8. Gould G W The use of other chemical preservatives Sulfite and nitrite The microbiological safety and quality of foods Aspen Publishers Inc Gaithersburg MD 2000 pages 200 213
9. Wedzicha B Chemistry of sulphiting agents in food Food Additives Contaminants 1992 9 449 459
10. Wedzicha B Sulphur dioxide in foods chemical interactions Nutrition Bulletin 1984 9 155 164
11. García Alonso B Peña Egido M García Moreno C S sulfonate determination and formation in meat products Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2001 49 423 429
12. Sulfites Evaluation of certain food additives fifty first report of the Joint FAO WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives World Health Organization Geneva Switzerland 1999
13. Regulation EU no 1169 2011 European Union Official Journal of the European Union 2018
14. Ongoing verification of product formulation and labeling targeting the eight most common Big 8 food allergens FSIS Directive 7230 1 Rev 2 USDA FSIS Washington DC 2018
15. A food labelling guide Guidance for industry US Food and Drug Administration Office of Nutrition Labeling and Dietary Supplements College Park MD 2013
16. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products Nutrition and Allergies Scientific Opinion on the evaluation of allergenic foods and food ingredients for labelling purposes EFSA Journal 2014 12 3894
17. Regulation EC no 1333 2008 European Union Official Journal of the European Union 2020
18. Regulation EU no 1129 2011 European Union Official Journal of the European Union 2013
19. Regulation EC no 853 2004 European Union Official Journal of the European Union 2021
20. D’Amore T Di Taranto A Berardi G et al Sulfites in meat occurrence activity toxicity regulation and detection A comprehensive review Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 2020 19 2701 2720
21. Monier Williams The determination of sulphur dioxide in foods Analyst 1927 52 343 344
22. Lin J Zhu Y Cheng W et al Determination of Free and Total Sulfite in Red Globe Grape by Ion Chromatography Food Science and Technology Research 2014 20 1079 1085
23. Liao B Sram J Files D Determination of Free Sulfites in Dried Fruits Processed with Sulfur Dioxide by Ion Chromatography through Anion Exchange Column and Conductivity Detection Journal of AOAC International 2013 96 1103 1108
24. AOAC Official Method 990.31 Sulfites in Foods and Beverages Ion Exclusion Chromatographic Method AOAC International Rockville MD 1995
25. Chen L De Borba B Rohrer J Determination of Total Sulfite in Foods and Beverages Application Note Thermo Fisher Scientific Sunnyvale CA 2016
26. Naigeon E Rastetter M Klemm M et al Fast and Accurate Automated Method for Free Sulfite Analysis in Wine Application Note Thermo Fisher Scientific Sunnyvale CA 2014
27. Lanciki A Espinosa MA A Simplified Method to Determine Total Sulphite Content in Food and Beverages via Ion Chromatography The Column 2020 16 12 16
28. Kim H Conca R Richardson M Determination of sulfur dioxide in grapes Comparison of the Monier Williams method and two ion exclusion chromatographic methods Journal of Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990 73 983 989
29. Kim H Chu V Conca R et al Determination of sulfite in foods and beverages by Ion Exclusion Chromatography with Electrochemical Detection collaborative study Journal of Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990 73 216 222