Ask any analytical chemist which hyphenated technique has become indispensable over the past decade, and the answer will almost certainly be the same: tandem chromatography–mass spectrometry. Whether it is <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.organomation.com/preparing-samples-for-lc-ms/ms-analysis">LC–MS/MS</a> quantifying a novel biologic’s metabolic fate, or <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.organomation.com/preparing-samples-for-gc-ms/ms-analysis">GC–MS/MS</a> chasing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) down to sub-part-per-trillion levels in municipal water, the combination of chromatographic separation with the specificity of tandem mass detection has become the analytical workhorse of choice across virtually every regulated sector.Below we examine the key forces propelling this expansion, from biopharma pipeline dynamics and PFAS regulatory mandates to AI-driven automation and reshoring of pharmaceutical manufacturing—and explore what each trend means for laboratories managing sample preparation and analytical workflows.<h3>Biopharma: The Engine Room of LC–MS/MS Demand</h3><h4>GLP-1 Agonists and the Metabolomics Gold Rush</h4>The explosive commercial and scientific interest in GLP-1 receptor agonists—<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.sepscience.com/advancing-glp-1-peptide-analysis-chromatography-challenges-and-innovations-12163">semaglutide and related peptide therapeutics </a>for diabetes and obesity—has dramatically expanded the analytical demands placed on tandem MS platforms. Discovery programs require precise quantification of peptide drug candidates and endogenous biomarkers across complex biological matrices. These workflows rely on high-sensitivity LC–MS/MS for pharmacokinetic profiling, receptor occupancy studies, and metabolomics characterization. Metabolomics is, in fact, projected to be the fastest-growing application segment in mass spectrometry, driven in part by its growing role in cancer screening, biomarker discovery, and metabolic disease research.I have been spending more time learning about GLP-1s because this is the hot topic that people want to discuss on the Concentrating on <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://open.spotify.com/show/1wZg67rCjoGju4yhqxI3tL?si=n9GLz9zjSCOrVfXPxFPhng&amp;nd=1&amp;dlsi=52868e027aad4d22">Chromatography podcast</a>. With that said, I was astounded looking at CNBC.com during breakfast this morning to see that <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/21/glp-1-diets-restaurants-protein-fiber-weight-loss-drugs.html">one in eight Americans are currently taking one of these drugs such as Ozempic</a>.<h4>Antibody–Drug Conjugates and Gene Therapy: Complexity at Every Step</h4>The ascent of antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) and gene therapies has introduced a new level of analytical complexity. ADCs blend the target specificity of monoclonal antibodies with the cytotoxic potency of small-molecule payloads—and characterizing the linker chemistry, drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR), and conjugate stability demands high-resolution LC–MS/MS at every stage from discovery through QC release testing. Gene therapy vectors require equally rigorous characterization of impurities, aggregates, and empty/full capsid ratios.This translates into a direct need for low-evaporation, high-recovery concentration methods that preserve labile protein structures and maintain sample integrity prior to LC–MS/MS injection. <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/article/5392">Nitrogen evaporation workflows</a> that minimize oxidative stress and maintain sample temperature are increasingly critical in these pipelines.<h4>Precision Medicine and Multi-Omics Integration</h4>The shift toward precision medicine has accelerated adoption of high-throughput, multi-analyte MS platforms. Proteomics, metabolomics, and lipidomics workflows are converging on a single analytical platform—tandem MS—and generating datasets of a scale and complexity that were unimaginable ten years ago.Make no mistake: the triple quadrupole serves an irreplaceable role in quantitative targeted analysis. At the same time, <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/products?category=134&amp;manufacturerItems=3">Orbitrap </a>and Q–TOF hybrid platforms are growing rapidly as researchers demand full-scan accurate mass for untargeted discovery.