<h4>2nd Annual International NETPHARM Conference: From Cutting-Edge Equipment to Excellent Results at the Midpoint of the Project</h4>On 15–16 April 2026, the second annual international conference of the project “New Technologies for Translational Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences” (NETPHARM) took place in Kudowa-Zdrój, Poland. The meeting, attended by more than 100 researchers, confirmed that after two years of implementation the project is successfully fulfilling its ambitious goals in linking basic research with clinical practice.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Mgr_Martina_Kopecka_Jurcekova_Prof_Petr_Pavek_8db8f7e5f2.jpg" alt="Mgr. Martina Kopecká Jurčeková: Prof. Petr Pávek" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Mgr_Martina_Kopecka_Jurcekova_Prof_Petr_Pavek_8db8f7e5f2.jpg 234w," sizes="100vw" width="1200" height="800"><h4>Scientific excellence and international outreach</h4>The scientific programme of the conference focused on progress in five key research objectives (RO1–RO5), with the leaders of individual sections presenting achieved milestones, scientific results, and team synergies over the past year. Prof. Kateřina Vávrová presented on pharmaceutical and analytical chemistry (RO1), while progress in pharmacology and toxicology (RO2) was summarized by Prof. František Štaud. Prof. Martin Hrubý presented results in the field of novel drug delivery systems and formulations (RO3), and Assoc. Prof. Daniela Fialová (RO4) introduced research in geriatric clinical pharmacy focused on systematic literature reviews, algorithms for individualized pharmacotherapy, and pilot deprescribing interventions. Evaluation of activities in advanced in vitro and in silico approaches in drug development (RO5) was presented by Assoc. Prof. Tomáš Smutný. Among the keynote speakers were, for example, Prof. Martin Hrubý with a lecture on stimuli-responsive polymers for biomedical applications, and Prof. František Švec, who addressed the use of monoliths in supercritical fluid chromatography for the separation of large biologically active molecules.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Mgr_Martina_Kopecka_Jurcekova_2_vyrocni_mezinarodni_konference_NETPHARM_prof_Frantisek_Svec_0b7cb8a321.jpg" alt="Mgr. Martina Kopecká Jurčeková: Prof. František Švec" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Mgr_Martina_Kopecka_Jurcekova_2_vyrocni_mezinarodni_konference_NETPHARM_prof_Frantisek_Svec_0b7cb8a321.jpg 234w," sizes="100vw" width="1200" height="800">A key contribution was the participation of members of the International Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB), led by Prof. Maria da Conceição from the University of Porto. As part of invited lectures, these distinguished experts presented the latest global trends: Prof. Kevin A. Schug (<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/companies/301">University of Texas at Arlington</a>) focused on the characterization of advanced drug formulations, Prof. Igor Lacík (Slovak Academy of Sciences) discussed the use of polymers in diabetes treatment, Prof. Søren Bak (University of Copenhagen) presented plant natural products as next-generation biopesticides, and Prof. Michael Lämmerhofer (University of Tübingen) analyzed the importance of metabolomics and lipidomics in biomedical research.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Mgr_Martina_Kopecka_Jurcekova_prof_Kevin_A_Schug_b31db2c431.jpg" alt="Mgr. Martina Kopecká Jurčeková: Prof. Kevin A. Schug" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Mgr_Martina_Kopecka_Jurcekova_prof_Kevin_A_Schug_b31db2c431.jpg 234w," sizes="100vw" width="1200" height="800"><h4>Key results: 110 publications and investment in infrastructure</h4>The NETPHARM project, funded by the Jan Amos Komenský Operational Programme (OP JAK), achieved significant milestones by early 2026:<ul><li>Interdisciplinary expert team: More than 200 researchers, both experienced and early-career scientists, have been involved in research activities within the project.</li><li>Publications: 110 scientific publications have been produced, the majority of which fall into the Q1 category.</li><li>Dissemination and outreach: The number of contributions at international conferences (195) already exceeds the original plan by 38%.</li><li>Infrastructure: 16 state-of-the-art instruments have been acquired for research laboratories, with a total value of CZK 37.5 million, including an X-ray diffractometer, confocal microscopy, and a computational server.</li><li>Audit: An on-site inspection by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports was successfully completed, confirming the efficient use of grant funds.</li></ul><h4>Strategic recommendations for the future</h4>The conference was followed on 17 April by the 3rd meeting of the ISAB, held in the historic premises of the Carolinum in Prague. The ISAB appreciated the dynamic collaboration among institutions such as Charles University (Faculty of Pharmacy and Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové), the <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/companies/11">University of Chemistry and Technology in Prague</a>, institutes of the <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/companies/10">Czech Academy of Sciences</a> (<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/companies/62">IOCB Prague</a> and IMC), and <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/companies/12">Masaryk University</a>/<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/companies/36">CEITEC</a>. For the remaining half of the project, experts recommended an even stronger focus on international mobility of project teams, strengthening synergies among individual teams, accelerating the patent application process, and focusing on the soft skills of junior researchers.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Mgr_Martina_Kopecka_Jurcekova_3_zasedani_rady_ISAB_0121b9b78d.jpg" alt="Mgr. Martina Kopecká Jurčeková: 3rd meeting of the ISAB" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Mgr_Martina_Kopecka_Jurcekova_3_zasedani_rady_ISAB_0121b9b78d.jpg 208w," sizes="100vw" width="1200" height="900"><h4>Networking and support for talent</h4>In addition to the intensive scientific programme, there was also a social programme, including a tour of Kudowa-Zdrój and a joint dinner. An important part was the award for the best poster presentations by young scientists, highlighting the project’s emphasis on educating a new generation of pharmaceutical experts. Among the awardees were Ing. Anna Tvrdá, Mgr. Mária Bajnoková, and Mary Angelia Alfred, M.Sc.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Mgr_Martina_Kopecka_Jurcekova_oceneni_nejlepsich_posterovych_prezentaci_37ba838bed.jpg" alt="Mgr. Martina Kopecká Jurčeková: Award for the best poster presentations" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Mgr_Martina_Kopecka_Jurcekova_oceneni_nejlepsich_posterovych_prezentaci_37ba838bed.jpg 234w," sizes="100vw" width="1200" height="800"><blockquote>“NETPHARM is at the midpoint of its journey and clearly demonstrates that building a nationwide platform of excellence makes sense. Our scientific outputs and modernized facilities form a strong foundation for innovations that will directly influence the quality of pharmaceutical care in the future,” said Prof. Petr Pávek, the project’s principal investigator, summarising the meeting.</blockquote>

