Comparing Mobile Phase Additives for the Separation of mAb Tryptic Peptides: A Case Study on Formic, Difluoroacetic, and Trifluoroacetic Acid

Significance of the Topic

Peptide mapping by reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (RP LC-MS) is essential for characterizing biopharmaceutical proteins. Selecting the right mobile phase additive balances chromatographic resolution and MS sensitivity, directly affecting data quality in protein primary structure analysis and critical quality attribute monitoring.

Study Objectives and Overview

This work compares three common ion-pairing acids—formic acid (FA), difluoroacetic acid (DFA), and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)—for the separation of a reduced and alkylated tryptic digest of NIST mAb reference material. The goals are to evaluate chromatographic selectivity, peak capacity, mass spectrometric sensitivity, charge state distributions, and adduct formation for each additive.

Methodology and Instrumentation

Samples consisted of a commercial NIST mAb tryptic digest reconstituted in aqueous FA. Separations were performed on two UPLC columns: Peptide BEH C18 and Peptide CSH C18 (2.1 × 150 mm, 1.7 µm). Mobile phases A and B contained 0.1% FA, DFA, or TFA in water or acetonitrile, respectively, run over an optimized gradient at 80 °C. UV detection wavelengths were adjusted by additive (210 nm for FA, 214 nm for TFA, 219 nm for DFA). MS analyses employed a Xevo G2-XS QToF system with MassLynx and UNIFI software. IonHance DFA was used to minimize sodium and potassium adducts.

Main Results and Discussion

• Retention and Selectivity: Peptide retention increased in the order FA < DFA < TFA, reflecting rising ion-pair strength and hydrophobicity. DFA provided intermediate selectivity, enabling resolution of critical species not fully separated by FA or TFA.
• Peak Capacity: TFA yielded the highest effective peak capacity, FA the lowest, and DFA approached TFA values. CSH columns generally delivered slightly higher peak capacities than BEH columns.
• MS Sensitivity and Charge States: FA produced the highest total ion signal, TFA the lowest, with DFA between the two. Charge state distributions with DFA resembled those of FA for most peptides, though weighted averages sometimes shifted toward TFA values.
• Adduct Formation: Commercial-grade DFA introduced significant sodium adducts (~20%), whereas MS-grade IonHance DFA limited adducts to negligible levels, matching the low-adduct performance of FA.

Benefits and Practical Applications

DFA offers a balanced compromise: chromatographic resolution close to TFA and MS sensitivity near FA. Its unique selectivity can enhance peptide map clarity, and its low metal impurity specification preserves spectrum clean- ness. This makes DFA especially useful for difficult separations, comparability studies, and high-throughput QC workflows.

Future Trends and Possibilities

• Ion-Pairing Innovation: Exploration of alternative fluoroacetic acids or mixed modifiers to further tune selectivity and sensitivity.
• High-Throughput Mapping: Integration of DFA-based methods in automated platforms for rapid biotherapeutic characterization.
• Expanded Applications: Applying DFA chemistry to intact protein, subunit, and post-translational modification analyses.

Conclusion

This case study demonstrates that difluoroacetic acid, when purified to MS grade, provides a versatile mobile phase additive combining high chromatographic peak capacity with strong MS signal and minimal adduct formation. DFA thus represents a valuable tool for enhanced peptide mapping of monoclonal antibodies.

References

1. Monroe M.E. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2002.
2. Wagner B.M. et al. LCGC North America 2015, 33, 856–865.
3. Nguyen J.M. et al. mAbs 2019, 11(7), 1–9.
4. De Cecco M. et al. Waters Tech. Brief 2019.
5. Kellett J. et al. Waters Tech. Brief 2018.
6. Nguyen J.M. et al. Waters App. Note 2019.
7. Lauber M.A. et al. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 6936–6944.
8. Koza S.M. et al. Waters App. Note 2017.