<h3>Environmental Mandates: PFAS Testing Drives Adoption</h3>Environmental testing is something that every person, chemist or not, can understand the importance of. Mounting mandates from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and European regulators regarding PFAS—the “forever chemicals” whose extraordinary environmental persistence is matched only by the analytical challenge of detecting them at trace levels—have created immediate, compliance-driven investment in LC–MS/MS infrastructure.<h4>The Regulatory Framework Chemists Need to Know</h4>The EPA has codified a suite of LC–MS/MS-based methods as the analytical standard for PFAS in water and solid matrices:<ul><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://blog.organomation.com/blog/epa-533-drying-down-pfas-samples-after-spe">EPA Method 533</a>: Weak anion exchange SPE combined with LC–MS/MS; covers 25 PFAS including short-chain compounds in drinking water.</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://blog.organomation.com/blog/sample-concentration-epa-method-537-pfas-determination">EPA Method 537.1</a>: Reversed-phase SPE followed by LC–MS/MS; covers 18 PFAS including the GenX compound, with method detection limits in the low ng/L range.</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.agilent.com/en/solutions/environmental/water-testing/pfas-in-water/us-epa-method-8327?srsltid=AfmBOooCY1pcavj7B1PH-75d3HO4BGDglNlhmyTyrpDY3zvUksMO1dlg">EPA Method 8327</a>: LC–MS/MS for selected PFAS in prepared extracts of aqueous and solid matrices.</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://blog.organomation.com/blog/preparing-diverse-sample-matrices-for-epa-method-1633">EPA Draft Method 1633</a>: The emerging benchmark for PFAS in non-aqueous matrices—aqueous, solid, biosolids, and tissue—quantifying up to 40 PFAS.</li></ul>All of these methods designate LC–MS/MS, specifically LC coupled to triple quadrupole or tandem-in-time platforms operating in negative electrospray ionization mode with multiple reaction monitoring (MRM), as the required or recommended analytical technique. PFAS analysis is, at its core, an LC–MS/MS problem.<h4>The Sample Preparation Bottleneck</h4>Chemists who have worked with PFAS methods understand the particular demands they place on sample preparation. The ubiquity of<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://blog.organomation.com/blog/tackling-pfas-contamination-practical-insights-from-epa-537.1-method-development"> PFAS in laboratory materials</a>—PTFE tubing, some SPE sorbents, standard bench supplies—means that blank contamination control is as analytically demanding as the detection itself. EPA 537.1 requires that sample volumes of approximately 250 mL be extracted and reconstituted in as little as 1 mL, creating a 250:1 concentration factor that can expose even trace contamination in the sample processing chain. The installation of a delay column between the LC pump and autosampler to prevent instrument background interference is now standard practice.This is precisely where robust, <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/article/5385">inert nitrogen evaporation </a>systems earn their keep. PFAS workflows that use nitrogen-assisted evaporation to concentrate extracts prior to reconstitution benefit from materials that avoid PTFE and other fluoropolymers that can leach PFAS background—a consideration Organomation addresses in its concentration system designs.The analytical community is also moving beyond targeted PFAS analysis. High-resolution accurate mass (HRAM) spectrometry via Orbitrap technology, paired with non-targeted screening workflows, is gaining traction for the identification of the more than 5,000 currently catalogued PFAS compounds and the novel structures that continue to emerge. LC–MS/MS remains the quantitative gold standard; HRAM provides the discovery layer.