2nd Annual International NETPHARM Conference

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) remains one of the most widely used analytical techniques for separating, identifying, and quantifying compounds in complex mixtures. Successful HPLC method development depends not only on selecting the correct column and optimizing the mobile phase composition, but also on choosing the appropriate detector. Even a perfectly optimized chromatographic separation provides little value if the detection system cannot properly capture and interpret the analytes of interest.In many ways, the detector acts as the “vision system” of the chromatograph. It converts separated compounds into measurable electronic signals, allowing analysts to identify components and determine their concentrations. The choice of detector therefore has a major impact on sensitivity, selectivity, robustness, and the overall quality of analytical data.This article provides an overview of the most common HPLC detection techniques, discusses their strengths and limitations, and outlines the most important criteria to consider when selecting a detector for a specific analytical task.<h3>HPLC Detection Technologies</h3>HPLC detectors are typically divided into two major categories:<ol><li>Specific detectors (solute-property detectors)</li><li>Bulk property detectors</li></ol>Specific detectors respond to a particular chemical or physical property of the analyte. Ideally, their signal is largely unaffected by changes in mobile phase composition. Common examples include UV/Vis detectors, fluorescence detectors, and mass spectrometers.Bulk property detectors, on the other hand, measure differences between the pure mobile phase and the mobile phase containing analytes. These detectors are considered more universal because they respond to properties shared by many compounds. Refractive index detectors are among the best-known examples, alongside conductivity and light-scattering detectors.Both detector categories have important advantages depending on the application, sample type, and analytical goals.<h3>Common Detector Types Used in HPLC</h3>A wide variety of detectors are available for HPLC systems, ranging from highly universal devices to extremely selective and sensitive technologies.Common detector options include:<ul><li>UV/Vis detectors</li><li>Diode array detectors (DAD/PDA)</li><li>Fluorescence detectors</li><li>Refractive index detectors (RID)</li><li>Conductivity detectors</li><li>Evaporative light scattering detectors (ELSD)</li><li>Charged aerosol detectors (CAD)</li><li>Mass spectrometry detectors (MS)</li></ul>Each technology offers a different balance of sensitivity, selectivity, robustness, operational complexity, and cost.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/KNAUER_Detector_overview_with_characteristics_Graphic_by_KNAUER_84b0dd30b1.jpg" alt="KNAUER: Detector overview with characteristics. Graphic by KNAUER." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_KNAUER_Detector_overview_with_characteristics_Graphic_by_KNAUER_84b0dd30b1.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1293" height="596"><h3>Selecting the Right HPLC Detector</h3>There is no universally ideal detector for all HPLC applications. The best choice depends on several factors, including analyte chemistry, matrix complexity, required detection limits, and instrument compatibility.Careful detector selection is essential for obtaining reliable and meaningful analytical results.The following considerations can help guide the selection process.<h4>1. Chemical and Physical Properties of the Analytes</h4>The chemical nature of the compounds being analyzed is one of the most important selection criteria.Questions to consider include:<ul><li>Do the analytes contain chromophores?</li><li>Are the compounds naturally fluorescent?</li><li>What is their polarity?</li><li>What is their molecular weight?</li><li>Are they volatile or non-volatile?</li></ul>Compounds containing UV-active groups are often well suited for UV/Vis detection, while fluorescent molecules can benefit from the high sensitivity of fluorescence detectors. Non-UV-active compounds may require universal detection approaches such as CAD, ELSD, or mass spectrometry.<h4>2. Required Sensitivity</h4>Detector sensitivity determines the minimum concentration that can be reliably detected and quantified.Routine quality control analyses often rely on UV/Vis detectors because they provide sufficient sensitivity for many applications while remaining relatively simple and cost-effective. However, trace-level analysis or highly complex matrices may require more advanced technologies such as:<ul><li>Fluorescence detection</li><li>Charged aerosol detection</li><li>Mass spectrometry</li></ul>These techniques offer significantly lower detection limits and greater analytical specificity.