Selecting the best Q Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer scan mode for your application

Significance of the Topic

The choice of scan mode in hybrid quadrupole–Orbitrap mass spectrometers critically influences the balance of sensitivity, selectivity, and acquisition speed in both targeted and untargeted analyses. As high-resolution accurate-mass (HRAM) instruments gain traction across proteomics, small-molecule screening, environmental testing, and quality control, understanding the capabilities and trade-offs of each scan function is essential for robust method development.

Objectives and Overview of the Study

This white paper systematically reviews the data acquisition modes available on Thermo Scientific Q Exactive series instruments. It compares trapping (Orbitrap) and scanning (triple quadrupole) technologies, explains the physical and logical operation of each scan type, and provides practical guidance for method transfer and optimization, taking into account resolution, scan speed, sensitivity, and selectivity.

Methodology

The paper describes the operating principles of eight key scan modes: full MS, full MS with all-ion fragmentation (AIF), targeted selected ion monitoring (t-SIM), parallel reaction monitoring (PRM), data-dependent MS/MS (Top N), targeted SIM with data-dependent MS/MS, neutral-loss triggering, and data-independent acquisition (DIA). It explains how loop counts and multiplexing (MSX) strategies combine multiple precursor fills to maximize duty cycle without compromising spectral quality. Practical considerations such as the need for five to ten data points across chromatographic peaks and pre-scan automatic gain control are also detailed.

Used Instrumentation

Q Exactive series instruments integrate:

• A resolving quadrupole for wide (10–100 Da) or narrow (0.4–2 Da) isolation
• A C-Trap ion storage device controlled by AGC
• An HCD collision cell for fragmentation and multiplexed injection
• A high-field Orbitrap analyzer providing up to 280,000 FWHM resolution at m/z 200

Advanced models (Plus, HF, HF-X) feature segmented quadrupoles for sharper isolation and scan speeds up to 40 Hz.

Main Results and Discussion

Full MS mode offers comprehensive MS1 data and serves as a starting point for most assays. The AIF variant adds global fragmentation but retains full-scan quantitation. t-SIM enhances sensitivity via narrow-range isolation and extended ion injection times. PRM achieves exceptional selectivity and sensitivity by coupling precursor filtering with high-resolution MS2. Top N dd-MS2 methods prioritize the most abundant ions for discovery workflows. DIA systematically fragments sequential m/z windows for broad MS2 coverage. Multiplexing (MSX) further boosts throughput by co-injecting multiple fills into a single Orbitrap scan. Table 1 in the original text summarizes which modes each Q Exactive model supports and their maximum Top N parameters.

Benefits and Practical Applications

These scan modes enable direct transfer of triple quadrupole and Q-TOF methods to an Orbitrap platform, often with improved dynamic range and resolution. Full MS is ideal for routine quantitation; t-SIM is chosen when detection limits are critical; PRM is preferred for confirmation in complex matrices. DIA and neutral-loss triggers facilitate comprehensive screening and structural elucidation in both applied and research settings.

Future Trends and Applications

Advancements in real-time data processing and intelligent acquisition will further harness multiplexing and DIA strategies. Coupling Orbitrap analyzers with novel fragmentation methods, machine-learning-driven precursor selection, and enhanced AGC algorithms promises greater throughput and deeper coverage for proteomics, metabolomics, and trace-level contaminant analysis.

Conclusion

The Q Exactive series offers a versatile toolbox of scan modes that address diverse analytical challenges. By starting with full MS and selectively adding SIM, PRM, or DIA as needed, analysts can tailor methods to meet sensitivity, selectivity, and speed requirements, fully leveraging high-resolution Orbitrap technology.

Reference

1. Maciej Bromirski. First choice in high resolution mass spectrometry with Orbitrap mass analyzer technology for screening, confirmation and quantitative analyses; Thermo Fisher Scientific White Paper 65146; February 2018.
2. A. Makarov, E. Denisov, A. Kholomeev, W. Balschun, O. Lange, K. Strupat, S. Horning. Performance evaluation of a hybrid linear ion trap/Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Analytical Chemistry 2006, 78, 2113.
3. Hu Q., Noll R.J., Li H., Makarov A., Hardman M., Cooks R.G. The Orbitrap: a new mass spectrometer. Journal of Mass Spectrometry 2005, 40, 430.
4. Perry R.H., Cooks R.G., Noll R.J. Orbitrap mass spectrometry: Instrumentation, ion motion and applications. Mass Spectrometry Reviews 2008, 27, 661.
5. Hu Q., Cooks R.G., Noll R.J. Phase-enhanced selective ion ejection in an Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 2007, 18, 980.
6. Zubarev R., Makarov A. Orbitrap mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 2013, 85, 5288.
7. Strupat K., Scheibner O., Bromirski M. High-Resolution, Accurate-Mass Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry – Definitions, Opportunities, and Advantages; Thermo Fisher Scientific Technical Note 64287; December 2016.
8. Kaufmann A., Butcher P., Maden K., Walker S., Widmer M. Reliability of veterinary drug residue confirmation: High resolution mass spectrometry versus tandem mass spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta 2015, 856, 54.
9. Thermo Fisher Scientific. Orbitrap quantitation: Lab of the future. Application note AI65645.