<h3>Technological Trends Reshaping the LC–MS/MS Workflow</h3><h4>Artificial Intelligence and Automated Data Interpretation</h4>The datasets generated by modern tandem MS platforms—particularly in omics applications—are too large and too complex for conventional manual review. AI-driven spectral deconvolution, automated peak integration, and AI-assisted hypothesis generation are now embedded in the software suites accompanying leading instruments. <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.agilent.com/about/newsroom/presrel/2022/17feb-gp22004.html?srsltid=AfmBOop3warRIaEojXM2YyMML6RXfMIDzE-Wm0h-SiKkkocBeeET2m7u">Agilent’s acquisition of Virtual Control’s ACIES </a>software specifically to automate LC–MS and GC–MS data analysis is emblematic of this direction.For laboratory managers, AI integration means smaller specialized teams can operate high-throughput multi-analyte workflows—but it also means that the front-end sample preparation must be even more reproducible, since algorithmic interpretation amplifies inconsistencies introduced upstream.<h4>Online SPE Coupling and “Chromatography Without Walls”</h4>A significant trend is the integration of solid-phase extraction directly into the HPLC flow path—so-called online SPE–HPLC coupling. Systems that combine extraction and chromatographic separation in a single analytical instrument reduce manual transfer steps, minimize the risk of sample loss or contamination, and dramatically increase throughput. For analytes at very low concentrations, online SPE provides the on-column concentration capability that traditional offline preparation achieves with manual evaporation steps.That said, offline sample preparation—including <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/article/5392">nitrogen-assisted evaporation</a> under controlled conditions, <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/products/2407">liquid–liquid extraction</a>, and protein precipitation—retains significant advantages in flexibility, matrix handling, and the ability to process sample volumes that exceed online system capacity. The two approaches are increasingly complementary rather than competitive in well-designed analytical laboratories.<h4>High-Purity Solvents and Reference Materials</h4>As detection limits push further into the femtogram range and regulatory methods demand demonstrable blank performance, the quality of analytical consumables—mobile phase solvents, derivatization reagents, reference standards—has moved from background consideration to front-of-mind. Method validation in regulated environments now routinely requires vendor certification of solvent purity at a level that directly interfaces with instrument performance.<h3>The Ever-Present Need for Sample Evaporation</h3>As LC–MS/MS methods push detection limits lower, the analytical burden shifts increasingly upstream. The quality of the concentration, cleanup, and reconstitution steps preceding injection determines whether the instrument’s theoretical sensitivity is achievable in practice.Several specific developments are particularly relevant:<ul><li>ADC and gene therapy characterization workflows require gentle, low-temperature evaporation that preserves protein structure and prevents aggregation prior to LC–MS/MS. Nitrogen evaporation under controlled conditions is the preferred approach.</li><li>PFAS trace analysis demands evaporation systems constructed from PFAS-inert materials, with rigorous attention to avoiding fluoropolymer surfaces throughout the sample path.</li><li>High-throughput pharmaceutical QC driven by reshoring demands parallel processing capability—multi-position evaporators that maintain consistent flow and temperature across all positions simultaneously.</li><li>Multi-omics and metabolomics workflows generate large sample batches that benefit from automated, walk-away evaporation with programmable endpoints to ensure reproducible final volumes across a cohort.</li></ul>Tandem chromatography–mass spectrometry is not merely growing; it is becoming structurally embedded in the analytical workflows of every major regulated industry. The convergence of biopharma complexity, PFAS regulatory mandates, AI-enabled data analysis, and pharmaceutical reshoring is creating a multi-year demand cycle that will require laboratories to invest not only in instruments, but in the entire sample preparation ecosystem that makes those instruments perform.For analytical chemists, the practical takeaway is this: as mass spectrometry sensitivity continues to advance, the sample preparation step becomes the binding constraint on method performance. Whether you are developing a new PFAS method to meet EPA 1633, characterizing an ADC’s drug-to-antibody ratio, or running a 500-sample metabolomics cohort overnight, the reliability and cleanliness of your concentration and cleanup workflow determines the quality of every data point that follows.&nbsp;