<h4>3. Detector Linearity</h4>Linearity describes how well detector response correlates with analyte concentration across a defined range.A detector with strong linearity ensures accurate quantification and simplifies calibration procedures. Poor linearity can introduce quantification errors, especially when analyzing samples across broad concentration ranges.<h4>4. Dynamic Range</h4>Dynamic range refers to the concentration interval over which the detector can reliably measure analytes.Applications involving samples with highly variable concentrations require detectors capable of maintaining accurate response over a broad range. A wide dynamic range reduces the need for repeated dilutions or multiple analytical runs.<h4>5. Selectivity</h4>Selectivity defines the detector’s ability to distinguish target analytes from other matrix components.This factor becomes particularly important for complex samples containing many interfering substances. Highly selective detectors reduce the risk of overlapping signals and false positives.Mass spectrometry is often advantageous when dealing with unknown compounds or highly complicated sample matrices because it provides structural information in addition to quantitative data.<h4>6. Budget Considerations</h4>Detector cost is another practical factor that laboratories must evaluate.UV/Vis and refractive index detectors are generally among the more economical choices, making them attractive for routine analyses and standard applications.More sophisticated technologies such as fluorescence detection, CAD, or mass spectrometry typically require:<ul><li>Higher initial investment</li><li>Additional maintenance</li><li>More complex infrastructure</li><li>Greater operational expertise</li></ul>However, the overall value of the detector should always be considered in relation to analytical performance requirements and long-term application needs.<h4>7. Instrument and Mobile Phase Compatibility</h4>The selected detector must be compatible with the operational conditions of the HPLC system.Important parameters include:<ul><li>Flow rate range</li><li>Pressure limitations</li><li>Mobile phase composition</li><li>Solvent compatibility</li></ul>Some detectors are highly sensitive to mobile phase composition or gradient changes, while others tolerate a broader range of operating conditions.Ensuring proper compatibility helps prevent baseline instability, signal interference, and reduced detector performance.<h4>8. Destructive vs. Non-Destructive Detection</h4>Another important consideration is whether the analytical workflow involves only detection or also preparative purification.Non-destructive detectors allow collected fractions to remain intact after detection, which is highly beneficial for preparative chromatography and purification workflows.Destructive detectors, by contrast, consume or alter the sample during measurement and are therefore more suitable for analytical applications where sample recovery is not required.<h4>9. Reliability and Ease of Operation</h4>Practical usability is often just as important as analytical performance.Some detectors are designed for straightforward plug-and-play operation, while others require:<ul><li>Frequent calibration</li><li>Specialized maintenance</li><li>Dedicated gas supplies</li><li>Vacuum systems</li><li>Advanced operator expertise</li></ul>Laboratories should evaluate the available technical support, user experience, and maintenance capabilities before implementing more sophisticated detection technologies.Reliable operation and manageable maintenance requirements can significantly improve laboratory productivity and reduce downtime.Choosing the correct HPLC detector starts with understanding both the sample and the analytical objective. Rather than selecting a detector simply because it is available, laboratories should ensure that the technology aligns with the chemistry of the analytes, required performance characteristics, and workflow demands.In many cases, combining multiple detectors within a single HPLC system can provide even greater analytical insight by delivering complementary information from the same chromatographic separation.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/KNAUER_Flow_scheme_for_detector_selection_Graphic_by_KNAUER_486004045f.jpg" alt="KNAUER: Flow scheme for detector selection. Graphic by KNAUER." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_KNAUER_Flow_scheme_for_detector_selection_Graphic_by_KNAUER_486004045f.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1316" height="808">Interested in learning more? Future articles will explore individual HPLC detection techniques in greater detail, including their operating principles, application areas, and practical advantages for different analytical workflows.

