Getting Off to a Good Start - The makings of a reliable method

Significance of the Topic

Liquid chromatography method reliability is critical in analytical chemistry to ensure reproducible and accurate results. Numerous studies highlight a reproducibility crisis in published experiments, with only around 40% of findings reliably replicated. Establishing robust LC methods minimizes errors in pharmaceutical quality control, bioanalysis, and environmental monitoring.

Study Objectives and Overview

This work outlines a systematic framework for developing reliable reversed-phase LC methods. Key goals include achieving baseline resolution (Rs ≥ 2), ensuring ruggedness across column lots, labs, and instruments, and documenting method parameters for easy transfer. Practical examples demonstrate these principles using Agilent Poroshell columns and validation kits.

Methodology and Instrumentation

Method development focused on evaluating:

• Column properties: particle size, bonded phase, and lot variability.
• Mobile phase: aqueous buffer composition and concentration, organic modifier type (acetonitrile vs methanol), pH, and gradient profile.
• Temperature and system dwell volume.
• Sample factors: injection volume robustness and solvent strength effects.
• Instrument parameters: extracolumn volume impact on band broadening.

Used instrumentation included an Agilent 1290 Infinity LC with DAD detection at 260 nm; Poroshell 120 EC-C18 columns (2.7 µm, 4.6 × 50 mm) and Method Validation kit; and a dwell volume determination setup using stainless steel tubing and acetone gradient.

Main Results and Discussion

Lot-to-lot testing showed consistent resolution near Rs = 2.0, with minor retention shifts. Adjusting organic content by a few percent improved Rs to >2.5, demonstrating built-in robustness. pH variations of ±0.1–0.2 units had modest effects on selectivity, while buffer strength around 20–25 mM balanced peak shape and column lifetime. Acetonitrile provided stronger elution and wider UV transparency than methanol but required lower pressure. Injection volumes from 1 to 10 µL revealed dispersion effects influencing peak symmetry. Minimizing extracolumn volume preserved efficiency.

Benefits and Practical Applications

Implementing these guidelines streamlines method transfer and reduces troubleshooting. Clear documentation of mobile phase preparation, column selection, and system calibration ensures consistent performance in QC, bioanalysis, and research environments. Method Validation kits expedite lot screening.

Future Trends and Opportunities

Emerging trends include ultrahigh-performance superficially porous particle columns, micro-flow LC for enhanced sensitivity, and AI-driven method design. Automated dwell volume calibration and inline buffer management will further standardize method reliability across platforms.

Conclusion

Developing reliable LC methods requires a comprehensive approach addressing chemical, sample, and instrument variables. Systematic robustness testing and thorough documentation create resilient methods that deliver reproducible results across laboratories.

References

• Baker M and Penny D. Is there a reproducibility crisis? Nature. 2016;533:452–454.
• Dolan JW, Lommen DC, Snyder LR. DryLab simulations of substituted benzoic acid sample. J Chromatogr. 1990;535:55–75.
• Agilent Technologies. Effect of Mobile Phase Preparation on Chromatography. Pub. No. 5988-6476EN.