The Continued Rise of Tandem Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

<h3>A Practical Guide to Getting the Most from Syringe Filters: Tips, Tricks, and Common Pitfalls</h3>Syringe filters play a crucial role in chromatography and many other laboratory applications by removing particulate matter before analysis. Proper sample filtration helps protect analytical instruments, extends column lifetime, and improves data quality. However, selecting an unsuitable filter—or using one incorrectly—can introduce contamination, reduce filtration efficiency, or even compromise analytical results. The following recommendations will help you avoid common mistakes and ensure reliable filtration every time.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/KNAUER_Avoiding_Common_Syringe_Filter_Mistakes_3_150e8c1c2b.webp" alt="KNAUER: Avoiding Common Syringe Filter Mistakes" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_KNAUER_Avoiding_Common_Syringe_Filter_Mistakes_3_150e8c1c2b.webp 133w," sizes="100vw" width="1276" height="1496"><h4>1. Improper Filter Handling</h4>Using excessive force during filtration or attempting to reuse disposable syringe filters can damage the membrane and increase the risk of sample contamination.<ul><li>Solution: Apply slow, even pressure throughout the filtration process and always dispose of single-use filters after one use. If the flow rate decreases noticeably, replace the filter instead of applying additional force.</li></ul><h4>2. Selecting an Inappropriate Pore Size</h4>Using the wrong pore size may either fail to remove unwanted particles or cause the membrane to clog prematurely, reducing filtration efficiency.<ul><li>Solution: A 0.45 µm membrane is generally suitable for routine particulate removal, while a 0.22 µm membrane is recommended for finer filtration and bacterial removal. Samples with higher viscosity may require a pre-filter to prevent rapid clogging. It is also important to consider the intended analytical technique. For example, 0.22 µm filters are typically preferred for UHPLC and LC-MS applications, whereas 0.45 µm filters are often sufficient for conventional HPLC analyses.</li></ul><h4>3. Choosing the Wrong Membrane Material</h4>Different membrane materials exhibit different chemical resistance. Using an incompatible membrane may lead to degradation of the filter, sample contamination, or complete filtration failure.<ul><li>Solution: Always verify solvent compatibility before filtration. PTFE membranes are an excellent choice for organic solvents, while PES and nylon membranes are better suited to aqueous samples. If compatibility is uncertain, perform a small-scale trial before filtering valuable samples.</li><li>Pro Tip: For additional guidance, see our blog article "How to Choose the Right Membrane for your Syringe Filter", which provides a detailed comparison of membrane materials and their recommended applications.</li></ul><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/KNAUER_Avoiding_Common_Syringe_Filter_Mistakes_2_e47021fb11.jpg" alt="KNAUER Sepapure® Syringe Filters are available with multiple membrane materials, each identified by a dedicated color code for quick and reliable selection." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_KNAUER_Avoiding_Common_Syringe_Filter_Mistakes_2_e47021fb11.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1580" height="902"><h4>4. Ignoring Filter Capacity</h4>Using a filter with insufficient capacity can result in rapid membrane blockage, increasing filtration time and reducing laboratory productivity.<ul><li>Solution: When filtering larger sample volumes, choose high-capacity syringe filters or introduce a pre-filtration step. Never force liquid through a clogged membrane, as doing so may damage the filter and negatively affect sample quality.</li></ul><h4>5. Overlooking Sample Adsorption</h4>Certain membrane materials may adsorb analytes of interest, leading to lower recoveries and potentially affecting quantitative results.<ul><li>Solution: For protein samples or other adsorption-sensitive analytes, select membranes with low binding characteristics, such as nylon or glass fiber, whenever appropriate. Performing a small recovery test before routine analysis can help identify potential analyte losses.</li></ul><h4>6. Failing to Optimize Filtration Performance</h4>Slow filtration is more than just an inconvenience—it often indicates that the filtration conditions are not optimal.<ul><li>Solution: If filtration becomes unusually slow, investigate possible causes such as membrane clogging, excessive sample viscosity, or an unnecessarily small pore size. Depending on the sample, dilution or sequential filtration using progressively finer filters may significantly improve performance.</li></ul><h4>Final Thoughts</h4>Selecting the appropriate syringe filter is a straightforward process, but overlooking small details can have a significant impact on analytical performance. Choosing the correct membrane material, pore size, and filtration strategy helps improve laboratory efficiency, protects chromatography systems and columns, and contributes to accurate, reproducible analytical results.With the right syringe filter and proper filtration technique, you can minimize sample preparation problems and maximize confidence in every analysis.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/KNAUER_Avoiding_Common_Syringe_Filter_Mistakes_4_983a15e289.jpg" alt="KNAUER: Sepapure® Syringe Filter Selection" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_KNAUER_Avoiding_Common_Syringe_Filter_Mistakes_4_983a15e289.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1160" height="627">Happy filtering!