A comprehensive guide for selecting the appropriate HPLC detector

News from LabRulezLCMS Library - Week 20, 2026

Article

Product

Application

Academy

Science and research

The Faculty of Pharmacy, with its seat in the town of Hradec Králové, was established by a government decree in 1969. This Faculty of Pharmacy has continued in the old and long-time tradition of the education of pharmacy at Charles University.

Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University

Everything from the world of analytical chemistry in one place. We connect people in solving their problems. At Labrulez you will find all the necessary information easily, quickly and clearly. Stop searching and start finding.

LabRulez

Based in Berlin, KNAUER is a medium-sized, owner-managed company that has been serving the sciences since 1962. We develop and manufacture scientific instruments of superior quality for liquid chromatography, including: Analytical HPLC/UHPLC, Preparative HPLC, Fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC), Multi-column chromatography/Simulated moving bed (SMB) chromatography. High pressure dosing, in-line detection systems, and osmometry are additional business areas.

KNAUER

Agilent Technologies

Phenomenex

Thermo Fisher Scientific

Business Review Webinars

Reversed phase is the most common mode of HPLC but if it’s not working for you, don’t despair, there are other options. Perhaps HILIC, Chiral, IEX, GPC/SEC, Affinity, SFC, or HIC might be better suited to your sample type.
In this seminar, we will look at additional chromatographic techniques and discuss:
<ul>
<li>Mechanism of separation
</li>
<li>Column selection and available chemistries
</li>
<li>Typical method and eluent conditions
</li>
</ul>
Becoming familiar with other modes of chromatography and investigating alternative chemistry options can result in an improved separation or provide additional information for your sample.
<blockquote>
Presenter: Jean Lane (Application Engineer, Agilent Technologies, Inc.)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Jean has been employed with Agilent since Nov 2010 in technical and applications support and has a primary role supporting Agilent’s full line of LC columns and consumables, which also includes support for Agilent’s GPC/SEC product line. She came to Agilent thru acquisition of Varian and the former Polymer Laboratories. Jean has 20 plus years of technical and applications support for both HPLC and GPC consumable products. In addition to practical chromatography experience in the laboratory, she has had many, many years in her technical role involving customer support providing assistance and troubleshooting for customer chromatography issues.
</blockquote>

Agilent Technologies: There is More to HPLC Than Reversed Phase; Exploring Other Options

