Implementing Comet search engine into Proteome Discoverer to improve TMT Real-Time Search data processing

Importance of the Topic

The integration of real-time database searching with post-acquisition analysis is critical for high-plex quantitative proteomics workflows. Tandem Mass Tag (TMT) labeling coupled with SPS-MS3 acquisition on modern instruments boosts identification depth and quantification precision. Achieving optimal alignment between online real-time search (RTS) results and subsequent data analysis enhances confidence in peptide–spectrum matches and streamlines large-scale studies.

Objectives and Study Overview

This study evaluated the performance of the Comet search engine implemented in Proteome Discoverer (PD) 3.0 versus the established Sequest HT engine. Using TMT11plex and prototype TMTpro18plex yeast digest standards, multiple PSM validation strategies (Fixed Value, Target Decoy, Percolator) were compared to determine the best approach for maximizing identifications, controlling false discovery rate (FDR), and aligning post-acquisition results with RTS outputs.

Methodology and Instrumentation

• Sample Preparation: TMT11plex Yeast Digest Standard and prototype TMTpro18plex yeast digest reconstituted at 250 ng/µL in 0.1% TFA/5% ACN.
• Chromatography: EASY-nLC 1200 system with 50 cm EASY-Spray column; 50 min and 120 min LC gradients.
• Mass Spectrometry: Thermo Scientific Orbitrap Eclipse Tribrid MS (ICSW 3.5).
• Real-Time Search: Comet algorithm (2019.01 rev.1) with thresholds Xcorr ≥ 1.4, ΔCn ≥ 0.1, mass tolerance 10 ppm.
• Post-Acquisition Analysis: Proteome Discoverer 3.0 using Comet and Sequest HT engines.
• PSM Validation: Fixed Value PSM Validator (score threshold), Target Decoy PSM Validator (1% FDR), and Percolator node (posterior error probabilities).

Main Results and Discussion

• The Comet Fixed Value PSM Validator yielded the highest number of identified and quantified protein groups and peptides, with superior alignment to RTS Xcorr distributions.
• Target Decoy and Percolator provided stringent FDR control but at a modest cost to total identifications.
• Combining Comet and Sequest HT search engines in parallel PD workflows increased protein group identifications by 5–12% and quantification IDs by 5–10% relative to individual engines.
• Evaluation of the TMTpro18plex prototype standard demonstrated accurate quantification across channels; Sequest HT coupled with Percolator achieved the closest alignment to expected ratios.

Benefits and Practical Applications

• Improved concordance between real-time acquisition data and post-processing results enhances reliability in high-throughput quantitative proteomics.
• Flexible PSM validation approaches allow laboratories to prioritize either maximal proteome coverage or strict FDR control based on experimental goals.
• Parallel use of complementary search engines offers a straightforward strategy to deepen proteome coverage and improve quantification robustness.

Future Trends and Potential Applications

• Advancement of integrated real-time search algorithms may further optimize instrument duty cycles and data completeness.
• Broader adoption of multi-engine workflows will likely drive deeper proteome analysis in complex samples.
• Expansion to higher-plex labeling reagents and novel standard samples will support method benchmarking and quality control.
• Applications in clinical proteomics, single-cell analyses, and regulated QA/QC environments will benefit from enhanced search and validation strategies.

Conclusion

The implementation of Comet within Proteome Discoverer 3.0, coupled with an appropriate PSM validation strategy, significantly improves alignment with real-time search outputs, increases identification and quantification depth, and offers flexible control over FDR. Combining complementary search engines further enhances proteome coverage, making this approach valuable for diverse quantitative proteomics applications.