Avoiding Common Syringe Filter Mistakes

News from LabRulezLCMS Library - Week 27, 2026

Article

Product

Application

Academy

Poster

Everything from the world of analytical chemistry in one place. We connect people in solving their problems. At Labrulez you will find all the necessary information easily, quickly and clearly. Stop searching and start finding.

LabRulez

Organomation, founded in 1959, designs and manufactures high-quality nitrogen evaporators and extraction systems. Known for innovation and durability, their lab instruments are used globally for efficient sample preparation with strong customer support.

Organomation

Based in Berlin, KNAUER is a medium-sized, owner-managed company that has been serving the sciences since 1962. We develop and manufacture scientific instruments of superior quality for liquid chromatography, including: Analytical HPLC/UHPLC, Preparative HPLC, Fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC), Multi-column chromatography/Simulated moving bed (SMB) chromatography. High pressure dosing, in-line detection systems, and osmometry are additional business areas.

KNAUER

Agilent Technologies

Shimadzu Corporation

At the analytical scale, liquid chromatography (LC) is widely used by scientists to separate, quantify, and characterize components in mixtures. At the preparative scale, LC is primarily used to purify samples for further downstream analysis. The adoption of preparative LC into a workflow, with larger columns and instrumentation, can appear to be a daunting task. However, by following some fundamental guidelines and a little practical advice, it can be quite simple.
<h5>Key learning objectives</h5>
<ul>
<li>Become familiar with the analytical to preparative chromatography workflow</li>
<li>Learn strategies to efficiently develop methods for purification success</li>
<li>Know how to avoid or recover from common mistakes</li>
<li>Understand how to think like a purification scientist</li>
</ul>
<h5>Who should attend?</h5>
<ul>
<li>Analytical and medicinal chemists who want to learn more about purification or preparative LC, or regarding scale-up from analytical to preparative LC</li>
<li>Lab managers supporting purification labs</li>
<li>Scientists who are curious about incorporating purification into their laboratory workflow</li>
</ul>
 
<blockquote>
Presenter: Scott Bollen (Business Development Manager EMEA, Agilent Technologies)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Scott specializes in small molecule LC columns, ranging from HPLC to UHPLC. Scott has worked at Agilent for 17 years. He started as a technical support manager, and now supports new LC products in R&amp;D as well as the entirety of the existing small molecule LC column portfolio in business development.
</blockquote>

Agilent Technologies: Scale Up from Analytical to Prep with Agilent Prep LC Columns

Scale Up from Analytical to Prep with Agilent Prep LC Columns

Become familiar with the analytical to preparative chromatography workflow and learn strategies to efficiently develop methods for purification success.

From Analytical to Prep with Agilent Prep LC Columns

Join us on 18 &amp; 19 January for two half days of virtual presentations as we help you to navigate the every day challenges faced with the analysis of oligonucleotides. Presented by experts in the industry and the Agilent biopharma team, these short talks are designed to educate and provide insight from basic oligonucleotide assessment, through to the more advanced applications. Q&amp;A sessions will follow each presentation to give you the opportunity to engage with our speakers.
The agenda will cover these topics below and more!
<ul>
<li>Introduction to Oligonucleotide Therapeutics</li>
<li>Analytical &amp; Purification Methods</li>
<li>Workflows for Oligonucleotide CQAs</li>
<li>Practical Tips &amp; Tricks for Preparative HPLC</li>
<li>Analysis of mRNA 5&#39; Capping and Poly-A Tailing by High Resolution LC/MS</li>
</ul>
<h3>Agenda Day 1</h3>
<h5>10:00  Welcome to Agilent Oligo Insight Days</h5>
<h5>10:10 Introduction to Oligonucleotide Therapeutics</h5>
<h5>10:45 Oligonucleotide Analytical and Purification Methods</h5>
<h5>11:25 Workflows for Analysis of Oligonucleotide CQAs</h5>
<h5>12:05 Oligonucleotide Analysis - Tips &amp; Tricks: Putting it all into Practice</h5>