There is More to HPLC Than Reversed Phase; Exploring Other Options

There is More to HPLC: Exploring Other Options

Improper LC connections can create bad chromatography.
In this presentation we will discuss:
<ul>
<li>Types of fittings – what is the best option?
</li>
<li>The importance of using the correct capillary
</li>
<li>How improper connections can affect the chromatogram
</li>
<li>How to make a good connection
</li>
</ul>
Something as simple as a connection can potentially cause chromatography problems that may take you a long time to troubleshoot. Careful attention to making a good connection can reduce frustration and save time troubleshooting.
<blockquote>
Presenter: Golnar Javadi (Application Engineer, Agilent Technologies, Inc.)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Golnar Javadi is an applications engineer providing online applications assistance and technical support for LC columns and supplies, Sample Preparation products, and Spectroscopy supplies.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Before joining Varian and then Agilent, Golnar worked in the pharmaceutical and nutraceutical industries on method development and quality control. She also taught college level chemistry courses for a few years.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Golnar then joined Varian as a technical support specialist, providing customers with method development assistance and technical support on Sample Preparation (SPE, SLE, and Filtration), HPLC, GC, ToxiLab and DAT. After the Varian-Agilent merger, Golnar joined Agilent Technologies as an Applications Engineer. She provides technical support to customers on Sample Preparation products, Liquid Chromatography columns, and Spectroscopy supplies.
</blockquote>

Agilent Technologies: All About LC Connections – The Importance of Making a Great One

All About LC Connections – The Importance of Making a Great One

Improper LC connections can create bad chromatography.

LC Connections – The Importance of Making a Great One

Porous particle sizes have decreased to sub-two micron (STM). Separations formerly done on 5 micron particles can now be accomplished on much shorter STM columns in a fraction of the time with equal or better resolution.
For more complex separations, longer columns can generate high plate counts but at much higher pressure. Recently, an alternative particle design, the superficially porous particle (SPP), has developed. The particle concept has been around for over 40 years but the current version consists of a small solid core (e.g., 1.7-µm in diameter) surrounded by a thin porous shell (e.g., 0.5-µm thick) making a 2.7-µm particle diameter.
The efficiency of these SPPs is similar to the STM because of:
<ul>
<li>Consistent spherical shape
</li>
<li>Rapid solute mass transfer
</li>
<li>Narrow particle size distribution
</li>
</ul>
The larger particle size results in a much lower pressure drop when compared to STM particles, making them compatible with older 400 bar instruments as well as UHPLC systems.
This seminar will look at both types of particles and discuss when you might choose one over the other. Examples of pertinent applications will be cited.
<blockquote>
Presenter: Rita Steed (Application Engineer, Agilent Technologies, Inc.)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Rita Steed began supporting the LC column line for Agilent in 1999. As a Chromatography Specialist (first with Chromatography, Inc., then directly for Agilent), Rita worked on-site with researchers in Pharmaceutical and other industries presenting technical seminars and assisting researchers with troubleshooting and method development. Rita has over 20 years of Chromatography experience in the Biotechnology, Chemical, and Pharmaceutical industries. She has held positions in Research, Sales, and Technical Service. Rita has earned degrees in Microbiology and Life Sciences/Biochemistry. In her current position, she is an inside Application Engineer supporting LC columns.
</blockquote>

Agilent Technologies: Practical Aspects of High Performance Column Selection in LC: Superficially Porous (SPP) or Sub-two Micron (STM)

Practical Aspects of High Performance Column Selection in LC: Superficially Porous (SPP) or Sub-two Micron (STM)

Both types of particles and discuss when you might choose one over the other.

Superficially Porous (SPP) or Sub-two Micron (STM)

Superficially porous particles offer improved efficiency and performance over similarly sized traditional totally porous particles.
Higher efficiency leads to improved resolution and possible time savings with superficially porous particles, hence their popularity for HPLC analyses. Columns using superficially porous particles are available in a wide variety of particle sizes and stationary phase chemistries. This webinar will go into detail on how a chromatographer can exploit new phase chemistries on superficially porous columns, as well as utilize new chemistries optimized for long life at elevated pH for improved resolution.
What you will learn:
<ul>
<li>How to use the many phase chemistry options available for superficially porous columns as a powerful tool to expedite method development
</li>
<li>How to use pH to manipulate selectivity of ionizable compounds
</li>
<li>Which superficially porous particle column is best for your current laboratory setup
</li>
</ul>
Who should attend:
<ul>
<li>Chromatographers looking to improve their LC method development by taking advantage of selectivity, via new phase chemistries and pH, on superficially porous columns for maximizing resolution and improving results.</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Anne Mack (Applications Scientist, Agilent Technologies, Inc.)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Anne is an application scientist at Agilent Technologies, specializing in small molecule LC columns, ranging from HPLC to UHPLC. Anne has worked at Agilent for almost 10 years. She started as a Field Service Engineer repairing both liquid and gas phase instruments. Since she joined the applications team in 2008, she has supported new LC products in R&amp;D as well as the entirety of the existing small molecule LC column portfolio in Marketing
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Stephen Luke (LC Columns Product Manager, Agilent Technologies, Inc.)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Steve became LC Columns Product Manager for Agilent Technologies in January 2014. His long experience with liquid chromatography began during the mid-1980s in the analytical development laboratory of a large pharmaceutical company and has held roles in multiple different functions, including technical support, R&amp;D, and marketing, for leading organizations in the separations science industry.
</blockquote>