Agilent Technologies: Agilent Oligonucleotide Insight Days

Agilent Oligonucleotide Insight Days (Day 1)

Taking A Deeper Dive into Oligonucleotide Analysis

This webinar will clarify the regulatory status and analytical methods applied for the analysis of mineral oil contaminants, in the form of both saturated (MOSH) and aromatic hydrocarbons (MOAH), in edible oils and food contact materials.
While LC-GC-FID is the standard instrumentation to monitor the levels of these contaminants, multiple sample clean-up techniques must be performed to improve the method robustness and sensitivity.
Join us to learn how Axel Semrau and Shimadzu come together to deliver the best automated solution for your food safety analysis needs.
For the love of food!
Learning Objectives:
<ul>
<li>An update on the regulatory status and analytical methods for MOSH/MOAH analysis
</li>
<li>LC-GC-FID is the standard instrumentation to monitor the levels of these contaminants
</li>
<li>Automated clean-up techniques for the analysis of MOSH/MOAH samples
</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Yoann Costa (R&amp;D Engineer, Phytocontrol)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Started working for Phytocontrol in 2017 at the end of my study in chemistry. Currently a R&amp;D engineer working on development and validation of analytical method for contaminants in food. Had the opportunity to work on different types of contaminants in food such as pesticides and MOSH/MOAH with a large variety of analytical techniques (LC-MS/MS, GC-MS/MS, LC-GC-FID,...)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Dr. Andreas Bruchmann (Managing Director, Axel Semrau GmbH &amp; Co KG)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
After studying Analytical Chemistry at the University of Bochum, Andreas Bruchmann joined Axel Semrau in 1992. He worked in different departments before becoming Managing Director in 2010. Now he is responsible for the business unit Chromatography, which supplies worldwide automated application solutions for the food and pharmaceutical industry. He was involved in the development of the CHRONECT MOSH/MOAH Workstation from the beginning in 2010.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Ang May Yen (Application Manager, Shimadzu Malaysia Sdn Bhd)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Graduated with a Master Degree in Science (Marine Biotechnology) and Bachelor Degree in Science (Industrial Chemistry) from Universiti Malaysia Sabah. 13 years experienced in handling and conducting training on analytical instruments such as UV-VIS spectrophotometer, Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), Gas Chromatography (GC), High Performance Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometer (LCMS, LCMSMS) and Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometer (GCMS, GCMSMS).
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Currently holding a position as Application Manager for Customer Support Centre, Analytical Instrument Division, Shimadzu Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.
</blockquote>

Shimadzu: For the Love of Food! Food Safety and the Analysis of MOSH/MOAH Contamination

For the Love of Food! Food Safety and the Analysis of MOSH/MOAH Contamination

The regulatory status and analytical methods applied for the analysis of mineral oil contaminants, in the form of both saturated and aromatic hydrocarbons.