Agilent technologies: Maximizing Resolution and Selectivity: Superficially Porous Column Chromatography Options

Maximizing Resolution and Selectivity: Superficially Porous Column Chromatography Options

How a chromatographer can exploit new phase chemistries on superficially porous columns.

Superficially Porous Column Chromatography Options

There are many choices for reversed phase columns.
In this seminar we will look at: The basics of column chemistry including o Silica surface - Chemistry &amp; Physical Properties Bonding Chemistries End-capping Particle size options Totally porous vs. superficially porous columns We will also look at how this fits with our conditions to get good lifetime from our columns.
<blockquote>
Presenter: Rita Steed (Application Engineer, Agilent Technologies, Inc.)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Rita Steed began supporting the LC column line for Agilent in 1999. As a Chromatography Specialist (first with Chromatography, Inc., then directly for Agilent), Rita worked on-site with researchers in Pharmaceutical and other industries presenting technical seminars and assisting researchers with troubleshooting and method development. Rita has over 20 years of Chromatography experience in the Biotechnology, Chemical, and Pharmaceutical industries. She has held positions in Research, Sales, and Technical Service. Rita has earned degrees in Microbiology and Life Sciences/Biochemistry. In her current position, she is an inside Application Engineer supporting LC columns.
</blockquote>

Agilent Technologies: A Look at Column Choices

A Look at Column Choices

 The basics of column chemistry including o Silica surface.

Problems with improper connections are often mistaken for column issues and are a source of many calls to tech support.
In this presentation we’ll discuss:
<ul>
<li>The different types of fittings, including Agilent’s new A-line fittings
</li>
<li>The importance of tubing
</li>
<li>What happens when you don’t make a good connection
</li>
<li>How to make a proper connection
</li>
</ul>
The function of a fitting is simple but a connection made incorrectly can cause problems with your chromatography. Careful attention to making a good one can reduce frustration and save time troubleshooting.
<blockquote>
Presenter: Mark Powell (Application Engineer, Agilent Technologies, Inc.)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Mark Powell is an Applications Engineer located at Agilent’s Little Falls site in Wilmington, DE. Before joining Agilent in 2011, Mark worked in the pharmaceutical industry synthesizing, purifying and analyzing drug candidates. He provides applications assistance and technical support for Agilent’s HPLC columns and consumables.
</blockquote>

Agilent Technologies: Making LC Connections - The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly

Making LC Connections - The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly

Problems with improper connections are often mistaken for column issues and are a source of many calls to tech support.

C18 is the most common column for HPLC but what if it doesn’t work for your sample. Very polar compounds have poor retention in reversed phase and can be challenging to separate.
In this talk, we will discuss changes to your reversed phase conditions that can help. We’ll also look at the benefits of choosing a more polar stationary phase. If reversed phase doesn’t work you may need to explore other types of chromatography, like HILIC or Ion Pair Chromatography.
<blockquote>
Presenter: Mark Powell (Application Engineer, Agilent Technologies, Inc.)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Mark Powell is an Applications Engineer located at Agilent’s Little Falls site in Wilmington, DE. Before joining Agilent in 2011, Mark worked in the pharmaceutical industry synthesizing, purifying and analyzing drug candidates. He provides applications assistance and technical support for Agilent’s HPLC columns and consumables.
</blockquote>

Agilent Technologies: Polar Analytes C18 Didn’t Work, Now What

Polar Analytes C18 Didn’t Work, Now What

Changes to your reversed phase conditions that can help.