Food Safety and the Analysis of MOSH/MOAH Contamination

This session will walk you through the importance of instrument performance in a typically a production or continuous use and regulated environments.
Understand the ways and means to maximise the usage time and minimize the downtime for Prominence-i. Let’s discuss more on consumables, replacement frequency and how to keep up our integrated LC!
Learning Objectives:
<ul>
<li>Maximizing Prominence-i productivity
</li>
<li>Avoiding Common Mistakes and Failures
</li>
<li>Best Instrument Operation and Maintenance Practises
</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Chia Chun Chew (Regional Service Engineer, Shimadzu (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Mr Chia Chun Chew holds Bachelor Degree in Mechanical Engineering at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) Singapore, he joined Shimadzu Asia Pacific since 2015. He is specialize in HPLC empower him in support Regional technical issue and key trainer of Prominence-i to field engineers, he is ready to deepen his learning on LC/LCMS. Prior joining Shimadzu he was a field engineer supporting semiconductor manufacturing environment to upkeep equipments productivity, which has put him in good position to think from customer point of interest.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Dhananjay Rajabhoj (Assistant Manager, Shimadzu Analytical (India) Pvt Ltd)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Mr. Dhananjay Rajabhoj holds Bachelor’s Degree of Engineering with specializations in Instrumentation and Control. He joined Shimadzu Analytical India Pvt Ltd since 2018 as Assistant Manager. He technically supports for LC/LCMS queries in pan India and responsible to conduct trainings on LC for field service engineers. Also, he involves critical trouble shooting cases as well as supporting sales cases for non-routing configuration. Previously he has served Healthcare and Pharmaceutical industry for last more than 15 years.
</blockquote>

Shimadzu: Prominence-i | User Maintenance Demonstration and Discussion

Prominence-i | User Maintenance Demonstration and Discussion

The importance of instrument performance in a typically a production or continuous use and regulated environments.

This series is perfect for anyone currently using Preparative LC, who&#39;d like to understand more, as well as those new to the technique or eager to learn more.
Learning Objectives:
<ul>
<li>Differences between Semi-micro and Analytical Scale Prep
</li>
<li>Things to consider in semi-micro and analytical scale purification
</li>
<li>Instrumentation and software advantages
</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Earl Mckoy (Senior LC/LCMS Technical Specialist, Shimadzu UK)
</blockquote>

Shimadzu: Semi-micro to Analytical Scale LC Purification

Semi-micro to Analytical Scale LC Purification

Differences between Semi-micro and Analytical Scale Prep.

As one of the most prominent innovators in LC technology, Shimadzu has set the New Benchmark in the LC innovation by developing the very first AI-enabled LC system, which allows Chemists to spend less time operating, and handling the instrument, as the instrument with its in-built Analytical Intelligence algorithm enables the system of performing automation workflow.
The ultimate objective is to achieve minimized system downtime, optimize efficiency &amp; maximize productivity, through the New Benchmarks in Intelligence, Efficiency and Design.
Learning Objectives:
<ul>
<li>Explore the New Benchmark of Intelligence of New Nexera Series
</li>
<li>Understand the New Benchmark of Efficiency in delivering higher performance and throughput
</li>
<li>Be intrigued by the New Benchmark of Design which promises full system expansion and flexibility
</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
Presenter: David Chan (Assistant Product Manager, Shimadzu (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Graduated from National University of Singapore, Chemistry major. David has acquired more than 10 years of experience in Medicinal Chemistry research for New Drug Discovery. Also, he has also accumulated 2 years of working experience as an Analytical Chemist. He has been with Shimadzu Asia Pacific for 7 years as Product Specialist for LC, providing technical advice to client as well as sales.
</blockquote>

Shimadzu: New Nexera Series, the First AI Enabled and IoT Driven LC

New Nexera Series, the First AI Enabled and IoT Driven LC

Explore the New Benchmark of Intelligence of New Nexera Series.