As modern mass spectrometers (MS) have become ever increasingly more sensitive the limiting factor of the relative ionization efficacy has remained a constraint. 
The limit to any mass spectrometer’s sensitivity is the amount of sample that gets ionized and subsequently introduced into the MS. The sensitivity challenge can be great, especially in situations where your analytes of interest are hard to ionize, or you are limited in the amount of physical sample you have to work with. 
To overcome these challenges scientists are turning to miniaturized separation scale columns either micro scale or nano scale. Miniaturization of HPLC columns, just as with any miniaturization comes with its unique challenges. 
In this talk, we will discuss some of the tools that are now available in terms of new column technologies, injection modes (trap and elute), and separation condition strategies, and even connection systems that can help with the miniaturization of analytical scale separations to micro and nano scale.

Phenomenex: Miniaturized Separations and Increased Sensitivity – What to Expect when Moving to Micro and Nano Scale HPLC (North America)

Miniaturized Separations and Increased Sensitivity – What to Expect when Moving to Micro and Nano Scale HPLC (North America)

New column technologies, injection modes (trap and elute), and separation condition strategies, and even connection systems.

What to Expect when Moving to Micro and Nano Scale HPLC

Are you still using different sorbents for LC and GC?
A method development in SPE can be tricky, depending on your analytes, your matrix and the detection limits you need to reach and the technology you use to run your samples. 
This webinar will show you how to develop an SPE method for LC-MS and GC-MS, which analyte and sorbent characteristics need to be taken into consideration and how to choose the right sorbent and format for your analytes. 
Ion suppression is a big issue in LC-MS. Methodologies will be shown that allow to reduce this. Different materials such as silica based and polymeric will be utilized to serve different analytical technologies. Cleanliness is key in GC-MS. 
The data presented is on Fentanyl and Nor-Fentanyl in urine samples and demonstrates different sorbent interactions but could easily be transferred to other relevant analytes in pharma and clinical research labs. 
<h3>What you will learn:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Which SPE sorbents to use for which analytical technology </li>
<li>Ion Suppression and solutions to improve your results</li>
<li>Sorbent characteristics </li>
<li>LC and GC users looking to simplify their SPE</li>
</ul>
<h3>Who should attend:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Lab managers looking to simplify processes and reduce costs </li>
<li>Analytical chemists looking for better detection limits in complex matrices </li>
<li>Lab technicians looking for single method approaches </li>
<li>Anyone who considers SPE a challenge</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Petra Gerhards (Regional Marketing Manager EMEA CCS, Thermo Fisher Scientific)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Her background is over 30 years of experience in the field of GCMS, SPE and LCMS. Since joining the EMEA Regional Marketing Team for CCS she has been involved in many workflow solutions combining Vials and Closures with SPE solutions, GCMS and LCMS. She works with KOL`s on data for regional specific marketing campaigns, organizes inhouse seminars and works on customer specific solutions. Her main expertise is in the field of Doping and Drugs of Abuse analysis.
</blockquote>

Thermo Scientific: Method development for SPE utilizing new SOLA 30 mg cartridges

Method development for SPE utilizing new SOLA 30 mg cartridges

<h3>Building a strong foundation for your analytical workflow</h3>
Your results are only as accurate as your reference. Within Pharma QC, whether you are performing dissolution testing or releasing finished goods, having accurate, reliable and fully characterized Reference Materials is critical. This webinar will provide viewers with an overview of key concepts relating to Reference Materials.
With a multitude of suppliers serving the industry – both compendial and commercial – there are myriad choices of Reference Materials available for a quality control laboratory. We will discuss how different quality grades are “fit for purpose,” best practices in Reference Material production, and what to look for in a Reference Material Certificate of Analysis.
We will also discuss a novel concept: fully characterized Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) qualified against compendial standards. These CRMs are designed to replace a laboratories in-house working standards and pair with a laboratory’s primary Reference Standards to form a strong, well-characterized and fully traceable Reference Material foundation.
<h3>Key Learning Objectives</h3>
<ul>
<li>Understand how different Reference Material quality grades are fit-to-purpose</li>
<li>Provide key concepts in Reference Material manufacture and characterization</li>
<li>Detail Certificate of Analysis (CoA) key attributes that will be common across sources</li>
</ul>
<h3>Audience</h3>
<ul>
<li>Laboratory Directors</li>
<li>Pharmaceutical Quality Control (QC) Managers</li>
<li>Pharmaceutical Quality Control (QC) technicians</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Michael Hurst (Product Manager - Reference Materials)
</blockquote>

LCMS webinars focusing on Consumables - page 37