This webinar gives you an introduction on fully automated pre-column derivatization of the amino acids and microwave digestion method which were adopted to further speed up and increase the analysis efficiency.
A Shimadzu Nexera LC-40X3 with photodiode array (PDA) and fluorescence (RF) detectors were employed for the analysis. The Nexera LC-40X3 equipped with automated pre-treatment function allows several derivatization reagents to be aspirated sequentially from multiple vials and mixing within the needle and the sample loop. Microwave digestion procedure was employed to carry out both acid and alkaline hydrolysis in less than 30 minutes, which is much faster in comparison to the conventional hydrolysis up to 24 hours. Fluorescent (RF) detection was used for high sensitivity analysis (nM), while UV detection was compared, which shows its applicability for µM level quantitation of amino acids.
Learning Objectives:
<ul>
<li>Background of amino acid analysis in feed 
</li>
<li>Comparison between manual vs automated pre-column derivatization
</li>
<li>Sample preparation using conventional hydrolysis vs microwave digestion
</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Liw Wan Tung (Senior Application Chemist, Shimadzu (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Wan Tung, a senior application chemist, has been with Shimadzu for 8 years. She has 11 years of working experience in analytical science, specializing in HPLC. Wan Tung’s recent research work at Shimadzu has mainly focused on fully automated pre-column derivatization of amino acids in a variety of food and biopharmaceutical sample matrices. Prior to joining Shimadzu, Wan Tung started her professional career as a QAQC chemist in Pharmaceutical multinational company. Wan Tung earned her bachelor’s honours degree in chemistry in 2009.
</blockquote>

Shimadzu: Online Pre-column Derivatization and UHPLC Analysis of Total Amino Acids in Animal Feed

Online Pre-column Derivatization and UHPLC Analysis of Total Amino Acids in Animal Feed

Introduction on fully automated pre-column derivatization of the amino acids and microwave digestion method.

Online Pre-column Derivatization and UHPLC Analysis

HPLC Autosampler injector programming has been a feature of Agilent autosamplers since the early days of autosampler innovations.
The injector program contains a series of simple commands that maybe performed during an injection cycle which enables a sample pretreatment. During this session we will discuss how these commands can be employed to make dilutions to reduce sample preparation time. The versatility of the program allows multi-level dilutions with minimum carryover.
<blockquote>
Presenter: Greg Hunlen (Application Scientist, Agilent Technologies, Inc.)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Gregory Hunlen has served as an Application Scientist with Agilent Technologies since 2012. He applies his expertise to the Agilent Infinity II series of LC instruments, providing knowledge of LC solutions such as two dimensional LC and LCMSD workflows. He also delivers product demonstrations and lunch &amp; learns. As a key value, Greg likes to talk about maximizing the use of all features our technologies provide. Often, instruments are under-utilized perhaps as a lack of understanding of all that they can offer. When we explore these features, we discover that we can truly optimize the efficiencies of our instruments. Prior to joining Agilent, Greg spent 20 + years in the pharmaceutical research industry on the liquid phase chromatography side of drug development.
</blockquote>

Agilent Technologies: Strategies for HPLC Analysis using Autosampler Injector Programming

Strategies for HPLC Analysis using Autosampler Injector Programming

How these commands can be employed to make dilutions to reduce sample preparation time.

Strategies for HPLC Analysis using Autosampler Injector

After the introduction of UHPLC in 2004, the competition among HPLC manufacturers worldwide was to bring the system with the highest system back pressure onto the market. But the highest pressure does not automatically lead to the best performance.&nbsp;KNAUER shows you what is really important in modern liquid chromatography in order to optimize speed, resolution and sample throughput while keeping the acquisition costs for UHPLC systems at HPLC level. Get excited!

How to upgrade an HPLC system to the highest performance level 

What is really important in modern liquid chromatography in order to optimize speed, resolution and sample throughput while keeping the acquisition costs

Upgrading HPLC to peak performance: essential tips

Purify an Analyze using Cannabis as an exampleUsing cannabis as an example, we will present our new systems *Cannabis Profiler, *Cannabis Purifier and *Cannabis Producer and will be happy to answer your questions. Of course we are also looking forward to great virtual conversations, interesting "encounters" and informative exchange.<blockquote>Presenter: Lisa LoxterkampPresenter: Max von DelbrückPresenter: Paul Pietsch</blockquote>

Purify and Analyze Cannabis

Using cannabis as an example, we will present our new systems Cannabis Profiler, Cannabis Purifier and Cannabis Produce.

LCMS webinars focusing on HPLC - page 42